Localizing Jihad, Globalizing Jimat: Banser and Jamaah Maiyah in a Global Village

Ahmad Karim*  -  Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, Dept. of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

(*) Corresponding Author

During the last two decades, a dramatic transition from authoritarianism to a rapid process of democratization has been experienced by many different societies across the world. In Indonesia, reformasi 1998 has not only been followed by a massive transformation in many different dimensions but also the changing character of interdependently hybrid governance arrangements which lead to an ‘authoritarian turn’, particularly concerning about the visions of social harmony within a post-democratization context that is impacted by religious violent extremism. As such extremism is experienced daily in Indonesia and elsewhere in the world, while there is an absence of effective state interventions or at least the fact that state is no longer perceived as the principle referent for security, there has been an exceptional trend of what I call ‘ref-ormas-i'. It indicates how non-state actors, more specifically Ormas (mass organizations) is taking the shape of providing people’s basic needs, professing security, promoting inter-religious tolerance, and even campaigning nationalism in the local, national, and global communities. This phenomenon certainly raises a question of how the non-state actors organize their role ‘acting like a state’ in society to produce new forms of ‘imagined communities’. Based on ethnographic fieldwork in two different Indonesian urban settings in Surabaya and Yogyakarta, this paper focuses on elaborating the roles of two different moderate Islamic groups, Banser and Jamaah Maiyah, more specifically on the discourses they use and the empirical actions they perform in securing the local community, defending the national ideology, and idealizing the global harmony through different interpretation of jihad and different approach of engagement in the society, more specifically for responding wide-spread religious extremism.

Keywords: banser; democratic transition; jamaah maiyah; jihad; new imagined communities; non-state actors

  1. Abrahamsen, Rita, and Michael C. Williams. 2009. “Security Beyond the State: Global Security Assemblages in International Politics.” International Political Sociology 3 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00060.x.
  2. Anam, Choirul. 1996. Gerak Langkah Pemuda Ansor: Seputar Sejarah Kelahiran. Jakarta: Duta Aksara Mulia.
  3. Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.
  4. Bakker, Laurens. 2015. “Illegality for the General Good? Vigilantism and Social Responsibility in Contemporary Indonesia.” Critique of Anthropology 35 (1): 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X14557092.
  5. Bayat, Asef. 2005. “Islamism and Social Movement Theory.” Third World Quarterly 26 (6): 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500089240.
  6. Beittinger-Lee, Verena. 2010. (Un)Civil Society and Political Change in Indonesia : A Contested Arena. New York: Routledge.
  7. Betts, Ian L. 2006. Jalan Sunyi Emha. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia.
  8. ———. 2016. “The Silent Pilgrimage: Then, Now and From Here to Where? Prospects and Opportunities for the Maiyah in A Globalised World.” Kenduricinta.Com. 2016. http://kenduricinta.com/v5/the-silent-pilgrimage-then-now-and-from-here-to-where-prospects-and-opportunities-for-the-maiyah-in-a-globalised-world/.
  9. Botz, Dan La. 2001. Made in Indonesia: Indonesian Workers Since Suharto. Cambridge, Massachusetts: South End Press.
  10. Daniels, Timothy. 2009. Islamic Spectrum in Java: Anthropology and Cultural History in Asia and the Indo-Pacific. New York: Ashgate Publishing.
  11. Denney, Lisa. 2012. Non-State Security and Justice in Fragile States: Lessons from Sierra Leone. ODI Briefing Paper. Vol. 73. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  12. Geertz, Clifford. 1996. “Religion as a Cultural System.” In Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. London: Tavistock.
  13. Gilani, Ijaz, Heald Johnny, and Marita Carballo. 2018. “Religion Prevails in the World.” Gallup International. 2018.
  14. Hefner, Robert W. 2013. “The Study of Religious Freedom in Indonesia.” Review of Faith and International Affairs 11 (2): 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2013.808038.
  15. Kamba, Nursamad. 2015. “Manusia Ihsan Dan Esensi Kekhalifahan.” Sufinews.Com. 2015. http://www.sufinews.com/manusia-ihsan-dan-esensi-ke-khalifahan/.
  16. ———. 2018. “Maiyah Dan Jalan Kenabian.” Buletin Maiyah Jawa Timu, 2018.
  17. Kleden, Ignas. 2003. “Religion, Peace and Conflict.” The Jakarta Post, 2003.
  18. Krause, Peter. 2013. “The Political Effectiveness of Non-State Violence: A Two-Level Framework to Transform a Deceptive Debate.” Security Studies 22 (2): 259–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2013.786914.
  19. Lipschutz, R. D. 2009. The Constitution of Imperium. Boulder: Paradigm.
  20. McChesney, Robert W. 2013. Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. New York: New Pess.
  21. Mietzner, Marcus. 2002. “Politics of Engagement: The Indonesian Armed Forces, Is-Lamic Extremism, and the War on Terror.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 9 (1): 71–84.
  22. Nadjib, Emha Ainun. 2016. Demokrasi La Roiba Fih. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia.
  23. Nordholt, H. Schulte. 2016. “From Contest State to Patronage Democracy: The Lounge Durée of Clientelism in Indonesia.” In Environment, Trade and Society in Southeast Asia, edited by D. Henley and H. Schulte Nordholt, 166–80. Leiden: Brill.
  24. Salim, Hairus. 2004. Kelompok Paramiliter NU. Jakarta: LKiS.
  25. Schirch, Lisa. 2015. “Ritual, Religion, and Peacebuilding.” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion, Conflict, and Peacebuilding, edited by Atalia Omer, 516–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Sternberg, R. J. 1988. The Triangle of Love. New York: Basic.
  27. Sumuranje, Nuhwan ML. 2013. Cinta Sejati Emha Buat Pak Harto. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Dipantara.
  28. Telle, Kari. 2013. “Vigilante Citizenship: Sovereign Practices and the Politics of Insult in Indonesia.” Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 169 (2–3): 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-12340029.
  29. Watts, Fraser, and Roger Bretherton. 2017. “‘Religion’ Is Complex and Diverse.” Religion, Brain and Behavior 7 (4): 378–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249930.
  30. Widiyanto, Asfa. 2016. Religious Authority and the Prospects for Religious Pluralism in Indonesia : The Role of Traditionalist Muslim Scholars. Zurich: Lit Verlag GmbH & Co. KG Wien.
  31. Wildman, Wesley J. 2011. “The Religious Violence Project.” In A Report to the 2010-2011 Edition of the Boston Uni-Versity Religion Fellows Program. Boston: Boston University and the Institute for the Biocultural Study of Religion.
  32. Wilson, Lee. 2017. “How Critical Can Critical Be? Contesting Security in Indonesia.” Critical Studies on Security 5 (3): 302–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2018.1424985

Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Ahmad Karim
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M)
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Rectorate Building, 3rd Floor
Jl. Prof. Hamka - Kampus 3, Tambakaji Ngaliyan 50185, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Email: walisongo@walisongo.ac.id

 

 
apps