Exploratory Factor Analysis: Analysis of Islamic Bank Sustainability Factors in Facing the Disruption of the Industrial Revolution

Singgih Muheramtohadi*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Choirul Huda  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Retno Septia Adila  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/al-arbah.2022.4.1.14667

Abstract

Purpose - In this study, researchers are interested in analyzing the factors of resilience (sustainability) that must exist or be carried out by Islamic banks to challenge the disruption of the industrial revolution 4.0.

Method - This research is quantitative research. The research approach is exploratory which has the intention to obtain a description and understanding of the problems experienced by researchers. The instrument in this study was a questionnaire which was then tested for validity and reliability. After the data has been collected, the data is tested with the stages of testing confirmatory factor analysis data which is able to reduce a number of variables into several dominant factors that affect the sustainability of Islamic banks in facing the disruption of the industrial revolution 4.0.

Result - This study concludes that: 1) 18 variables each have a Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) value higher than 0.5 and are categorized as having met the adequacy of the sample. 2) Factor analysis is suitable for simplifying the group of 18 variables. 3) Two dominant factors are formed, which are called the customer's financial benefit factor and the customer's safety and comfort factor.

Implication - This research helps Islamic banks to remain sustainable from the onslaught of the disruption of the Industrial revolution 4.0 based on the variables of customer desires.

Originality - This study focuses more on Islamic banking instead of professional banking as in previous studies and in the analysis the researcher uses exploratory factor analysis to determine the dominant factor from  series of variables. The study is different from previous research.

Keywords: Sustainability, Islamic Banks, Disruption.

