Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta - Indonesia
Board characteristic and Indonesian Islamic bank’s credit risk
Purpose - This study aims to analyze factors that influencing credit risk in Indonesian Islamic banks based on the board characteristic.
Method - This study is a quantitative method using secondary data from nine Indonesian Islamic banks during 2018 to 2022. The sample of this study was taken by purposive sampling method and the data were analyzed using panel data regression analysis, including the classical assumption, F-test and T-Test.
Result - This study povides evidence that sharia supervisor board size and women on board of directors are negative and significantly related to credit risk. However, the education level of board of directors and indepedent commissioners does not influence Indonesian Islamic Bank’s credit risk.
Implication - These findings have implications for regulators and policy study to streghthen the internal governance mechanism to protect the Indonesian Islamic banks from financial failures and increseas the trust of stakeholder thorugh the effectiveness of implementation good corporate governance.
Originality - This study represents a novel contribution to the literature on the determinants of Indonesian Islamic Bank’s credits risk as it conceptualized the relationship between board characteristic and the credit risk. This study represents the few that adopt comprehensive modeling approach by proposing the role of board of directors’ gender diversity and education level and Islamic governance context represented by sharia supervisory board.
Keywords: board characteristic; credit risk; Indonesian Islamic banks
- AlAbbad, A., Hassan, M. K., & Saba, I. (2019). Can Shariah Board Characteristics Influence Risk-Taking Behaviour Of Islamic Banks? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 12(4), 469–488.
- Aslam, E., & Haron, R. (2021). Corporate Governance and Risk-Taking of Islamic Banks: Evidence from OIC Countries. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(7), 1460–1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2020-0311
- Barra, C., & Ruggiero, N. (2023). Banks-Specific Factors and Credit Risk: Evidence From Italian Banks in Different Local Markets. Financial Regulation and Complience, 31(3), 1358–1988. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-04-2022-0051
- Darmadi, S. (2011). Corporate governance disclosure in the annual report: An exploratory study on Indonesian Islamic banks. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288661311299295
- Endraswati, H., & Cahya, B. (2020). Board Characteristics , Type of Insurance. Iqtishadia, 13(2), 258–281.
- Fakhrunnas, F., & Ramly, Z. (2016). Board of Directors and Risk-taking Behavior of Islamic Banks in South East Asia. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 10(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.30993/tifbr.v10i2.107
- Farag, Hisham, Mallin, C., & Yong, K. O. (2018). Corporate Governance in Islamic Banks: New Insights for Dual Board Structure and Agency Relationships. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54(59–77). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.0 8.002
- Ferhi, A. (2018). Credit Risk and Banking Stability: A Comparative Study Between Islamic and Conventional Banks. International Journal Of Law and Management, 60(4), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-2017-0112
- Fernandes-Gago, Cabeza-Garcia, L., & Nieto, M. (2018). Independent Directors Background and CSR Dislosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 991–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1515
- Hoang, L. T., Nguyen, C., & Le, V. (2018). Bank Risk Behavior and Board Composition: Evidence From Vietnam. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3147073
- Jabari, H. N., & Muhamad, R. (2022). Diversity and risk taking in Islamic banks: Does public listing matter? Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.003
- Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Strucutre. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
- Kartika, I., Sulistyowati, S., Septiawan, B., & Indriastuti, M. (2022). Corporate governance and non-performing loans: The mediating role of financial performance. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2126123
- Khoirotunnisa, F. (2021). Board Gender Diversity and Board Education Diversity Terhadap Bank-Rsik Taking. BALANCE: Economic, Business, Management and Accounting Journal, 18(2), 1–7.
- Kwashie, A. A., Baidoo, A. T., & Ayesu, E. K. (2022). Investigating The Impact of Credit Risk On Financial Perfomance of Commercial Banks in Ghana. Cogent Economics and Finance, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2109281
- Lu, J., & Boateng, A. (2018). Board Composition, Monitoring and Credit Risk: Evidence From UK Banking Industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 51(4), 1107–1128.
- Mansoor, M., Ellahi, N., Hassan, A., Malik, Q. A., Waheed, A., & Ullah, N. (2020). Corporate governance, Shariah governance, and credit rating: A cross-country analysis from asian islamic banks. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040170
- Mollah, S., Skully, M. T., & Liljeblom, E. (2021). Strong Board and Risk-Taking in Islamic Banks. Review of Corporate Finance, 1(1–2), 135–180. https://doi.org//10.2139/ssrn.2905179
- Mukhibad, H., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Shariah supervisory board attributes and corporate risk-taking in Islamic banks. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2158607
- Nguyen, Q. K. (2021). Oversight of bank risk-taking by audit committees and Sharia committees: conventional vs Islamic banks. Heliyon, 7(8), e07798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07798
- Nugraheni, P., & Muhammad, R. (2019). Board of directors and credit risk: An empirical study of Indonesian Islamic banks. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 23(4), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v23i4.3484
- Ramly, Z., Datuk, N., & Nordin, H. M. (2018). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Sharia Supervision Board, Board Independence, Risk Committee and Risk-taking of Islamic Banks in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(4), 290–300. http:www.econjournals.com
- Roziq, A., & Ahmad, Z. I. (2024). Enhancing Perfomance: Minimizing Risk in Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2294519
- Safiullah, M., & Shamsuddin, A. (2018). Risk in Islamic banking and corporate governance. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 47, 129–149.
- Siddique, A., Khan, M. A., & Khan, Z. (2021). The Effect Of Credit Risk Management and Bank-Specific Factors on The Financial Perfomance of The South Asian Commercial Banks. Asian Journal Of Accounting Research, 7(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-08-2020-0071
- Srivastav, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Corporate Governance and Bank Risk-taking. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12133
- Umar, U. H., Abduh, M., & Besar, M. H. A. (2023). Shari’a Supervisory Board and Islamic Banks’ Insolvency Risk. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 9(3), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v9i3.1635
- Wang, M.-J., Su, X.-Q., Wang, H.-D., & Chen, Y.-S. (2017). Directors Education and Corporate Liquidity: Evidence From Boards in Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49(2), 463–485.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.