The Role of Local Wisdom as Religious Conflict Resolution in Jambi Indonesia

Pahrudin HM*  -  Departement of Political Science, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Abdul Halim  -  UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

This research aims at analyzing the potential for social conflict, especially religious conflict related to the establishment of houses of worship in Jambi. This study was conducted by employing a qualitative research approach with a type of case study research. This research was conducted in three districts in Jambi (Telanaipura, Alam Barajo, and Kotabaru). The results show that as a plural city, Jambi is not spared from the conflict of the establishment of places of worship that occurred in three regions. However, the previous conflicts that occurred were not prolonged because the people of Jambi still adhered to the wisdom of the local culture in the form of Seloko Adat which internalized through family, education, and the environment. As a significant potential of a conflict resolution, however, the Jambi society in general are lack of understanding of Seloko Adat.

Keywords: house of worship; local wisdom; religious conflict; safety-valve.

  1. Agus, Bustanuddin. 2006. Agama Dalam Kehidupan Manusia: Pengantar Antropologi Agama. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada.
  2. Ayatrohaedi. 1986. Kepribadian Budaya Bangsa. Bandung: Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016. “Kota Jambi Dalam Angka 2016.” Jambi: BPS Kota Jambi.
  4. Bakri, Hendry. 2015. “Resolusi Konflik Melalui Pendekatan Kearifan Lokal Pela Gandong Di Kota Ambon.” The POLITICS: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin 1 (1): 51–60.
  5. Boedhi Oetojo, Vina Salviana, Haryanto, Racmad K. Dwi Susilo, and Bambang Prasetyo. 2010. Sistem Sosial Budaya Indonesia. Tangerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.
  6. Coser, Lewis A. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Routledge.
  7. Crabtree, Benjamin F., and William L. Miller. 1999. Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
  8. Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. London and New Delhi: Sage publications.
  9. Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2009. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  10. Fisher, Simon, Jawed Ludin, Stave Williams, Dekha Ibrahim Abdi, Richard Smith, and Sue Williams. 2000. Mengelola Konflik: Keterampilan Dan Strategi Untuk Bertindak. Jakarta: British Council.
  11. Idi, Abdullah. 2012. “HARMONI SOSIAL: Interaksi Sosial Natural-Asimilatif Antara Etnis Muslim Cina Dan Melayu-Bangka.” THAQAFIYYAT: Jurnal Bahasa, Peradaban Dan Informasi Islam 13 (2).
  12. Jalaludin, Adon Nasrullah. 2015. Agama Dan Konflik Sosial: Studi Kerukunan Umat Beragama, Radikalisme Dan Konflik Antarumat Beragama. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
  13. Johnson, Doyle Paul. 1998. Teori Sosiologi Klasik Dan Modern. Translated by Robert MZ Lawang. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  14. Kimball, Charles. 2008. When Religion Becomes Evil. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
  15. Lembaga Adat Provinsi Jambi. 2003. “Dinamika Adat Jambi Dalam Era Global.” Jambi: Lembaga Adat Propinsi Jambi.
  16. Lindayanti, Junaidi Tajuddin Noor, and Ujang Hariadi. 2013. Jambi Dalam Sejarah, 1500-1942. Jambi: Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata, Provinsi Jambi.
  17. Lulofs, Roxane Salyer, and Dudley D. Cahn. 2000. Conflict: From Theory to Action. USA: Allyn & Bacon.
  18. Mariane, Irene. 2014. Kearifan Lokal Pengelolaan Hutan Adat. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
  19. Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Translated by Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI press.
  20. Mitchell, Bruce, Dwita Hadi Rahmi, and B. Setiawan. 2003. Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Dan Lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  21. Mufid, A. Syafi’i. 2010. “Revitalisasi Kearifan Lokal Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat.” Harmoni 9 (34): 83–92.
  22. Nasikun, J. 2004. Sistem Sosial Indonesia. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada.
  23. Poloma, Margaret M. 2004. Sosiologi Kontemporer. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  24. Robertson, Rolan. 1993. Agama Dalam Analisis Dan Interpretasi Sosiologi. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  25. Rosdiawan, Ridwan, Zaenuddin Hudi, and Ibrahim M. Shaleh. 2007. “Merajut Perdamaian Di Kalimantan Barat.” Revitalisasi Kearifan Lokal: Studi Resolusi Konflik Di Kalimantan Barat, Maluku, Dan Poso, 20–107.
  26. Sartini. 2009. Mutiara Kearifan Lokal Nusantara. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.
  27. Sindung, Haryanto. 2012. Spektrum Teori Sosial: Dari Klasik Hingga Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
  28. Suaedy, Ahmad, and Rumadi. 2007. Politisasi Agama Dan Konflik Komunal: Beberapa Isu Penting Di Indonesia. Wahid Institute.
  29. Suprapto. 2013. “Revitalisasi Nilai-Nilai Kearifan Lokal Bagi Upaya Resolusi Konflik.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 21 (1): 19–38.
  30. Trubus Rahardiansyah, P., and H. Arohman Prayitno. 2011. Transformasi Nilai Kearifan Lokal Dalam Pendidikan Bangsa: Dialektika Pentingnya Pendidikan Berbasis Local Genius. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti.
  31. Wirawan, Ida Bagus. 2012. Teori-Teori Sosial Dalam Tiga Paradigma: Fakta Sosial, Definisi Sosial, Dan Perilaku Sosial. Jakarta: Kencana.
  32. Yin, Robert K. 2004. Studi Kasus: Desain Dan Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa.
  33. Zakaria, R. Yando. 1994. Hutan Dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Lokal. Jakarta: Wahana Lingkungan Hidup.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Pahrudin HM, Abdul Halim
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M)
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Rectorate Building, 3rd Floor
Jl. Prof. Hamka - Kampus 3, Tambakaji Ngaliyan 50185, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Email: walisongo@walisongo.ac.id

 

 
apps