  1. Alexander, K. (2014). Stability and Sustainability In Bank Reform. Are enviromental risk in Basel III. CISL & UNEP FI: Cambridge and Geneva.
  2. Aracil, E., Nájera-Sánchez, J. J., & Forcadell, F. J. (2021). Sustainable banking: A literature review and integrative framework. Finance Research Letters, 42(December 2020).
  3. Arvanitis, S., & Loukis, E. (2020). Reduction of ICT Investment Due to the 2008 Economic Crisis and ICT-Enabled Innovation Performance of Firms. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 11(1), 1–27.
  4. B. Gutiérrez-Nieto, & C. S.-C. (2019). 20 years of research in microfinance: An information management approach,. International Journal of Information Management, vol 47, 183-197.
  5. Bahl, S. (2012). Green banking-The new strategic imperative. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, vol 2.2, 176–185.
  6. Banhalmi-Zakar, Z. (2016). The impact of bank lending on the environmental outcomes of urban development. Australian Planner, 53(3), 221–231.
  7. Birindelli, G., Ferretti, P., Intonti, M., & Iannuzzi, A. P. (2015). On the drivers of corporate social responsibility in banks: evidence from an ethical rating model. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(2), 303–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9262-9
  8. Bolton, R. N., Chapman, R. G., & Mills, A. J. (2019). Harnessing Digital Disruption With Marketing Simulations. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 15–31.
  9. Clarke, T. (2019). Creative destruction, technology disruption, and growth. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance,.
  10. D. Bonnet, J. Buvat, & K. S. (2018). "When digital disruption strikes: how can incumbents respond? Cap Gemini Consulting,.
  11. D. Zhang, Z. Zhang, & S. M. (2019). A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters, vol 29, 425–430.
  12. Dietz, M., Härle, P., & Khanna, S. (2016). A digital crack in banking’s business model. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 50–53.
  13. Dossa, Z., & Kaeufer, K. (2014). Understanding Sustainability Innovations Through Positive Ethical Networks. In Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 119, Issue 4).
  14. Fabregat-Aibar, L., Barberà-Mariné, M. G., Terceño, A., & Pié, L. (2019). A bibliometric and visualization analysis of socially responsible funds. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(9).
  15. Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D., & Welch, M. (2013). Embracing Digital Technology: A New Strategic Imperative | Capgemini Consulting Worldwide. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(1), 1–13. https://www.capgemini-consulting.com/SMR
  16. Forcadell, F. J., Aracil, E., & Úbeda, F. (2020). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability and Digitalization on International Banks’ Performance. Global Policy, 11(S1), 18–27.
  17. Haddad, C., & Hornuf, L. (2019). The emergence of the global fintech market: economic and technological determinants. Small Business Economics, 53(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9991-x
  18. Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B., & Benlian, A. (2016). The role of the CIO and the CDO in an Organization’s Digital Transformation. 2016 International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016, December.
  19. Horlacher, A., & Hess, T. (2016). What does a chief digital officer do? Managerial tasks and roles of a new C-level position in the context of digital transformation. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016-March(January 2016), 5126–5135.
  20. K. Still, T. Huhtala, & S. S. (2016). FinTech as business and innovation ecosystems. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: A Paper Presented at ISPIM Summit. www.ispim.org
  21. Karim, K. (2017). Kajian Mengenai Kepuasan Nasabah Bank Syariah di Kota Makassar. Conference: Forum Dosen Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam (Fordebi), 1–15.
  22. Karimi, J., & Walter, Z. (2015). The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 39–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1029380
  23. Lubis, I. (2010). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Medan: USU Press, 101.
  24. M. Jeucken. (2010). Sustainable finance and banking: The financial sector and the future of the planet,.
  25. Martin, S. K. &. (2018). Six Digital Growth Strategies for Banks,. In McKinsey & Co.
  26. Mattila, A. S., Hanks, L., & Kim, E. E. K. (2010). The impact of company type and corporate social responsibility messaging on consumer perceptions. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 15(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2010.10
  27. Picher, J. (2020). Branches in Decline: Last One Out, Turn Off the Lights. The Financial Brand.
  28. Prijanto, B., Ferina Pulung, R., & Rusiana Sari, A. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Kualitas Pelayanan Bank Syariah Dengan Bank Konvensional Di Kota Depok Menggunakan Carter Model. Jurnal Tabarru’: Islamic Banking and Finance, 4(1), 178–194.
  29. Rauch, M., Wenzel, M., & Wagner, H. T. (2016). The digital disruption of strategic paths: An experimental study. 2016 International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016, December.
  30. Raut, R., Cheikhrouhou, N., & Kharat, M. (2017). Sustainability in The Banking Industry: A Strategic Multi-Criterion Analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 550–568.
  31. Sari, E. Y. dan R. L. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Non Muslim Menjadi Nasabah Bank Syariah Mandiri di Medan. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, vol 1.no.1, 46–60.
  32. Sarma, P., & Roy, A. (2021). A Scientometric analysis of literature on Green Banking (1995-March 2019). Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(2), 143–162.
  33. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means and how to respond. World Economic Forum, 1–7.
  34. Skog, D. A., Wimelius, H., & Sandberg, J. (2018). Digital Disruption. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 60(5), 431–437.
  35. Supriyaningsih, O. (2020). Analisis Kinerja Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Islamicity Indeces. REVENUE: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Islam, 1(01), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.24042/revenue.v1i01.5714
  36. Tahliani, H. (2020). Tantanganperbankan Syariah Dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid-19. Madani Syariah, 3(2), 92–113.
  37. Utesheva, A., Simpson, J. R., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2016). Identity metamorphoses in digital disruption: A relational theory of identity. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(4), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.19
  38. Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246.
  39. Yip, A. W. H., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2018). Sustainable business model archetypes for the banking industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.190

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Singgih Muheramtohadi, Choirul Huda, Retno Septia Adila
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Al-Arbah: Journal of Islamic Finance and Banking
Published by Department of Sharia Banking, Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 852-3660-5533
Website: https://febi.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: alarbah@walisongo.ac.id

ISSN: 2716-3946 (Print)
ISSN: 2716-2575 (Online)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 
apps