The Yahukimo Conflict within the Ideal Narratives of Pancasila and Multiculturalism

Masykur Masykur

doi:10.21580/ws.29.2.10388

Authors

Masykur Masykur Faculty of Ushuluddin and Islamic Ethics, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Serang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0855-3721

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.29.2.10388

Keywords:

Yahukimo, tribal conflict, Pancasila, conflict resolution, multiculturalism

Abstract

The ideology of Pancasila is agreed upon to reconcile ethnic, religious, racial and intergroup diversity. However, tribal fanatism clashes in understanding inevitably lead to social conflicts, such as the tribal conflict in Yahukimo Papua. Based on this background, there are research questions, first, why do tribal social conflicts still exist in the Pancasila ideology state? How is Pancasila ideology able to be main foundation of the resolution of tribal social conflict? Methodologically, this paper is the result of literature study research. To explain the research questions, Bhikhu Parekh's theory of multiculturalism is used. In addition, the literature study method is used for data collection and the sociological approach for data analysis. The results of this study can be concluded that first, social conflicts with tribal nuances in the Pancasila ideological state will continue to have the potential to emerge when national identity is not maintained with a commitment to nationalism. Second, for this reason, the ideology of Pancasila in must continue to be carried out structurally and culturally for the resolution of tribal social conflicts. In the future, it is hoped that the Pancasila will ideally be embedded to strengthen national identity and unity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardi, A. M. (2017). Pancasila sebagai Resolusi Konflik: Relasi Kuasa, Agama, dan Antar Etnis di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jurnal Prodi Damai dan Resolusi Konflik, 3(2), 35–60. https://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/DRK/article/view/74/0

Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. In Textbooks Collection - 3. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3

Buchanan, C. (2011). Pengelolaan Konflik di Indonesia - Sebuah Analisis Konflik di Maluku, Papua dan Poso. Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, Current Asia clan the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.

Coser, L. A. (1957). Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change. The British Journal of Sociology, 8(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/586859

Dahrendorf, R. (1958). Toward a Theory of Social Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200204

Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. Henry Holt and Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/14663-000

Ejobowah, J. B., & Kymlicka, W. (1997). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne Des Études Africaines, 31(1), 182. https://doi.org/10.2307/485334

Fisher, R. (2000). Sources of Conflict and Methods of Resolution (International Peace and Conflict Resolution School of International Service The American University). http://www.communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8/10887248/sources_of_conflict_and_methods_of_resolution.pdf

Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Destruktion and Deconstruction. In D. P. Michelfelder & R. E. Palmer (Eds.), Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. State University of New York.

Heidegger, M. (2004). The Phenomenology of Religious Life. Indiana University Press.

Kuper, A., & Kuper, J. (2000). Ensiklopedi Ilmu-ilmu Sosial (H. Munandar (trans.)). RajaGrafindo Persada.

Lebang, T. (2007). Berbekal Seribu Akal Pemerintahan dengan Logika: Sari Pati Pidato Wakil Presiden Jusuf Kalla. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (1999). Berfilsafat dari Konteks (Y. P. Utomo (ed.)). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Marshall, D. G. (2004). On Dialogue to its Cultured Despisers. In B. Krajewski (Ed.), Gadamer’s Repercussions: Reconsidering Philosophical Hermeneutics. University of California Press.

Muslimin, H. (2016). Tantangan terhadap Pancasila sebagai Ideologi dan Dasar Negara Pasca Reformasi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 7(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v7i1.1791

Parekh, B. (1989). Colonialism, Tradition and Reform: An Analysis of Gandhi’s Political Discourse (Revised). Sage Publications.

Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Mcmillan Press Ltd.

Parekh, B. (2004). Redistribution or Recognition? A Misguided Debate. In T. and M. J. S. S. Modood (Ed.), Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights. Cambridge University Press.

Parekh, B. (2008). New Politics of Identity: Political Principles for an Interdependent World. Palgrave Macmillan Press.

Pebrianto, F. (2021, October 5). Begini Kronologi Kerusuhan di Yahukimo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1513838/begini-kronologi-kerusuhan-di-yahukimo

Poespowardojo, S. (1991). Filsafat Pancasila: Sebuah Pendekatan Sosio-Budaya. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Taylor, C. (1992). The Politics of Recognition (A. Gutmann (ed.); Expended e). Princeton University Press.

Thompson, M. J. (2017). Introduction: What Is Critical Theory? In The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory (pp. 1–14). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5_1