Jurimetrics in the Reconstruction of the Joint Property Division Model for Wage-Earner Wives in Indonesia

Abd. Rouf*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Malang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.1.17937

The joint property division in Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Islam/KHI) is one-half (1/2) as long as it is not specified otherwise in the marriage agreement. This is followed mainly by judges because of the legal certainty in it, but not for wives with double burdens who work to earn a living and are also housewives. This research aims to reconstruct the joint property division through jurimetrics analysis to obtain more objective and tested results because it is based on empirical data. This research is a normative law study with a descriptive approach. The data in this study are the Compilation of Islamic Law, and concepts, as well as other laws and regulations related to the joint property division analyzed with jurimetrics to get the ideal formulation and scale of division. The results obtained include several models of joint property division for wage-earner wives (breadwinners) along with the scale of formulation which are divided into two groups, namely the joint property division with a share of one-half for the former husband and wife and the joint property division with a share other than one-half for the former husband and wife according to the role taken by both. This research can be used as a reference by judges in deciding cases of joint property, especially related to the condition that a wife is a wage-earner.

Keywords: breadwinner; jurimetrics; joint property; wage-earner wife

  1. Abdul Aziz, Norazlina, Irini Ibrahim, and Mohd Norhusairi Mat Hussin. ‘Harta Sepencarian/Aset Perkahwinan bagi Pembubaran Perkahwinan di Bawah Seksyen 51 Akta Membaharui Undang-Undang (Perkahwinan dan Perceraian) 1976 Serta Akta Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Wilayah-Wilayah Persekutuan) 1984’. Journal of Shariah Law Research 4, no. 1 (2019): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.22452/JSLR.vol4no1.1.
  2. Alexander, Ongky. ‘Efektivitas Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Pasca Perceraian dalam Persfektif Yuridis Sosiologis’. EL-Ghiroh 16, no. 1 (2019): 113–29. https://doi.org/10.37092/el-ghiroh.v16i01.70.
  3. Apriantoro, Muhamad Subhi, M. Naufal Ibnu Alis, Sendy Septianozakia, and Dadang Setiana. ‘Comparing KHI and KHES in Marital Property Grant Disputes: An Analysis of Judges’ Views’. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2023): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.6464.
  4. Arso, Arso. ‘Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) Sebagai Harta Bersama Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam’. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam 7, no. 1 (2017): 28–56. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2017.7.1.28-56.
  5. Asnawi, M. Natsir. Hukum Harta Bersama: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum, Telaah Norma, Yurisprudensi dan Pembaharuan Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2020.
  6. Asnawi, M. Natsir. ‘Implementasi Jurimetri dalam Penentuan Jumlah Nafkah Anak’. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 5, no. 3 (2016): 331–50. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.3.2016.331-350.
  7. Asnawi, M. Natsir. Pengantar Jurimetri dan Penerapannya dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Perdata: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif terhadap Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2020.
  8. Assaad, Andi Sukmawati, Saifuddin Zuhri Qudsy, Baso Hasyim, Muhammad Taufan Badollahi, and Wahid Haddade. ‘Gender Equity in Inheritance System: The Collaboration of Islamic and Bugis Luwu Customary Law’. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 17, no. 2 (2022): 458–79. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v17i2.6761.
  9. Bani, Lawal Mohammed, and Hamza A. Pate. ‘The Role of Spouses under Islamic Family Law’. International Affairs and Global Strategy 37 (2015): 104–11. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/IAGS/article/view/26388/0.
  10. Boo, Harn Shian. ‘Gender Norms and Gender Inequality in Unpaid Domestic Work among Malay Couples in Malaysia’. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 29, no. 4 (2021): 2353–69. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.14.
  11. Dahlan, Abdul Aziz, ed. Ensiklopedi Hukum Islam. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 1996.
  12. Elimartati, Elimartati, and Elfia Elfia. ‘Kritik terhadap Kompilasi Hukum Islam tentang Ketentuan Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan’. Juris (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 19, no. 2 (2020): 231–43. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v19i2.2283.
  13. Elizabeth, Misbah Zulfa, Ririh Megah Safitri, Naili Ni’matul Illiyyun, Masrohatun Masrohatun, and Titik Rahmawati. ‘Gender Relation in Family in Post-COVID-19 Era: Study among Working Couple in Semarang, Indonesia’. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (2023): 937–58. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.17007.
  14. Hanitijo, Ronny. Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.
  15. Ibrahim, Norliah, and Nora Abdul Hak. ‘Division of Matrimonial Property in Malaysia: The Legal Historical Perspective’. Sejarah: Journal of the Department of History 15, no. 15 (2007): 143–60. https://doi.org/10.22452/sejarah.vol15no15.8.
  16. Jayusman, Jayusman. ‘The Decision on Joint Properties in Bengkulu High Religious Court Jurisdiction’. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 21, no. 1 (2021): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i1.99-118.
  17. Kementerian Agama RI. Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI, 2018.
  18. Loevinger, Lee. ‘Jurimetrics: The Methodology of Legal Inquiry’. Law and Contemporary Problems 28, no. 1 (1963): 5–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1190721.
  19. Lubna, and Dwini Handayani. ‘Working Women and Household Expenditures on Food Away from Home in Indonesia’. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 27, no. 3 (2019): 1573–92.
