Student engagement in responding activities: Insights and impacts on guidance and counseling practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/jagc.2024.5.1.20532Keywords:
Perception, Responding Activity, Clasical Guidance, Group GuidanceAbstract
Purpose - Perception is one of the variables included in individual characteristics that affect response activities in learning. The purpose of this study is to analyse the description of students' perceptions of responding activities in learning.
Method - Descriptive quantitative research method with a population of 480 students and a sample of 218 students with proportional random sampling technique representing all classes. Data analysis techniques used with percentages.
Result - The results showed that student perceptions of responding activities on average were in the positive category, as well as for the two indicators, namely perceptions of the purpose and benefits of responding activities, each also in the positive category.
Implication – Based on the results of research on students' perceptions, it can be used as a basis in the preparation of counseling programmes based on needs analysis to improve responding activities in learning. Furthermore, in the implementation stage of the programme, students' perceptions can be improved with various BK services, including basic services with various components such as classical guidance, group guidance and information media management regarding the purpose and benefits of responding.
Originality/Value – Novelty in this study is related to the description of student perceptions in responding activities that have never been studied by previous researchers in an analytical descriptive manner as well as its implementation of counseling services in schools.***
Tujuan - Persepsi merupakan salah satu variabel yang termasuk dalam karakteristik individu yang mempengaruhi aktivitas merespon dalam pembelajaran. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis gambaran persepsi mahasiswa terhadap aktivitas merespon dalam pembelajaran.
Metode - Metode penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif dengan populasi 480 siswa dan sampel 218 siswa dengan teknik proporsional random sampling yang mewakili semua kelas. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan persentase.
Hasil - Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi mahasiswa terhadap kegiatan merespon rata-rata berada pada kategori positif, begitu juga untuk kedua indikator yaitu persepsi terhadap tujuan dan manfaat kegiatan merespon masing-masing juga berada pada kategori positif.
Implikasi - Berdasarkan hasil penelitian mengenai persepsi siswa, dapat dijadikan dasar dalam penyusunan program BK berdasarkan analisis kebutuhan untuk meningkatkan kegiatan menanggapi dalam pembelajaran. Selanjutnya pada tahap implementasi program, persepsi siswa dapat ditingkatkan dengan berbagai layanan BK, termasuk layanan dasar dengan berbagai komponennya seperti bimbingan klasikal, bimbingan kelompok dan pengelolaan media informasi mengenai tujuan dan manfaat merespon.
Orisinalitas/Nilai - Kebaruan dalam penelitian ini terkait dengan gambaran persepsi siswa dalam kegiatan responding yang belum pernah diteliti oleh peneliti sebelumnya secara deskriptif analitis serta implementasinya terhadap layanan BK di sekolah.Downloads
References
Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2010). Learning from and responding to students’ questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.20315
Ali, A., Tariq, R. H., & Topping, J. (2009). Students’ perception of university teaching behaviours. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(6), 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903315159
Chaplin, J. P. (1981). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Chevalier, A., Gibbons, S., Thorpe, A., Snell, M., & Hoskins, S. (2009). Students’ academic self-perception. Economics of Education Review, 28(6), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONEDUREV.2009.06.007
Gioiosa, M. E., & Kinkela, K. (2019). Classroom exercises with technology and communication skills: students’ perceptions. Journal of International Education in Business, 12(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-02-2018-0005/FULL/PDF
Ho, D. G. E., Sa’adi, M., He, D., & Hoon, C. Y. (2023). Silence over the wire: student verbal participation and the virtual classroom in the digital era. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(4), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09834-4
Keim, A. C., Sanders, A. M. F., Rada-Bayne, T. B., & Earnest, D. R. (2023). Active Student Responding and Student Perceptions: A Replication and Extension. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/00986283231191110. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283231191110
King, J., & Aono, A. (2017). Talk, silence and anxiety during one-to-one tutorials: A cross-cultural comparative study of Japan and UK undergraduates’ tolerance of silence. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(4), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12564-017-9503-8/TABLES/1
