Narsisme Ulama: Dilema dan Posibilitas Rekonstruksi Ushul Fiqh di Indonesia

Adelina Nasution*  -  IAIN LANGSA, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2018.18.2.2308

This paper  describe the construction of the uṣūl al-fiqh  initiated by Hasan al-Turabi that be dialogued with the religious conditions in Indonesia. Its aim is to find the possibility and inventory the constraints of the reconstruction of the uṣūl al-fiqh in Indonesia. This study uses the hermeneutical method of Paul Ricoeur in analyzing the theoretical ideas of Hasan al-Turabi. In this study found the biggest dilemma of reconstruction of uṣūl al-fiqh in Indonesia: the narcissism of scholars and egoism of intellectuals. Apart from that, there are conditional possibilities found, in order to reconstruct uṣūl al-fiqh  in Indonesia, i.e.: 1) willingness, facilities, protection and consis­tency of the government, and 2) the inclusiveness of traditional clerics in order to create a dialogue on the traditional jurisprudence understood by them with the modern scholars and experts of various sciences. The author concluded that only the integration of modern sciences with the traditional Islamic jurisprudence, that uṣūl al-fiqh re­con­struction could be implemented in Indonesia.

Keywords: rekonstruksi ushul fiqh; pemikiran Islam; Hasan al-Turabi; narsisme ulama

  1. Amiruddin, Hasbi, dan Umar Husen. Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama Islam. Banda Aceh: Ar-Raniry Press, 2009.
  2. Amiruddin, M. Hasbi. Ulama Dayah Pengawal Agama Masyarakat Aceh. Ed. Kamaruzzaman Bustamam-Ahmad. Lhokseumawe: Nadiya Foundation, 2007.
  3. Ansor, Muhammad. “Being Woman in the Land of Shari‘a: Politics of the Female Body, Piety, and Resistance in Langsa, Aceh.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 52, no. 1 (2015): 59–83. https://doi.org/10.14421/ ajis.2014.521.59-83.
  4. ’Arabī, Ibn. al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyah. Terj. Harun Nur Rosyid. Yogyakarta: Dār al-Futuḥāt, 2016.
  5. Arrauf, Ismail Fahmi. “Mencerna Akar Filsafat dalam Islam.” Ulumuna: Journal of Islamic Studies 17, no. 1 (2013): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20414/ ujis.v17i1.170.
  6. “Arti Kata Narsisme.” Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Online. Diakses pada tanggal 26 September 2017. https://kbbi.web.id/narsisme.
  7. Bayat, Asef. Pos Islamisme. Edited by Faiz Tajul Milah. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2011.
  8. El-Fadl, Khaled Abou. Atas Nama Tuhan: Dari Fikih Otoriter ke Fikih Otoritatif. Terj. R. Cecep Lukman Yasin. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu Semesta, 2004.
  9. Fadli, Abdul Hadi. Logika Praktis: Teknik Bernalar Benar. Ed. Iklash Budiman. Jakarta: Sadra Press, 2015.
  10. Fathurahman, Oman. “Meluruskan Niat Menulis.” Kompas.Id, 2017. https://kompas.id/baca/opini/2017/09/26/meluruskan-niat-menulis/.
  11. al-Ghazali. Ihya’ ‘Ulumuddin: Menghidupkan Kembali Ilmu-ilmu Agama. terj. Ibnu Ibrahim Ba’adallah. Jakarta: Republika, 2011.
  12. Hadi, Sutrisno. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Ofset, 1990.
  13. Iqbal, Muhammad, dan Amien Hussein Nasution. Pemikiran Politik Islam: Dari Masa Klasik Hingga Indonesia Kontemporer. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2010.
  14. Isa, Abdul Gani. Formalisasi Syariat Islam di Aceh: Pendekatan, Adat, Budaya dan Hukum. Banda Aceh: Pena, 2013.
  15. Isutzi, Toshihiko. Struktur Metafisika Sabzawari. Terj. O. Komaruddin. Bandung: Pustaka, 2003.
  16. Kartanegara, Mulyadhi. Gerbang Kearifan: Sebuah Pengantar Filsafat Islam. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2006.
  17. ———. Integralisasi Ilmu: Sebuah Rekonstruksi Holistik. Bandung: Arasy, 2005.
  18. ———. Menyibak Tirai Kejahilan: Pengantar Epistemologi Islam. Bandung: Mizan, 2003.
  19. Lubis, Akhyar Yusuf. Metode Fenomenologi Hermeneutika dan Penerapannya pada Ilmu Sosial-Budaya dan Keagamaan: Materi Kuliah Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan & Metodologi. Depok: Pascasarjana FIB-UI, 2011.
  20. Majid, Nurcholish. Islam: Kemodernan dan Keindonesiaan. Bandung: Mizan, 2008.
  21. An-Na’im, Ahmad Abdullah. Islam dan Negara Sekular: Menegosiasikan Masa Depan Syariah. Terj. Sri Murniati. Bandung: Mizan, 2007.
  22. Nasuha, R. Ahmad Muhammad Mustain. “Eksistensi Penerapan Hukuman Mati di Indonesia.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2016): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22515/al-ahkam.v1i1.46.
  23. Nasution, Harun. Teologi Islam: Aliran-aliran Sejarah Analisa Perbandingan. Jakarta: UI Press, 2002.
  24. Nirzalin. “Krisis Agensi Politik Teungku Dayah di Aceh.” Disertasi. Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2011.
  25. Rachman, Budhy Munawar. Argumen Islam untuk Pluralisme. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
  26. Said, Mohammad. Aceh Sepanjang Abad. Medan: Waspada, n.d.
  27. al-Turabi, Hasan al-Hasan. Fiqih Demokratis: Dari Tradisionalisme Kolektif Menuju Modernisme Populis. Terj. Abdul Haris dan Zaimul Am. Bandung: Arasy, 2003.
  28. Yafie, KH. Ali. Menggagas Fiqih Sosial. Bandung: Mizan, 1994.
  29. Yahya, Mukhtar, dan Fatchur Rahman. Dasar-dasar Pembinaan Fiqh Islam. Bandung: al-Ma’ārif, 1986.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Al-Ahkam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with Indonesian Consortium Sharia Scholar (KSSI)
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: 024 7601291
https://fsh.walisongo.ac.id/
email: [email protected]

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View:  Visitor | Country  

 
apps