Comparative Regulatory Models for MSME Financial Contract Protection in Indonesia and Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2026.8.1.31777Abstract
This article explores the legal protections available to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) when entering contractual relationships with Financial Service Providers (FSPs) in Indonesia and the Philippines. The study departs from the recurring problem of unequal bargaining positions and the widespread use of standard-form contracts that limit MSMEs' ability to negotiate essential terms. Using a normative legal method supported by statutory analysis and a comparative approach, the research examines the principal regulatory instruments in both jurisdictions—Indonesia's OJK Regulation No. 22 of 2023 and the Philippines' Republic Act No. 11765. The discussion focuses on contractual principles, duties related to market conduct, transparency obligations, and the mechanisms available for consumer protection and enforcement. The comparison demonstrates that Indonesia's regulatory framework emphasizes preventive safeguards, while the Philippines adopts a more assertive model that combines remedial measures, adjudicatory powers, and stronger consumer-oriented guarantees. The findings suggest that Indonesia could enhance its system by reinforcing principle-based supervision, improving suitability assessments, and strengthening its dispute-resolution framework. Through this analysis, the article contributes to ongoing debates on how ASEAN countries might align their approaches to MSME protection in financial contracting.
Artikel ini mengeksplorasi perlindungan hukum yang tersedia bagi Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) ketika menjalin hubungan kontraktual dengan Penyedia Jasa Keuangan (LKM) di Indonesia dan Filipina. Studi ini berangkat dari masalah yang berulang mengenai posisi tawar yang tidak setara dan penggunaan luas kontrak standar yang membatasi kemampuan UMKM untuk menegosiasikan ketentuan-ketentuan penting. Dengan menggunakan metode hukum normatif yang didukung oleh analisis undang-undang dan pendekatan komparatif, penelitian ini mengkaji instrumen regulasi utama di kedua yurisdiksi—Peraturan OJK Indonesia No. 22 Tahun 2023 dan UU Republik Filipina No. 11765. Diskusi berfokus pada prinsip-prinsip kontraktual, kewajiban terkait perilaku pasar, kewajiban transparansi, dan mekanisme yang tersedia untuk perlindungan dan penegakan hukum konsumen. Perbandingan menunjukkan bahwa kerangka regulasi Indonesia menekankan perlindungan preventif, sementara Filipina mengadopsi model yang lebih tegas yang menggabungkan tindakan perbaikan, kewenangan peradilan, dan jaminan yang lebih berorientasi pada konsumen. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia dapat meningkatkan sistemnya dengan memperkuat pengawasan berbasis prinsip, memperbaiki penilaian kesesuaian, dan memperkuat kerangka penyelesaian sengketa. Melalui analisis ini, artikel ini berkontribusi pada perdebatan yang sedang berlangsung tentang bagaimana negara-negara ASEAN dapat menyelaraskan pendekatan mereka terhadap perlindungan UMKM dalam kontrak keuangan.
Keywords: MSME legal protection; standard-form contracts, market conduct regulation.
Downloads
References
Abraham, Facundo, Sergio L. Schmukler, Facundo Abraham, and Sergio L. Schmukler. 2017. “Addressing the SME Finance Problem.” Research and Policy Briefs, Research and Policy Briefs, October 1, 120333. https://ideas.repec.org//p/wbk/wbkrpb/120333.html.
Aliyah, Atsna Himmatul. 2022. “Peran Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat.” WELFARE Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi 3 (1): 64–72. https://doi.org/10.37058/wlfr.v3i1.4719.
Apriani, Nabilah, and Ridwan Wijayanto Said. 2022. “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Industri Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) di Indonesia.” Jurnal Al Azhar Indonesia Seri Ilmu Sosial 3 (1): 28. https://doi.org/10.36722/jaiss.v3i1.1069.
Asian Development Bank. 2020. Asia Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Monitor 2020: Volume 1—Country and Regional Reviews. 0 ed. Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS200290-2.
Atmoko, Dwi. 2022. “Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Suatu Perjanjian Baku.” Binamulia Hukum 11 (1): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i1.683.
D. Bakarbessy, Andress, Miracle Soplanit, and Saartje S. Alfons. 2021. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar Di Kota Ambon.” UNES Law Review 3 (3): 303–12. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v3i3.187.
Farhad, Mohsin Ali. 2024. “Consumer Data Protection Laws and Their Impact on Business Models in the Tech Industry.” Telecommunications Policy 48 (9): 102836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102836.
Fitriana, Dian and Aliya Sandra Dewi. 2023. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Debitur Pada Perjanjian Kredit Tanpa Agunan.” Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara 1 (2): 61–74. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i2.495.
