PANDANGAN DAN SIKAP MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PLULARITAS AGAMA DI INDONESIA

Sarjuni Sarjuni*  -  , Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/wa.v15i2.534

Abstract

This article is the result of fundamental  research conducted  in 2011. It is intended to see how far the ideas of pluralism can be understood and accepted by public who are often involved in violance on the behalf of religion.

The method applied in this research is indepth interview, news paper documentation, discourse analysis.

Based on the analysis result, it is found that  there are three opinions about religious pluralism. First, formalitistic tradisionalist opinion, that is: there is only one true religion, it is the religion that he/she belongs to. second, the unconcerned attitude or apathy to the religious reality of religion in Indonesia.. Third, a radical opinion, they think that the followers of other religion –out side of the religion that they belong to, must be have enough, and if it is needed by using violance and force.

Keyword:  pluralitas, kekerasan, konflik agama

  1. References
  2. Adam, Ian (2004) Ideologi Politik Mutakhir: Konsep, Ragam, Kritik, dan Masa Depannya, Judul asli Political Ideology Today, Yogyakarta: Qalam.
  3. Agustian, Ary Ginanjar (2002) ESQ Rahasia Sukses Membangun Kecerdasan Emosi dan Spiritual Berdasarkan 6 Rukun Iman dan 5 Rukun Islam. Jakarta: Arga.
  4. Archard, D. (ed.) (1996) Philosophy and Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Armstrong, Karen (2000) The Battle for God: Fumdamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. New York: Harper Collins.
  6. Brown, Gillian, and Yule, George (1996) Analisis Wacana: Discourse Analysis. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  7. Dweck, Carol S. (2007) Change Your Mindset, Change Your Life. Jakarta: Serambi.
  8. Fadl, Khaled Abou el. (2004) Atas Nama Tuhan: Dari Fikih Otoriter ke Fikih Otoritatif, terj. R. Cecep Lukman Yasin. Jakarta: Serambi.
  9. Gibbon, Michael T. (ed.) (2002) Tafsir Politik: Telaah Hermeneutis Wacana Sosial-Politik Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Qalam. Judul asli Interpreting Politics.
  10. Giddens, Anthony (1992) Modernity and Self-Identity. London: Routledge.
  11. Goleman, Daniel (1997) Emotional Intelligence, Kecerdasan Emosional: Mengapa EI LebihPenting Daripada IQ? terj. T. Hermaya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  12. Grillo, R. D. (1998) Pluralism and the Politics of Difference: State, Culture, and Ethnicity in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
  13. Habermas, Jürgen (2004) Krisis Legitimasi, terj. Yudi Santoso. Yogyakarta: Qalam. Judul asli Legitimation Crisis.
  14. Hall, Stuart (1990) “Cultural Identity and Dispora” dalam J. Rutherford (ed.), Identity, Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence & Wihsart.
  15. Haryatmoko (1999) “Agama: Etika Sosial untuk Mengatasi Konflik” dalam Kompas, 14April 1999.
  16. Haryatmoko, “Dominasi Laki-laki Melalui Wacana,” dipublikasikan dalam situs Internet http://www.sekitarkita.com/wacana/haryatmoko.htm.
  17. Haryatmoko (2000) “Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur: Transparansi sebagai Proses”, Basis Edisi Akhir Tahun 2000.
  18. Hefner, Robert W. (ed.) (2001) Politics of Multiculturalism: Pluralism and Citizenship in Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai Press.
  19. Huntington, Samuel P. (1996) The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  20. Kurzman, Charles (ed.) (2001) Wacana Islam Liberal: Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer tentang Isu-Isu Global, terj. Bahrul Ulum dan Heri Junaidi. Jakarta: Paramadina.
  21. Laski, Harold J. (1936) The Rise of Liberalism: The Philosophy of a Business Civilization. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  22. Nussbaum, Martha (1986) The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Stoltz, Paul (2001) Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Tantangan Menjadi Peluang. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  24. Tamara, M. Nasir dan Taher, Elza Peldi (eds.) (1996) Agama dan Dialog Antarperadaban. Jakarta: Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina.
  25. Zohar, Danah dan Ian Marshall (2000) SQ: Spiritual Intelligence as the Ultimate Intelligence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2016 Wahana Akademika: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional

View My Stats
apps