THE EFFECTIVENESS OF WRITTEN ‘PEER REVIEW’ TOWARDS ENGLISH 3 STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL

Ma’rifatul Fadhilah

Abstract


The writer conducted this research because the students of non-English department, FITK UIN Semarang could not write text well. They still wrote text with unorganized way, and they did not understand the social function, the generic structure and the language feature of text. Using peer review in writing class, the writer intended to improve students’ writing especially recount, descriptive, procedure, and cause and effect texts. The had two problems: 1). How is the implementation of ‘peer review’ writing for the FITK students of 2014/2015?; 2). How is the writing improvement of FITK students of 2014/2015 after applying ‘peer review’ writing? There are some texts introduced to the FITK students. The students are expected to be able to write text. Through classroom action research implementing peer review, the students’ writing ability had been improved well.


Keywords


Peer review; recount; descriptive; procedure; and cause and effect texts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2007. Penelitian Tindakan untuk Guru, Sekolah, dan Dosen, Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta

_________. 2008. Peneltian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

_________. 2010. Penelitian Tindakan Untuk Guru, Kepala Sekolah dan Pengawas.

Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.

Astrid, Anisa. 2015. Using Peer-Response and Teacher‟s Written Feedback Technique trough Blog in Writing II Class of English Education Study Program, Journal Vision, Vol4, No.1.

Boardman, Cynthia. A. and Frydenberg, Jia. 2008. Writing to Communicate Paragraph and Essays, USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Breuch, Kastman Lee-Ann. 2004.Virtual Peer Review Teaching and Learning about Writing in on Line Environment. USA: State University of New York Press, Albany.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices, (USA: Longman

Brown, Kristine and Hood, Susan. 1993. Writing Matters: writing skills and strategies for students of English. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bruffee in Kristi Lundstorm and Wendy Baker. 2009. “To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer‟s own writing”, Journal of Second Language Writing 18.

Burns, Anne. 1999. Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers, UK: Cambridge University Press,

Chisholm, Richard M. 2007. Introducing Students to Peer Review of Writing, Writing Across the Curriculum. Vol. III, No.1

Coffin, Carile et al. 2005. Teaching Academic Writing: A toolkit for Higher Education. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

Cohen, Louis et al. 2007. Research Method in Education, sixth ed. New York: Rouletdge,

Djuharie, Otong Setiawan. 2008. Genre dilengkapi 700 Soal Uji Pemahaman. Bandung: CV.Yrama Widya

Fromkin, Victoria. 1983. Introduction to Language. New York: Sanders College Publishing.

Graner in Kristi Lundstorm and Wendy Baker. 2009. “To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer‟s own writing”, Journal of Second Language

Writing 18.

Hadi, Sutrisno. 2004. Statistic Second Series, Yogyakarta: Andi offset.

Hansen and Liu in Ricky Lam. 2010. A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback, TESL Canada Journal. Vol. 27, No. 2, Spring.

Hansen & Liu and Mangelsdorf in Ricky Lam. 2010. A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback, TESL Canada Journal. Vol. 27, No. 2, Spring .

Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. How to Teach English: An Introduction to the Practice Of English L Language Teaching. England: Addition Wesley Longman limited

_____________.2003.How to Teach Writing. Longman: Pearson Education Limited

_____________. 2004. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York: Longman Group, Ltd, 2004), p. 17

Heaton, J.B. 1990. Classroom Testing, New York: Longman Group Inc.

Hinkel, Eli. 2004. Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hogue, Ann. 2010. First Step in Academic Writing. Wesley, N.Y: Longman.

Hornby, A.S. 2011. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, New York: Oxford University Press.

Lam, Ricky. 2010. A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback, TESL Canada Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, Spring

Lundstorm, Kristi and Wendy Baker. 2009. “To give is better than to receive: The benefits of review to the reviewer‟s own writing”, Journal of Second Language Writing 18

Marcus in Kristi Lundstorm and Wendy Baker, 2009. “To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer‟s own writing”, Journal of Second Language Writing 18,

Min, Hui-Tzu. 2006.” The Effect of trained peer review on EFL students‟ revision types and writing quality”, Journal of Second Language Writing 15.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/vjv6i11585

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning


Indexed by

Copyright © 2017 Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, ISSN: 2252-8385 (p) 2541-4399 (e)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats