Tax aggressiveness determinants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2021.3.1.7412Keywords:
company characteristics, corporate social responsibility, good corporate governance, tax aggressivenessAbstract
Purpose - This study aims to examine the effect of capital intensity, inventory intensity, corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance on tax aggressiveness. Good corporate governance variables used in this study were proxied with independent commissioners and audit commitments.
Method - This research focused on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period of 2016-2018. 177 samples were collected using a purposive sampling technique from 59 companies over an observation period of 3 consecutive years. The samples were then analyzed using a multiple linear regression.
Result - The results of this study show that capital intensity has a positive and significant effect on tax aggressiveness, inventory intensity has a positive but not significant effect on tax aggressiveness, corporate social responsibility has no positive and significant effect on tax aggressiveness, Independent commissioner has a positive and significant effect on tax aggressiveness, and audit committee has a negative but significant effect on tax aggressiveness.
Implication - The results show that the company with high capital intensity tends to be more aggressive on tax. Therefore, the tax authorities must be aware to companies with these characteristics.
Originality - The addition of corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance as independent variables are thought to be related to the company’s tax aggressiveness.Downloads
References
Abidin, M. Z., Askandar, N. S., & Afifudin. (2018). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Tindakan Pajak Agresif. Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi.
Adisamartha, I. B. P. F., & Noviari, N. (2015). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Leverage, Intensitas Persediaan Dan Intensitas Aset Tetap pada Tingkat Agresivitas Wajib Pajak Badan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 13, 973-1000.
Agoes, S., & Ardana, I. C. (2013). Etika Bisnis dan Profesi: Tantangan Membangun Manusia Seutuhnya. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Arismajayanti, & Jati, I. (2017). Influence Of Audit Committee, Committee Independence, Independence Commissioner, and Leverage On Tax. Journal Of Auditing, Finance and Forensic Accounting, 5(2).
Andhari, P. A. S., & Sukartha, I. M. (2017). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility, Profitabilitas, Inventory Intensity, Capital Intensity dan Leverage pada Agresivitas Pajak. E- Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 18, 2115–2142.
Asri, I. A. T. Y., & Suardana, K. A. (2016). Pengaruh Proporsi Komisaris Independen, Komite Audit, Preferensi Risiko Eksekutif dan Ukuran Perusahaan pada Penghindaran Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi. 16(1), 72-100.
Baker, M. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility in 2003: A Review of the Year. www.mallenbaker.net. 3 Juli 2003.
Branco, M., & Rodrigues, L. (2007). Positioning Stakeholder Theory within the Debate on Corporate Social Responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies , 32, 5-15.
Chariri, A., & Ghozali, I. (2007). Teori Akuntansi. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Christiana, & Africano, F. (2017). Peran Corporate Governance sebagai Pemoderasi atas Pengaruh Agresivitas Pelaporan Keuangan terhadap Agresivitas Pajak (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2012-2016). Jurnal Akuntansi, 1–20.
Chiou, Y.C., Hsieh, Y.C., & Lin, W. (2012). Determinants of Effect Tax Rates for Firm Listed on China`s Stock Markets: Panel Models with Two-Sided Censors. International Trade & Academic Research Conference (ITARC). 7-8th November 2012.
Davis, A. K., Guenther, D. A., Krull, L. K., & Williams, B. M. (2016). Do socially responsible firms pay more taxes? The Accounting Review, 91(1), 47–68.
Deegan, C. (2004). Financial Accounting Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company: Sydney.
Diantari, P. R., & Ulupui, I. A. (2016). Pengaruh Komite Audit, Proporsi Komisaris, dan Proporsi Kepemilikan Institusioanal terhadap Tax Avoidance. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 16, 702–732.
Dwiyanti, I. A. I., & Jati, I. K. (2019). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Capital Intensity, dan Inventory Intensity Pada Penghindaran Pajak. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana. 27(3), 2302-8556.
Gray, R, Owen D., and Adams, C. 1996. Accounting and Accountability. Prentice Hall Europe.
