Board characteristic and Indonesian Islamic bank’s credit risk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2024.6.1.19113Keywords:
board characteristic, credit risk, Indonesian Islamic banksAbstract
Purpose - This study aims to analyze factors that influencing credit risk in Indonesian Islamic banks based on the board characteristic.
Method - This study is a quantitative method using secondary data from nine Indonesian Islamic banks during 2018 to 2022. The sample of this study was taken by purposive sampling method and the data were analyzed using panel data regression analysis, including the classical assumption, F-test and T-Test.
Result - This study povides evidence that sharia supervisor board size and women on board of directors are negative and significantly related to credit risk. However, the education level of board of directors and indepedent commissioners does not influence Indonesian Islamic Bank’s credit risk.
Implication - These findings have implications for regulators and policy study to streghthen the internal governance mechanism to protect the Indonesian Islamic banks from financial failures and increseas the trust of stakeholder thorugh the effectiveness of implementation good corporate governance.
Originality - This study represents a novel contribution to the literature on the determinants of Indonesian Islamic Bank’s credits risk as it conceptualized the relationship between board characteristic and the credit risk. This study represents the few that adopt comprehensive modeling approach by proposing the role of board of directors’ gender diversity and education level and Islamic governance context represented by sharia supervisory board.
Downloads
References
AlAbbad, A., Hassan, M. K., & Saba, I. (2019). Can Shariah Board Characteristics Influence Risk-Taking Behaviour Of Islamic Banks? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 12(4), 469–488.
Aslam, E., & Haron, R. (2021). Corporate Governance and Risk-Taking of Islamic Banks: Evidence from OIC Countries. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(7), 1460–1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2020-0311
Barra, C., & Ruggiero, N. (2023). Banks-Specific Factors and Credit Risk: Evidence From Italian Banks in Different Local Markets. Financial Regulation and Complience, 31(3), 1358–1988. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-04-2022-0051
Darmadi, S. (2011). Corporate governance disclosure in the annual report: An exploratory study on Indonesian Islamic banks. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288661311299295
Endraswati, H., & Cahya, B. (2020). Board Characteristics , Type of Insurance. Iqtishadia, 13(2), 258–281.
Fakhrunnas, F., & Ramly, Z. (2016). Board of Directors and Risk-taking Behavior of Islamic Banks in South East Asia. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 10(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.30993/tifbr.v10i2.107
Farag, Hisham, Mallin, C., & Yong, K. O. (2018). Corporate Governance in Islamic Banks: New Insights for Dual Board Structure and Agency Relationships. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54(59–77). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.0 8.002
Ferhi, A. (2018). Credit Risk and Banking Stability: A Comparative Study Between Islamic and Conventional Banks. International Journal Of Law and Management, 60(4), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-2017-0112
Fernandes-Gago, Cabeza-Garcia, L., & Nieto, M. (2018). Independent Directors Background and CSR Dislosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1515
Hoang, L. T., Nguyen, C., & Le, V. (2018). Bank Risk Behavior and Board Composition: Evidence From Vietnam. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3147073
Jabari, H. N., & Muhamad, R. (2022). Diversity and risk taking in Islamic banks: Does public listing matter? Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.003
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Strucutre. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Kartika, I., Sulistyowati, S., Septiawan, B., & Indriastuti, M. (2022). Corporate governance and non-performing loans: The mediating role of financial performance. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2126123
Khoirotunnisa, F. (2021). Board Gender Diversity and Board Education Diversity Terhadap Bank-Rsik Taking. BALANCE: Economic, Business, Management and Accounting Journal, 18(2), 1–7.
Kwashie, A. A., Baidoo, A. T., & Ayesu, E. K. (2022). Investigating The Impact of Credit Risk On Financial Perfomance of Commercial Banks in Ghana. Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2109281
Lu, J., & Boateng, A. (2018). Board Composition, Monitoring and Credit Risk: Evidence From UK Banking Industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 51(4), 1107–1128.
Mansoor, M., Ellahi, N., Hassan, A., Malik, Q. A., Waheed, A., & Ullah, N. (2020). Corporate governance, Shariah governance, and credit rating: A cross-country analysis from asian islamic banks. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040170
Mollah, S., Skully, M. T., & Liljeblom, E. (2021). Strong Board and Risk-Taking in Islamic Banks. Review of Corporate Finance, 1(1–2), 135–180. https://doi.org//10.2139/ssrn.2905179
Mukhibad, H., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Shariah supervisory board attributes and corporate risk-taking in Islamic banks. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2158607
Nguyen, Q. K. (2021). Oversight of bank risk-taking by audit committees and Sharia committees: conventional vs Islamic banks. Heliyon, 7(8), e07798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07798
Nugraheni, P., & Muhammad, R. (2019). Board of directors and credit risk: An empirical study of Indonesian Islamic banks. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 23(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v23i4.3484
Ramly, Z., Datuk, N., & Nordin, H. M. (2018). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Sharia Supervision Board, Board Independence, Risk Committee and Risk-taking of Islamic Banks in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(4), 290–300. http:www.econjournals.com
Roziq, A., & Ahmad, Z. I. (2024). Enhancing Perfomance: Minimizing Risk in Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2294519
Safiullah, M., & Shamsuddin, A. (2018). Risk in Islamic banking and corporate governance. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 47, 129–149.
Siddique, A., Khan, M. A., & Khan, Z. (2021). The Effect Of Credit Risk Management and Bank-Specific Factors on The Financial Perfomance of The South Asian Commercial Banks. Asian Journal Of Accounting Research, 7(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-08-2020-0071
Srivastav, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Corporate Governance and Bank Risk-taking. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12133
Umar, U. H., Abduh, M., & Besar, M. H. A. (2023). Shari’a Supervisory Board and Islamic Banks’ Insolvency Risk. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 9(3), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v9i3.1635
Wang, M.-J., Su, X.-Q., Wang, H.-D., & Chen, Y.-S. (2017). Directors Education and Corporate Liquidity: Evidence From Boards in Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49(2), 463–485.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
The work under license Creative Commons Attribution License