MULTIKULTURALISME DAN HEGEMONI POLITIK PERNIKAHAN ENDOGAMI: IMPLIKASI DALAM DAKWAH ISLAM

Syarifah Ema Rahmaniah*  -  University of Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

This paper described a variety of views on the dynamics of endogamy marriage practiced by sharif community in Pontianak. This paper used the theory of hege­mony to analyze Surah al-Ahzab: 33 as the cause of endogamy among the descendants of 'Isa al-Muhajir (Ba ‘Alawi) that have migrated to the archipelago. One of her off spring grew and spread in Pontianak was called sharif or syarifah of Pontianak. The results of this study explained that there are three different attitudes about endogamous marriage, they are accept, reject and moderate thinking. The three different attitudes came out as the result of modernization, contact with foreign cultures, the influence of education, socio-economic, and the existing settlement pattern. There is a socio-political implications of the verses of hegemony that is keeping the values of the potential political kinship as social capital to raise awareness and political culture in the context of community participation and representation of sharif in local and national politics. But in sociocultural context. Once endogamy was understood as an absolute system that must be run so it may open space of social stratification that threatens women’s freedom and will open the spaces for subordination.

 

Keywords: syarif; Pontianak; endogami; hegemoni; stratifikasi sosial

  1. Amal, Siti Hidayati, “Menelusuri Jejak Kehidupan Keturunan Arab Jawa di Luar Tembok Keraton Yogjakarta” Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, Vol. 29 No. 2, 2005.
  2. Berg, Van den, L.W.C, Hadramaut dan Koloni Arab di Nusantara, Jakarta: INIS, 1989.
  3. Garna, Judistira K, Teori Sosial Pembangunan II, Bandung: Primaco Akademika, 2009.
  4. Gramsci, Antonio, Selections form the Prison Notebook, London: Edited and translated by Quince Hoore & Goffrey Nowell Smith, 1971.
  5. Halim, Ridwan, Hukum Adat dalam Tanya Jawab, Jakarta: Ghali Indonesia, 1987.
  6. Hendarto, Heru, “Mengenal Konsep Hegemoni Gramsci” dalam Diskursus Ke¬masyarakatan dan Kemanusiaan, Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia, 1993.
  7. Hobden, S & Jones, R.W, “Marxist Theories of International Relations,” dalam Smith, S & Baylis, J. (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  8. Keesing, Roger M, Cultural Anthropology, A Contemporary Perspective, terj. Antropologi Budaya, Suatu Perspektif Kontemporer, Jakarta: Erlangga, 1992.
  9. Koentjaraningrat, Kebudayaan, Mentalitas dan Pembangunan, Jakarta: Gramedia, 1981.
  10. Koentjaraningrat, Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta 2002.
  11. Lamanna, Ann Mary & Agness Riedmann, Marriages and Family: Making Choices Throughtout the Life of Cycle, California: Wadswortth Publishing Company, 1987.
  12. Malinowski, Bronislaw, Crime and Custom in Savage Society, London: Trench & Trubner-Kagan Paul, 1926.
  13. Nemnan DM, Grauerholz L, Sociology of Families, California: Pine Forge Press, 2002.
  14. Parwesi, Ni Kadek Yunita, “Perkawinan Endogami di Kalangan Masyarakat Tenga¬nan Pegringsingan di Kabupaten Karangasem Bali,” Tesis, tidak diterbitkan, Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajahmada, 2012.
  15. Patria, Nezar dan Andi Arief, Antonio Gramsci, Negara dan Hegemoni, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1999.
  16. Poloma, M Margaret, Sosiologi Kontemporer, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2000.
  17. al-Qadri, H, Dutch Policy Againts Islam and Indonesians of Arab Descent in Indonesia, Jakarta: LP3ES, 1983.
  18. Rahardjo, Turnomo, Menghargai Perbedaan Kultural Mindfulness dalam Komuni¬kasi antar Budaya, Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.
  19. Ritzer, George, Sosiologi Ilmu Berparadigma Ganda, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
  20. Rizkiati, Kurnia, “Perkawinan Endogami pada Masyarakat Keturunan Arab (Studi di Kampung Arab Al-Munawar Kelurahan 13 Ulu Kecamatan Seberang Ulu II Kota Palembang), Skripsi tidak diterbitkan, Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya Palembang, 2012.
  21. Rogers, Everett M., Thomas & M. Steinfactt, Intecultural Communication, Illinois: Waveland Press Inc, 1999.
  22. Sapir, Edward, “Custom” dalam Selingman, Edwin R.A & Alvin Johnson (ed.), Encyclopedia of The Social Sciences, New York: Macmillan Company, 1931.
  23. Shahab, Yasmine Zaky, “Sistem Kekerabatan Sebagai katalisator Peran Ulama Keturunan Arab di Jakarta,” Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, Vol. 29 No. 2, 2005,
  24. Shahab, Yasmine Zaky, Endogami and Multiculturalism:The Case of Hadrami in Indonesia.
  25. Simon, Roger, Gagasan-gagasan Politik Gramsci, Yogjakarta: Insist dan Pustaka Pelajar:, 1999.
  26. Siregar, Hamka, “Pernikahan Endogami pada Komunitas Arab Alawiyyun kota Pontianak,” Disertasi, Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2009.
  27. Sugiono, Muhadi, Kritik Antonio Gramsci terhadap Pembangunan Dunia Ketiga, terj. Cholis. Yogjakarta: Pustaka pelajar, 1999
  28. Suparlan, Parsudi, “Menuju Masyarakat Indonesia yang Multikultural“, makalah disampaikan dalam Simposium Internasional III Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, Universitas Udayana, Bali tahun 2002.
  29. Toomey, Ting Stella, Communicating Across Cultures, New York: The Guilford Publications Inc., 1999.
  30. Ullman, Robert, Redefining Security, United States: International Security, 1983
  31. Upe, Ambo, Tradisi Aliran dalam Sosiologi: dari Filosofi Positivistik ke Post Positivistik, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2010.
  32. William, Goode, J, Sosiologi Keluarga, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2014 Syarifah Ema Rahmaniah
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M)
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Rectorate Building, 3rd Floor
Jl. Prof. Hamka - Kampus 3, Tambakaji Ngaliyan 50185, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Email: walisongo@walisongo.ac.id

 

 
apps