BUDAYA KOMUNIKASI WARGA MADURA

Mahfudlah Fajrie*  -  , Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Th e diversity of the existing cultures in an area emerged the di? erences of communication cultures as well. Th e communication cultures of Madura’s people with especially Javanese in Jepara are certainly di? erent. Th e formulations of the problem in this study are (1) how are the communication cultures in aspect of language use conducted by Madura’s people who worked as the barber in Tahunan Jepara regency? (2) How are the symbols in the communication process conducted by Madura’s people in Tahunan Jepara regency?. Th is research used ? eld research method and ethnograpy approach. Th e data in this research were gained through observation, interview, and documentation. Th e data analysis used cultural theme analysis. Th e data validity in this research used the triangulation technique of data (source). Th e results of this research are: (1) the communication cultures of Madura’s people who worked as the barbers in Tahunan Jepara are loudly and clearly intonation in communication. In addition, they directly express the intention and purpose of their speaking. Languages used by the barbers from Madura with the customers are Javanese and Indonesia language. However, they use Madura language to communicate with their fellows. (2) Th e symbols used by the Madura’s barbers in communicating are verbal symbol called oral communication and non-verbal symbol called body language. Th e symbol of body language is the shaking of the head as the sign that they do not understand what the customers mean. Th e other way, the body language by pitching of the head is as the sign of agreement and understanding of communication purpose.

Keyword: Culture, Communication, Madura.

  1. Bibliografi
  2. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Asdi Mahasatya.
  3. Astutik, Kurnia Fahmi dan Sarmini. (2013). Budaya Kerapan Sapi sebagai Modal Sosial Masyarakat Madura di Kecamatan Sepulu Kabupaten Bangkalan. Jurnal Kajian Moral dan Kewarganegaraan Volume 2 No. 1. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
  4. Berger, Arthur Asa. (2000). Tanda-tanda dalam Kebudayaan Kontemporer. Terjemahan M. Dwi Mariyanto dan Sunarto. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  5. Creswell, John W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: SAGE Publications.
  6. Devito, Joseph A. (1996). Komunikasi Antarmanusia. Jakarta: Professional Book.
  7. Haryono, Akhmad. (2011). Pola Komunikasi Warga NU Etnis Madura sebagai Budaya Aternalistik. Humaniora Journal of Culture, Literature and Linguistics Volume 23 No. 2. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  8. Liliweri, Alo. (2001). Gatra-gatra Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  9. __________. (2003). Dasar-dasar Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  10. __________. (2009). Makna Budaya dalam Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Yogyakarta: PT. LKiS Printing Cemerlang.
  11. Moleong, Lexy. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  12. Sobur, Alex. (2004). Semiotika Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  13. Tubbs, Stewart L. dan Moss, Sylvia. (1996). Human Communication: Konteks-konteks Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  14. Wahyuningsih, Sri. (2014). Kearifan Budaya Lokal Madura sebagai Media Persuasif (Analisis Semiotika Komunikasi Roland Barthes dalam Iklan Samsung Galaxy Versi Gading dan Giselle di Pulau Madura). Jurnal Sosio Didaktika Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember.
  15. Wijana, I. Dewa Putu. (2004). Relasi Bahasa dan Budaya serta Berbagai Permasalahannya dalam Semiotika Vol. 5 No. 2 Juli.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2016 Wahana Akademika: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional

View My Stats
apps