Residents preferences associated with tax amnesty program predisposition

Authors

  • Prasojo Prasojo Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Lailatis Syarifah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2020.2.2.6072

Keywords:

tax amnesty, taxpayer, tax official, declaration of assets and ransom

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to determine the motivation of taxpayers to take part in tax amnesty so that it is expected to be able to evaluate the implementation of tax amnesty that has been carried out by the Indonesian government in 2016-2017 and provide empirical evidence on the implementation of the tax amnesty program to support the stick and carrot theory in the implementation of taxation in Indonesia.

Method - The methodology used in this research is a case study. Interviews are used to collect data and are supported by secondary data from sites, web, and documents.

Result - The results of this study indicate that the reasons for many taxpayers to join this program were because it is beneficial for the country and avoid the risk of administrative sanctions (fines and interest) as well as audits. The reason for taxpayers who did not participate in this program was because they did not have other assets that had not been reported in the tax return.

Implication - The implication of this study is to determine the motivation of taxpayers to take part in tax amnesty so that it is expected to be able to evaluate the implementation of tax amnesty. At the same time, that has been carried out by the Indonesian government in 2016-2017 and provides empirical evidence on the implementation of the tax amnesty program to reason action and social learning theory in the implementation of taxation in Indonesia.

Originality - This study explores information from regulators (tax officials) and taxpayers, both those who do and who do not participate in tax amnesty, which is rarely done by other researchers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alabede, J. O., Ariffin, Z. Z., & Idris, K. (2011). Individual Taxpayers' Attitude and Compliance Behaviour in Nigeria: The Moderating Role of Financial Condition and Risk Preference. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 3, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v5i1.54.

Alberto, Ferry (2016). Pengaruh Kebijakan Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) Oleh Pemerintah terhadap Potensi Peningkatan Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia Tahun 2015. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Bakrie, 4(1).

Alm, J., & Rath, D. M. (2003). Tax Policy Analysis: The Introduction of a Russian Tax Amnesty. Ssrn. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.471321.

Bagiada, I. M., & Darmayasa, I. N. (2016). Tax Amnesty Upaya Membangun Kepatuhan Sukarela. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Vokasi V, 1–24.

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students’ intention to adopt mobile learning. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, JRIT-03-2017-0004. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2017-0004.

Damayanti, T. W., Sutrisno, T., Subekti, I., & Baridwan, Z. (2015). The Role of Taxpayer's Perception of the Government and Society to Improve Tax Compliance. Accounting and Finance Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v4n1p180.

Diamastuti, E. (2012). Ke (Tidak) Patuhan Wajib Pajak: Potret Self Assessment System. Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 20(80), 280–304.

Direktur Jenderal Pajak, & Keuangan, K. (2017). Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Pajak.

Hardiningsih, P. dan Yulianawati, N. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kemauan Membayar Pajak. Dinamika Keuangan dan Perbankan, 3(1), 126–142. https://doi.org/ISSN: 1979-4878.

Hidayah, A. N., Indah, A. N., Yus’atika, W., Shofana, N. U., Maulida, L. A., Zahra, H. A., ... & Aslamiyah, S. (2020). Kolaborasi Otoritas Pajak Bersama Relawan Pajak Dalam Pemberian Layanan Perpajakan di Kantor Pajak Pratama Jepara. Buletin Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, 4(2), 45-55.

Irfansyah, N., Bawono, I. R., & Suparlinah, I. (2020). Tax Aggressiveness Affected by Corporate Social Responsiblity, Earnings Management, and Audit Quality. Permana: Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 12(2), 196-214.

Kominfo. (2017). No Title. Retrieved September 25, 2018, from https://www.kominfo.go.id/content/detail/9520/realisasi-tax-amnesty-deklarasi-rp48134-triliun-dan-repatriasi-rp146-triliun/0/berita

Lu, Y., Guo, J. C., Lu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2017). Nankai Business Review International Article information: The Role of Online Communication in Avoiding the Restrictiveness of Shopping Websites: A Social Learning Theory Perspective.

Maula, H., Saifullah, M., Nurudin, N., & Zakiy, F. S. (2019). The Influence of Return on Assets, Leverage, Size, and Capital Intensity on Tax Avoidance. AFEBI Accounting Review, 4(01), 50-62.

Megarani, N., Warno, W., & Fauzi, M. (2019). The effect of tax planning, company value, and leverage on income smoothing practices in companies listed on Jakarta Islamic Index. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research, 1(1), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2019.1.1.3733.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Keempat atas Undang- Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 Tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan Menjadi Undang-Undang. Sekretarian Negara. Jakarta.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak. Jakarta.

Ragimun. (2016). Analisis Implementasi Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementrian Keuangan. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan. Retrieved from http://www.kemenkeu.go.id

Ross, B. G. (1986). Federal tax amnesty: reflecting on the states' experiences author(s): Bonnie G . Ross Source: The Tax Lawyer, 40(1) (Fall 1986), pp. 145-184 Published by American Bar Association Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/20769148 Ac, 40(1), 145–184.

Yuliana, E. S., Tarmizi, T., & Soraya, S. (2019). Efektivitas Implementasi Pemungutan PBB P2 Kota Pontianak. Eksos, 15(2), 129–136.

Warno, W., & Fahmi, U. (2020). Pengaruh Tax Avoidance dan Biaya Agensi Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dengan Kualitas Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pada Perusahaan LQ45. EL MUHASABA: Jurnal Akuntansi (e-Journal), 11(2), 188-201.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-11

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.

The work under license Creative Commons Attribution License