  20. Mahfiana, Layyin. ‘Keterlibatan Perempuan dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Harta Bersama (Studi di Kabupaten Ponorogo)’. Kodifikasia: Jurnal Penelitian Islam 10, no. 1 (2016): 229–55. https://doi.org/10.21154/kodifikasia.v10i1.809.
  21. Mahfiana, Layyin. ‘Penyelesaian Harta Bersama yang Memberikan Perlindungan bagi Hak Perempuan’. Doctoral Thesis. Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum - UNS Surakarta, 2019.
  22. Mahkamah Agung RI. Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Berkaitan dengan Kompilasi Hukum Islam serta Pengertian dalam Pembahasannya. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2011. https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/read/ebook/23.
  23. Manan, Abdul. Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. 5th ed. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.
  24. Melia, Melia, Muzakkir Abubakar, and Darmawan Darmawan. ‘Pembagian Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian (Studi terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 597K/Ag/2016)’. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 7, no. 3 (2019): 506–18. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i3.665.
  25. Muhammadi, Fauzan, Eva Wulandari, and M. Hajir Susanto. ‘Islamic Triangle Concept of Marital Age: Indonesian Experience’. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 29, no. 2 (2021): 161–72. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v29i2.14162.
  26. Muhyidin, Muhyidin. ‘Rekonstruksi Kedudukan Harta Pencaharian Isteri dalam Konsep Harta Bersama di Indonesia dari Perspektif Hukum Islam’. Doctoral Thesis. Fakultas Hukum, Unissula Semarang, 2017. http://repository.unissula.ac.id/9846/.
  27. Musfira, Musfira, Syahrizal Abbas, Khairani Khairani, and Wahyu Khafidah. ‘The Concept of Joint Property Ownership of Husband and Wife’. In Proceedings of International Conference on Multidiciplinary Research, 4:15–19, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32672/pic-mr.v4i1.3733.
  28. Noortwijk, Kees Van, and Richard De Mulder. ‘A Quantitative Analysis of Legal Word Use’. In 2007 Annual Conference BILETA, 1–10, 2007. https://www.bileta.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/A-quantitative-analysis-of-legal-word-use.pdf.
  29. Nurunnisa, Nurunnisa, Rahmida Erliyani, Gilang Fitri Hermawan, and Yehia Mohamed Mostafa Abdelhadi. ‘Implications of Annulment of Marriage on the Distribution of Joint Assets According to the Compilation of Islamic Law and National Law’. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 23, no. 1 (2023): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v23i1.9523.
  30. Otani, Mikiko, and Masami Kittaka. ‘Family Law in Japan: Overview’. Thomson Reuters Practical Law, 2020. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-009-5907?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true.
  31. Raharjo, M. Dawam. Ensiklopedi al-Qur’an: Tafsir Sosial Berdasarkan Konsep-Konsep Kunci. 1st ed. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1996.
  32. Rahman, Fathur. ‘Konsep Jurimetri dalam Menentukan Nilai-nilai Keadilan (Perspektif Maqâshid Syarîah)’. Doctoral Thesis. UIN Antasari, Banjarmasin, 2022.
  33. Ramli, Mohd Anuar, Mohd Norhusairi Mat Hussin, and Mohammad Aizat Jamaludin. ‘Elemen Sumbangan dalam Pembahagian Harta Sepencarian: Pengalaman Kaum Wanita Melayu di Malaysia’. Esteem Academic Journal 8, no. 2 (2012): 77–92.
  34. Riḍā, Muḥammad Rāshid. Tafsīr al-Manār, Juz 1. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.
  35. Ristianawati, Eka. ‘Joint Property Distribution upon Divorce Reviewed from the Contribution of Husband and Wife in the Household’. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) 3, no. 1 (2021): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2021.3.1.8078.
  36. Rouf, Abd, Mufidah Ch, and Zaenul Mahmudi. ‘Joint Property Division in Indonesia: A Gender Equality Viewpoint’. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah 15, no. 2 (2023): 230–50. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i2.23050.
  37. Sembiring, Kiki Handoko, Teguh Prasetyo, and Sri Endah Wahyuningsih. ‘Reconstruction of Legal Protection Regulations for Teachers Who Commit Acts of Violence in an Educational Environment Based on the Value of Dignified Justice’. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) 4, no. 1 (2023): 47–53. https://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/ijrs/article/view/309.
  38. Shihab, M. Quraish. Wawasan al-Qur’an Tafsir Tematik atas Pelbagai Persoalan Umat. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka, 2007.
  39. Sugiswati, Besse. ‘Konsepsi Harta Bersama dari Perspektif Hukum Islam, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Adat’. Perspektif 19, no. 3 (2014): 201–11. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v19i3.22.
  40. Sutini, Wiwin, and Putu Eka Trisna Dewi. ‘Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian terhadap Kontribusi Isteri sebagai Pencari Nafkah (Studi Komparasi di Australia, Malaysia dan Jepang)’. Aktual Justice 6, no. 2 (2021): 121–39. https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v6i2.768.
  41. Syafei, Ermi Suhasti, and Siti Djazimah. ‘Mediation in Settlement of Joint Marital Property Disputes: Study at Tanjung Karang Religious Court, Lampung’. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (2021): 867–91. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.9039.
  42. Syarif, Ilham Akbar, Shindu Irwansyah, and Ilham Mujahid. ‘Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap Harta Bersama dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam’. In Prosiding Hukum Keluarga Islam, 6:10–12. Bandung: Universitas Islam Bandung, 2020. https://doi.org/10.29313/islamic_family.v0i0.20514.
  43. Umar, Mukhsin Nyak. Kaidah Fiqhiyyah dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam. 2nd ed. Banda Aceh: Yayasan WDC Banda Aceh, 2017.
  44. Utomo, Setiawan Budi. Fiqih Aktual Jawaban Tuntas Masalah Kontemporer. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2003.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Al-Ahkam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with Indonesian Consortium Sharia Scholar (KSSI)
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: 024 7601291
https://fsh.walisongo.ac.id/
email: alahkam@walisongo.ac.id

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View:  Visitor | Country  

 
apps