Hetharie, Yosia, Isis Ikhwansyah, and Ema Rahmawati. 2025. “Legal Empowerment of Indonesian Micro Small Medium Enterprises in the Digital Era: A Comparing with China.” Vol ., no. 2.
Karamba, Maryam, and Adiza Musah. 2024. “Examining the Impact of Informal Contract between Delivery of Package by Agents and Their Customers on Shipping.” Acta Logistica 11 (02): 161–72. https://doi.org/10.22306/al.v11i2.469.
Karar, Farah, Umi Juli Handayani, Dini Annisa Putri, and Sri Handayani. 2025. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku UMKM Dalam Kontrak Bisnis Digital.” Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara 3 (2): 139–52. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v3i2.1850.
Kim, Hayam, and Uk Heo. 2017. “Comparative Analysis of Economic Development in South Korea and Taiwan: Lessons for Other Developing Countries.” Asian Perspective 41 (1): 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2017.0002.
Manangin, Susi Aryani. 2022. “The Clause of the Murabahah Financing Agreement in Sharia Banking.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 3 (2): 135–50. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i2.160.
Mas’ud, Riduan, and Mohd Rizal Muwazir. 2025. “The Role of Legal and Regulatory Frameworks for Sharia-Compliant Financing in Promoting Innovation and Quality Enhancement in Indonesia’s Halal Industry.” Khazanah Hukum 7 (2): 174–89. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i2.43440.
Nurlaili, Elly, Aprilianti Aprilianti, Kasmawati Kasmawati, Selvia Oktaviana, and Siti Nurhasanah. 2024. “Protection for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Based on Indonesian Law.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 11 (5): 161. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5710.
OECD. 2016. OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Philippines 2016. OECD Investment Policy Reviews. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264254510-en.
Parluhutan Sinaga, Anton Atno, and Sunday Ade Sitorus. 2023. “The Role of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) towards Community Welfare in Medan City.” Economics, Management and Sustainability 8 (2): 44–52. https://doi.org/10.14254/jems.2023.8-2.4.
Pedraza, Jorge Morales. 2021. “The Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Its Role in the Economic Development of a Country.” Business and Management Research 10 (1): 33. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v10n1p33.
Pelupessy, Sella Petrix, and Universitas Cendrawasih. 2026. Consumer Protection Law as an Extension of Civil Law Governance. no. 2.
“Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat / Soerjono Soekanto Dan Sri Mamudji | Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” n.d. Accessed February 2, 2026. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=7086.
Saputra, Muhammad Bagus Boy, Heniyatun Heniyatun, Hary Abdul Hakim, and Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja. 2021. “The Roles of Local Governments in Accommodating the Registration of SME’s Product Trademarks.” Amnesti Jurnal Hukum 3 (1): 53–59. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v3i1.1227.
Satory, Dr Agus, Dr Yenny Febrianty, SH MHum MKn, Widiyanti Rahayu Budi Astuti, Aditya Fajri Kurnia Pradana, and S. Sy. n.d. METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM.
Sukania, I. Wayan, Agustinus Purna Irawan, Fransisca Iriani Roesmala Dewi, and Esanov Azamat Esirgapovich. 2025. “Legal Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia for SME Performance.” Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) 3 (3): 515–39. https://doi.org/10.53955/jsderi.v3i3.104.
Suprihanti, Antik, Jerome D. Soriano, Andreas Mahendro Kuncoro, Rika Ernawati, and Erna Kurniawati. 2025. “Indonesia and Philippine MSMEs: A Comparison.” SHS Web of Conferences 212: 04043. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521204043.
Syauket, Dr Amalia, M. Si, Rabiah Al Adawiah, S. Ag, M. Si, and Andre Ferdiananto. n.d. HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN INVESTOR Analisis Investasi Ilegal Binomo.
“UMKM Indonesia.” 2026. Kadin Indonesia. https://kadin.id/data-dan-statistik/umkm-indonesia/.
Vaccari, Eugenio, and Migmar Lham. 2026. “Towards Climate‐conscious Corporate Restructuring: A Comparative Exploration of English and Bhutanese Legal Frameworks.” International Insolvency Review, April 27, iir.70041. https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.70041.
Yuanitasari, Deviana, and Agus Suwandono. 2025. “Legal Compliance of Msmes with International Product Standards for Consumer Protection in Cross-Border Trade.” Articles. Transnational Business Law Journal 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.24198/transbuslj.v6i1.2279.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizha Claudilla Putri, Erisa Ardika Prasada, Moulyta Elgi Trinanda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







