Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan - Indonesia
Project’s cost-benefit analysis for social infrastucture in tertiary education sector with sharia financing and the interest of waqifs: an Indonesia perspective
Purpose - This research was conducted to analyze how CWLS can be promising sources of infrastructure financing by presenting the benefit through the calculation of Cost-Benefit Analysis to the prospective waqifs.
Method - This research used a mixed method: quantitative method using a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) model by monetizing the costs and benefits of education infrastructure. CWLS is used as the source of financing to build it. Meanwhile, the qualitative method is conducted through focus group discussion to present and discuss the project benefit to the prospective waqifs.
Result - The project delivered greater benefits in terms of positive NPV (IDR 937.437.495.257) and IRR (15,60%). The calculation attracts prospective waqifs that consider the non-monetary return in their investment, to invest in CWLS.
Implication - The CWLS issuer should explain the greater benefits generated from the infrastructure financed by the CWLS to the prospective waqif. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is one of the tools to do it effectively.
Originality - This study is one of a few studies exploring the CWLS instrument to finance public infrastructure, with its originality lying in the examination of the attractiveness of the CWLS to the prospective waqifs given the fact that the instrument offers zero profit in terms of financial return, but the beneficial reward from Allah SWT.
Keywords: cost-benefit analysis; social infrastructure; non-monetary benefit; waqif’s interest
- Bappenas. (2019). Rancangan Teknokratik Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020 - 2024 : Indonesia Berpenghasilan Menengah - Tinggi Yang Sejahtera, Adil, dan Berkesinambungan. Kementerian PPN/ Bappenas, 313. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
- Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
- DJPPR, K. K. (2021). Potensi CWLS sebagai Quasi Sovereign Instrumen Untuk Pengembangan Investasi Sosial dan Pendalaman Pasar Keuangan Syariah.
- Einolander, J., Vanharanta, H., Madra-Sawicka, M., Paliszkiewicz, J., Kantola, J., & Pietrzak, P. (2021). Evaluating and Profiling Student Engagement and Motivation at a Higher Education Institution. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, XXIV(Special Issue 5), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2754
- Endro, G. (2016). Tinjauan filosofis praktik gotong royong. Respons, 21(1), 89–112.
- Faiza, N. A. R. (2019). Cash waqf linked sukuk sebagai pembiayaan pemulihan bencana alam di indonesia . Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel.
- Gnade, H., Blaauw, P. F., & Greyling, T. (2017). The impact of basic and social infrastructure investment on South African economic growth and development. Development Southern Africa, 34(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2017.1308854
- Inderst, G. (2016). Infrastructure Investment, Private Finance, and Institutional Investors: Asia from a Global Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2721577
- Kaur, A., & Kaur, R. (2018). Role of Social and Economic Infrastructure in Economic Development of Punjab. In International Journal of Innovative Knowledge Concepts (Vol. 6, Issue 5). www.doie.org
- Khaled Al Shawabkeh, R., Alobaidat, E., Ibraheem Alhaddad, M., & Alzouby, A. M. (2022). The role of social infrastructure services in developing the city centre planning: A framework for delivering sustainable cities in Jordan. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(6), 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101800
- Koopmans, C., & Mouter, N. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis. In N. Mouter (Ed.), Advances in Transport Policy and Planning: Vol. Volume 6 (pp. 1–42). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.07.005
- Kumari, A., & Sharma, A. K. (2017). Physical & social infrastructure in India & its relationship with economic development. World Development Perspectives, 5, 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2017.02.005
- Kurniawan, T., & Rahman, A. A. (2019). Project Based Sukuk (PBS) and Its Implementation in Economic Development in Indonesia. Al-’Adalah, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v16i1.3988
- Leo Tang. (2024, March 29). Social infrastructure requires more financing. The Asset.
- Nakamura, D. (2013). Spatial Policy for a Competitive Regional System: Economic and Social Infrastructure Elements. Journal of Urban Management, 2(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2226-5856(18)30067-0
- Nopijantoro, W. (2017). Surat berharga syariah negara project based sukuk (SBSN PBS): Sebuah instrumen alternatif partisipasi publik dalam pembiayaan infrastruktur. Substansi, 1(2).
- Petohleb Černeha, S., Klun, M., & Devjak, S. (2013). The Social Cost-Benefit Analysis as Estimation Methodology: Case Study for Infrastructure Projects. Mednarodna revija za javno upravo. In International Public Administration Review: Vol. XI (Issue 2).
- Pratiwi, A., Mainata, D., & Ramadayanti, R. S. (2017). Peran Sukuk Negara dalam Pembiayaan Infrastruktur. Al-Tijary, 2(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.21093/at.v2i2.928
- Schuster, R., & King, B. R. (2022). First-year student retention, goal commitment, and institutional commitment: two meta-analyses. SN Social Sciences, 2(8), 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00446-0
- Sheffield, J. T. (2016). The Quality of Life and the Financial Burden of Living On Campus versus Off Campus at The University of West Alabama: A Cost versus Benefit Analysis of Renovating Selden Hall. The University of West Alabama.
- Sidhu, A. S., Pollitt, M. G., & Anaya, K. L. (2018). A social cost benefit analysis of grid-scale electrical energy storage projects: A case study. Applied Energy, 212, 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.085
- Simarmata, N., Yuniarti, K. W., Riyono, B., & Patria, B. (2020). Gotong Royong in Indonesian History. Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities, 5, 00006. https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.45341
- Soleh, K. (2019). Wakaf-sukuk sebagai akselerator peningkatan infrastruktur dan keberlanjutan ekonomi di universitas. Dar El-Ilmi, 6(2), 246–262.
- Srinivasu, B., & Islamia, J. M. (2013). Infrastructure Development and Economic growth : Prospects and Perspective. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 2(1), 81–91.
- Surachman, E. N., Hermawan, R. P., Handayani, D., & Astuti, E. (2023). Evaluation of Sovereign Sukuk as a government financing instrument with stakeholder theory: a moving forward policy from Indonesia’s experience. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(2), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2022-0066
- Syafiq, A. (2018). Pemanfaatan dana wakaf tunai untuk pembiayaan pembangunan inrastruktur. Ziswaf : Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 4(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v4i1.3029
- Tajani, F., Anelli, D., Di Liddo, F., & Morano, P. (2023). An innovative methodology for the assessment of the social discount rate: an application to the European states for ensuring the goals of equitable growth. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-12-2022-0274
- Valenza, A., & Vignetti, S. (2009). Working Paper Series Social Cost-Benefit Analysis For Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study In The War Affected Reas Of Croatia. www.csilmilano.com
- Yescombe, E. R., & Farquharson, E. (2018). Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-04354-5
- Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, & penelitian gabungan. Kencana.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.