Freise, A., Link, S., & Mayer, S. (2008). Taxation and corporate governance – The state of the art. In: Schon, W, Tax and Corporate Governance. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
Huseynov, F., & Bonnie, K. K. (2012). Tax avoidance, Tax Management and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(6), 804-827.
Hidayat, A. T., & Fitria, E. F. (2018). Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, Profitabilitas dan Leverage terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. ejournal.stiedewantara.
Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2025–2059.
Imelia, S. (2015). Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Manajemen Pajak dengan Indikator Tarif Pajak Efektif (ETR) pada Perusahaan LQ45 yang terdaftar dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010-2012. Jurnal Fekon, 2(1), 1–15.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Jessica, & Toly, A. A. (2014). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Tax & Accounting Review, 4(1).
Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2018). http:/www.kemenkeu.com. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
Khaoula, A., & Ali Z. M. (2012). The Board of Directors and the Corporate Tax Planning: Empirical Evidence from Tunisia. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting. 2(2), 142-157.
Kuriah, H. L., & Asyik, N. F. (2016). Pengaruh karakteristik perusahaan dan corporate social responsibility terhadap agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 5(3), 1-19.
Landolf, U. (2006). Tax and Corporarate Responsibility. International Tax Review 29, 6-9.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The Effect of Board Director Composition on Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50-70.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2015). Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance? Journal Business Ethics 127, 439-457.
Maharani, I. G. A. C., & Suardana, K. A. (2014). Pengaruh Corporate Governance ,Profitabilitas dan Karakteristik Eksekutif pada Tax Avoidance Perusahaan Manufaktur. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 9(2), 525–539.
Megarani, N., Warno, W., & Fauzi, M. (2019). The effect of tax planning, company value, and leverage on income smoothing practices in companies listed on Jakarta Islamic Index. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research, 1(1), 139-162. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2019.1.1.3733
Midiastuty, P. P., Suranta, E., Indriani, R., & Putri, S. I. (2016). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Pengendali dan Corporate Governance terhadap Tindakan Pajak Agresif. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi , 1-27.
Mustika. (2017). Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Leverage, Capital Intensity dan Kepemilikan Keluarga terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. JOM Fekon, 4(1) , 1886-1900.
Noviyanti, F., Anggra, E., & Muttaqin , I. (2017). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Struktur Kepemilikan, Manajemen Laba, dan Leverage terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. e-journal Universitas Pancasakti.
Nugraha, N. B., & Meiranto, W. (2015). Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Leverage dan Capital Intensity terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 4, 1–14.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No.33/POJK.04/2014 Tentang Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 55/POJK.04/2015. Tentang Pembentukan dan Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kerja Komite Audit. (Online). www.ojk.go.id/regulasi/peraturan-ojk/POJK-Nomor55.POJK.04.2015.
Prasojo, P., & Syarifah, L. (2020). Residents preferences associated with tax amnesty program predisposition. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research, 2(2), 209-228. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2020.2.2.6072
Putri. (2014). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Manajemen Laba dan Corporate Governance terhadap Agresivitas Pajak Perusahaan. Artikel.
Slemrod, J. (2004). The Economics of Corporate Selfiishness. Tax Journal, 57, 877-99.
Suyanto, K. D., & Supramono. (2012). Likuiditas, Leverage, Komisaris Independen, dan Manajemen Laba terhadap Agresivitas Pajak Perusahaan. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 16(2), 167–177.
Suryana. (2011). Kewirausahaan Pendoman Praktis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Watson, L. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An examination of unrecognized tax benefits. Working Paper. The Pennsyl-vania State University.
Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, tax avoidance, and earnings performance. The Journal of the American Taxation Association (JATA), 37(2), 1–21.
Yoehana, M, (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsbility Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak. Universitas Diponegoro.
Zeng, T. (2016). Corporate social responsibility, tax aggressiveness, and firm market value. Accounting Perspectives, 15(1), 7-30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
The work under license Creative Commons Attribution License