Project’s cost-benefit analysis for social infrastucture in tertiary education sector with sharia financing and the interest of waqifs: an Indonesia perspective

Authors

  • Eko Nur Surachman Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan
  • Afia Mauliana Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan, Kementerian Keuangan
  • Nugroho Yonimurwanto Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN, Tangerang Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2024.6.1.18644

Keywords:

cost-benefit analysis, social infrastructure, non-monetary benefit, waqif’s interest

Abstract

Purpose - This research was conducted to analyze how CWLS can be promising sources of infrastructure financing by presenting the benefit through the calculation of Cost-Benefit Analysis to the prospective waqifs.

Method - This research used a mixed method: quantitative method using a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) model by monetizing the costs and benefits of education infrastructure. CWLS is used as the source of financing to build it. Meanwhile, the qualitative method is conducted through focus group discussion to present and discuss the project benefit to the prospective waqifs.

Result - The project delivered greater benefits in terms of positive NPV (IDR 937.437.495.257) and IRR (15,60%). The calculation attracts prospective waqifs that consider the non-monetary return in their investment, to invest in CWLS.

Implication - The CWLS issuer should explain the greater benefits generated from the infrastructure financed by the CWLS to the prospective waqif. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is one of the tools to do it effectively.

Originality - This study is one of a few studies exploring the CWLS instrument to finance public infrastructure, with its originality lying in the examination of the attractiveness of the CWLS to the prospective waqifs given the fact that the instrument offers zero profit in terms of financial return, but the beneficial reward from Allah SWT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bappenas. (2019). Rancangan Teknokratik Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional 2020 - 2024 : Indonesia Berpenghasilan Menengah - Tinggi Yang Sejahtera, Adil, dan Berkesinambungan. Kementerian PPN/ Bappenas, 313. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20

DJPPR, K. K. (2021). Potensi CWLS sebagai Quasi Sovereign Instrumen Untuk Pengembangan Investasi Sosial dan Pendalaman Pasar Keuangan Syariah.

Einolander, J., Vanharanta, H., Madra-Sawicka, M., Paliszkiewicz, J., Kantola, J., & Pietrzak, P. (2021). Evaluating and Profiling Student Engagement and Motivation at a Higher Education Institution. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, XXIV(Special Issue 5), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2754

Endro, G. (2016). Tinjauan filosofis praktik gotong royong. Respons, 21(1), 89–112.

Faiza, N. A. R. (2019). Cash waqf linked sukuk sebagai pembiayaan pemulihan bencana alam di indonesia . Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel.

Gnade, H., Blaauw, P. F., & Greyling, T. (2017). The impact of basic and social infrastructure investment on South African economic growth and development. Development Southern Africa, 34(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2017.1308854

Inderst, G. (2016). Infrastructure Investment, Private Finance, and Institutional Investors: Asia from a Global Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2721577

Kaur, A., & Kaur, R. (2018). Role of Social and Economic Infrastructure in Economic Development of Punjab. In International Journal of Innovative Knowledge Concepts (Vol. 6, Issue 5). www.doie.org

Khaled Al Shawabkeh, R., Alobaidat, E., Ibraheem Alhaddad, M., & Alzouby, A. M. (2022). The role of social infrastructure services in developing the city centre planning: A framework for delivering sustainable cities in Jordan. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(6), 101800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101800

Koopmans, C., & Mouter, N. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis. In N. Mouter (Ed.), Advances in Transport Policy and Planning: Vol. Volume 6 (pp. 1–42). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2020.07.005

Kumari, A., & Sharma, A. K. (2017). Physical & social infrastructure in India & its relationship with economic development. World Development Perspectives, 5, 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2017.02.005

Kurniawan, T., & Rahman, A. A. (2019). Project Based Sukuk (PBS) and Its Implementation in Economic Development in Indonesia. Al-’Adalah, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v16i1.3988

Leo Tang. (2024, March 29). Social infrastructure requires more financing. The Asset.

Nakamura, D. (2013). Spatial Policy for a Competitive Regional System: Economic and Social Infrastructure Elements. Journal of Urban Management, 2(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2226-5856(18)30067-0

Nopijantoro, W. (2017). Surat berharga syariah negara project based sukuk (SBSN PBS): Sebuah instrumen alternatif partisipasi publik dalam pembiayaan infrastruktur. Substansi, 1(2).

Petohleb Černeha, S., Klun, M., & Devjak, S. (2013). The Social Cost-Benefit Analysis as Estimation Methodology: Case Study for Infrastructure Projects. Mednarodna revija za javno upravo. In International Public Administration Review: Vol. XI (Issue 2).

Pratiwi, A., Mainata, D., & Ramadayanti, R. S. (2017). Peran Sukuk Negara dalam Pembiayaan Infrastruktur. Al-Tijary, 2(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.21093/at.v2i2.928

Schuster, R., & King, B. R. (2022). First-year student retention, goal commitment, and institutional commitment: two meta-analyses. SN Social Sciences, 2(8), 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00446-0

Sheffield, J. T. (2016). The Quality of Life and the Financial Burden of Living On Campus versus Off Campus at The University of West Alabama: A Cost versus Benefit Analysis of Renovating Selden Hall. The University of West Alabama.

Sidhu, A. S., Pollitt, M. G., & Anaya, K. L. (2018). A social cost benefit analysis of grid-scale electrical energy storage projects: A case study. Applied Energy, 212, 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.085

Simarmata, N., Yuniarti, K. W., Riyono, B., & Patria, B. (2020). Gotong Royong in Indonesian History. Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities, 5, 00006. https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.45341

Soleh, K. (2019). Wakaf-sukuk sebagai akselerator peningkatan infrastruktur dan keberlanjutan ekonomi di universitas. Dar El-Ilmi, 6(2), 246–262.

Srinivasu, B., & Islamia, J. M. (2013). Infrastructure Development and Economic growth : Prospects and Perspective. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research, 2(1), 81–91.

Surachman, E. N., Hermawan, R. P., Handayani, D., & Astuti, E. (2023). Evaluation of Sovereign Sukuk as a government financing instrument with stakeholder theory: a moving forward policy from Indonesia’s experience. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(2), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2022-0066

Syafiq, A. (2018). Pemanfaatan dana wakaf tunai untuk pembiayaan pembangunan inrastruktur. Ziswaf : Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 4(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v4i1.3029

Tajani, F., Anelli, D., Di Liddo, F., & Morano, P. (2023). An innovative methodology for the assessment of the social discount rate: an application to the European states for ensuring the goals of equitable growth. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-12-2022-0274

Valenza, A., & Vignetti, S. (2009). Working Paper Series Social Cost-Benefit Analysis For Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study In The War Affected Reas Of Croatia. www.csilmilano.com

Yescombe, E. R., & Farquharson, E. (2018). Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-04354-5

Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, & penelitian gabungan. Kencana.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.

The work under license Creative Commons Attribution License