Lambie, G. W., & Haugen, J. S. (2021). The Assessment of School Counseling Competencies as a Tool to Support School Counseling Students, Supervisors, and Training Programs. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/2156759X20981050, 25(1), 2156759X2098105. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X20981050
Lu, G., Xie, K., & Liu, Q. (2022). What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: Perception of the learning environment and students’ motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1665–1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.13204
Maher, K., & King, J. (2022). ‘The Silence Kills Me.’: ‘Silence’ as a Trigger of Speaking-Related Anxiety in the English-Medium Classroom. English Teaching and Learning, 46(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42321-022-00119-4/FIGURES/4
Mazer, J. P., & Stowe, S. A. (2016). Can Teacher Immediacy Reduce the Impact of Verbal Aggressiveness? Examining Effects on Student Outcomes and Perceptions of Teacher Credibility. Western Journal of Communication, 80(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2014.943421
Melovitz-Vasan, C., Gentile, M., Huff, S., & Vasan, N. (2018). Student Perception of Active Learning Group in a Problem-Based Learning Curricular Environment. Medical Science Educator, 28(1), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40670-018-0541-6/TABLES/6
Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-006-9029-2/FIGURES/1
Pillay, Y., Lu, H. T., & Funk, L. (2020). Introducing Mind Mapping as a Creative Counseling Modality. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 15(4), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2020.1746721
Pohan, R. A. (2016). Kontribusi Kepercayaan Diri dan Persepsi Siswa terhadap Kegiatan Merespon dalam Pembelajaran Serta Implikasinya dalam Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jurnal Penelitian Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.30870/JPBK.V1I2.1872
Pohan, R. A. (2021). Pengembangan dan Validasi Andana Responding Activity in Learning Scale (ARALS). Consilium : Berkala Kajian Konseling Dan Ilmu Keagamaan, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.37064/CONSILIUM.V8I1.9225
Pohan, R. A., Hayati, R., & Sahputra, D. (2018). Kontribusi Motivasi Berprestasi dan Konsep Diri terhadap Kegiatan Merespon dalam Pembelajaran Serta Implikasinya dalam Binbingan dan Konseling. Wahana Didaktika : Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 16(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.31851/WAHANADIDAKTIKA.V16I2.1941
Pohan, R. A., & Indra, S. (2020). Efektivitas Layanan Bimbingan Kelompok dalam Meningkatkan Kegiatan Merespon Pembelajaran. Islamic Counseling: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Islam, 4(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.29240/JBK.V4I1.1280
Pohan, R. A., & Siregar, M. (2020). Need Assesment of Guidance and Counseling Module to Improve Freshmen Self-Adjustment. Biblio Couns : Jurnal Kajian Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 3(3), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.30596/BIBLIOCOUNS.V3I3.5221
Prayitno. (2002). Seri Latihan Keterampilan Belajar. Dirjen Dikti PPMPT Depdiknas.
Prayitno. (2013). Pembelajaran Melalui Pelayanan BK di Satuan Pendidikan. Abkin.
Ramberg, J., Låftman, S. B., Almquist, Y. B., & Modin, B. (2019). School effectiveness and students’ perceptions of teacher caring: A multilevel study. Improving Schools, 22(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480218764693/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_1365480218764693-FIG1.JPEG
Savitz-Romer, M., & Nicola, T. P. (2022). An Ecological Examination of School Counseling Equity. Urban Review, 54(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11256-021-00618-X/FIGURES/1
Sedova, K., & Sedlacek, M. (2023). How vocal and silent forms of participation in combination relate to student achievement. Instructional Science, 51(2), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11251-022-09609-1/TABLES/6
Şendurur, E., Ersoy, E., & Çetin, İ. (2018). The design and development of creative instructional materials: the role of domain familiarity for creative solutions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-016-9391-Y/TABLES/4
Shi, M., & Tan, C. Y. (2020). Beyond Oral Participation: A Typology of Student Engagement in Classroom Discussions. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55(1), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40841-020-00166-0/TABLES/1
Siagian, S. P. (2004). Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasinya. Rineka Cipta.
Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Psikologi Kognitif. Pustaka Pelajar.
Tapper, J. (2004). Student perceptions of how critical thinking is embedded in a degree program. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000206663
Wade, C., & Tavris, C. (2007). Psikologi (9th ed.). Erlangga.
Wardani, S. R. (2022). Pengembangan Modul Bimbingan dan Konseling untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Siswa dalam Merespon. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
