Implications of the Noodweer Excess Approach in Excessive Self-Defense with the Integration of Philosophy and Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25559Abstract
This article discusses the case of Noodweer Excess, which is referred to as an emergency defense that exceeds the limits as regulated in Article 49, paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. However, in reality, there are cases of Noodweer Excess that have caused someone's death. Then, this research attempts to discuss and explore how a philosophical perspective can answer and explain complex legal problems. The primary focus of this article's research is how philosophical and legal theories, such as the theory of justice and ethics, can explain the meaning and implications of an emergency defense that exceeds the limits. By integrating legal and philosophical theories, this article aims to provide a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the case, compared to using only one area of legal approach. This research serves as a bridge between legal and philosophical studies and offers broader insights. Thus, this article provides a more complete perspective on how Noodweer Excess or an emergency defense that exceeds the limits as regulated in Article 49 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code can be handled and decided fairly and ethically from the perspective of legal and philosophical theories.
Artikel ini membahas tentang kasus Noodweer Excess yang disebut sebagai pembelaan darurat yang melampaui batas sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 49 ayat (2) KUHP. Namun pada kenyataannya, terdapat kasus Noodweer Excess yang mengakibatkan kematian seseorang. Kemudian, penelitian ini mencoba membahas dan mengeksplorasi bagaimana perspektif filsafat dapat menjawab dan menjelaskan permasalahan hukum yang kompleks. Fokus utama penelitian artikel ini adalah bagaimana teori filsafat dan hukum, seperti teori keadilan dan etika, dapat menjelaskan makna dan implikasi dari pembelaan darurat yang melampaui batas. Dengan memadukan teori hukum dan filsafat, artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam dan komprehensif terhadap kasus tersebut, dibandingkan jika hanya menggunakan satu bidang pendekatan hukum. Penelitian ini berfungsi sebagai jembatan antara kajian hukum dan filsafat serta menawarkan wawasan yang lebih luas. Dengan demikian, tulisan ini memberikan sudut pandang yang lebih lengkap tentang bagaimana Noodweer Excess atau pembelaan darurat yang melampaui batas sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 49 ayat (2) KUHP dapat ditangani dan diputus secara adil dan etis dari perspektif teori hukum dan filsafat.
Downloads
References
Christian, Angga, Ainun Nabilah, and Sulthoni Ajie. 2025. “Teori Keadilan Menurut Jhon Rawls.” Quantum Juris: Jurnal Hukum Modern 07 (1): 598–611. https://journalpedia.com/1/index.php/jhm
Endratno, Cucuk. 2022. “Refleksi Filsafat Hukum: Telaah Sintesa Keadilan.” Yustitiabelen 8 (2): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v8i2.555.
Pratama, Febrian Duta, Rafly Pebriansya, Mohammad Alvi Pratama. 2024. “Konsep Keadilan Dalam Pemikiran Aristoteles.” Praxis: Jurnal Filsafat Terapan 1 (2): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.11111/praxis.xxxxxxx.
Fiantika, Fenny Rita, dkk. 2022. Metodologi Penelitiaan Kualitatif. Sumatera Barat: PT. Global Eksekutif Teknologi.
Haikal, Fikri, Sitti Mawar, and Nurul Fithria. 2020. “Pembelaan Terpaksa Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) Pada Pasal 49 Ayat 2 KUHP Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Kematian (Analisis Putusan Hakim Nomor 01 / Pid . Sus-.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 5 (2): 1–23.
Puspanegara, I Gusti Ngurah, Dwi, Ni Gusti, Agung Ayu, Mas Tri, Luh Putu, and Yeyen Karista. 2024. “Defense Exceed the Limits (Noodweer Exces) in Victim Repositioning Principle.” Justisi 10 (3): 627–39. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.3287
Rizani, Rasyid, Ahmadi Hasan, Masyithah Umar. 2023. “Integrasi Keadilan Moral, Keadilan Hukum, Dan Keadilan Sosial Dalam Putusan Pengadilan.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence,Economic and Legal Theory (IJIJEL) 1 (4): 567–83. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v1i4.179
Rawls, John. 1973. A Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Refin, Fergio Rizkya, and Salman Daffa’ Nur Azizi. 2023. “Dasar Hukum Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) Dan Pembelaan Terpaksa Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) Legal Basis of Forced Defense (Noodweer) and Forced Defense Exceeding Limits (Noodweer Exces).” Jurnal Fundamental JUSTICE 4 (2): 14-30. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v4i2.3277
Soesilo, R. 2013. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia.
Syafaat, Januar Disiam. 2022. “Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer Exces) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana, HAM, Dan Hukum Islam.” Thesis, Surakarta Muhammadiyah University
Reformasi, Titis Pandan Wangi, Aida Dewi. 2024. “Ketimpangan Das Sollen Dan Das Sein: Pemberian Hukuman Mati Imbalance between Das Sollen and Das Sein: Administration of the Death Penalty.” Jurnal Hukum Indonesia 3 (4): 169–75. https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v3i4.1142.
Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.
National Police Criminal Investigation Unit. 2024.
Court Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN KPN.
High Court Decision Number 272/PID/2020/PT PDG.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
