Fear Appeal as Coercion Versus Persuasion in a Democracy: The Power of Islamic Discourse in the Indonesian Public Sphere

Peter Suwarno*  -  Arizona State University, United States

(*) Corresponding Author

While Indonesia claims to be the world’s third largest democracy, it recognizes itself as both a secular and religious state. The negotiation of the state-religion relationship influenced by Islamic discourse continues to shape the socio-political development of this largest Muslim nation. This paper describes how Indonesia’s discursive contention is molded by the power and popularity of Islamic discourses. It will present examples and analysis of appeal to fear as coercive discourses from recently published speech events, debates, edicts, regulations, and publications as well as examine the vital role of Islamic discourses in the Indonesian public sphere and democracy. This paper concludes that coercive religious discourses and some government policies not only marginalize the voices of minority and opposing groups, but also curtail participative critical debates that are necessary for a democratic Indonesia.

Keywords : coercion; democracy; equal participation; Islamic discourses; public sphere.

  1. Abdul Rahman. 2014. 1001 Siksa Kubur: Berdasarkan Al-Quran Dan As-Sunnah. Jakarta: Lembar Pustaka Indonesia.
  2. Agama Menjawab. 2018. Klarifikasi Quraish Shihab Tentang Ceramah Nabi Muhammad Tidak Dijamin Masuk Surga. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iN9aIwiWwp0&t=3s.
  3. Alhaddad, Gurais. 2019. “Istri Menolak Ajakan Suami Bercinta, Ini Hukumnya Dalam Islam: Okezone Muslim.” Muslim.okezone.com. 2019. https://muslim.okezone.com/read/2019/06/17/614/2067493/istri-menolak-ajakan-suami-bercinta-ini-hukumnya-dalam-islam.
  4. Alhafiz. 2016. “Kontroversi Pemimpin Non-Muslim, Ini Klarifikasi Pernyataan Kang Said.” 2016. https://www.nu.or.id/post/read/67660/kontroversi-pemimpin-non-muslim-ini-klarifikasi-pernyataan-kang-said.
  5. Andrews, James R. 1969. “Confrontation at Columbia: A Case Study in Coercive Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 55 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636909382923.
  6. Benih Iman Islam. 2019. Dilaknat Seluruh Malaikat Allah Swt Karena Makanan Haram & Syubhat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTx2HMFAE5Q.
  7. Bruinessen, Martin van. 2013. Contemporary Developments in Indonesian Islam Explaining the “Conservative Turn.” Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  8. Buehler, Michael. 2016. The Politics of Shari’a Law: Islamist Activists and the State in Democratizing Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. University of California Press.
  10. Cammack, Mark E., and R. Michael Feener. 2012. “The Islamic Legal System in Indonesia Islamic Law and Islamic Legal Professionals in Southeast Asia: Indonesia.” Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 21 (1): 13–42.
  11. Carney, James Donald. 1980. Fundamentals of Logic. 3rd ed.. New York: London: Macmillan; Collier Macmillan.
  12. Chew, Amy. 2017. “Jakarta Governor Race a Clash Between Moderates, Radicals.” Channel News Asia. 2017. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/jakarta-governor-race-a-clash-between-moderates-radicals-8601802.
  13. Copi, Irving Marmer. 1990. Introduction to Logic. 8th ed. / Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen. New York, N.Y. [etc.]: Macmillan.
  14. Costa, Agustinus Beo Da. 2019. “Indonesia Urges Public to Report Civil Servants Over ‘Radical’ Content.” Euro News. November 12, 2019. dil.
  15. Crowley, Sharon. 2006. Toward a Civil Discourse: Rhetoric and Fundamentalism. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  16. Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT [etc.]: Yale University Press.
  17. Fauzi. 2016. “Inilah Kriteria Berhak Tafsirkan Al-Qur’an.” NU Online. 2016. https://www.nu.or.id/post/read/73097/inilah-kriteria-berhak-tafsirkan-al-quran.
  18. Fealy, Greg. 2016. “Bigger than Ahok: Explaining the 2 December Mass Rally - Indonesia at Melbourne.” Indonesia at Melbourne. 2016. https://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/bigger-than-ahok-explaining-jakartas-2-december-mass-rally/.
  19. ———. 2018. “Indonesia’s Troubled Minorities.” The Sydney Morning Herald. September 13, 2018. https://www.smh.com.au/national/indonesia-s-troubled-minorities-20180913-p503i6.html.
  20. Feinberg, J. 1998. “Coercion.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York & London: Routledge.
  21. Foa, Edna B., and Michael J. Kozak. 1986. “Emotional Processing of Fear: Exposure to Corrective Information.” Psychological Bulletin 99 (1): 20.
  22. Glassner, Barry. 1999. The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things. New York: Basic Books.
  23. Habermas, Jürgen. 1962. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Politica: Abhandlungen und Texte zur politischen Wissenschaft; Bd. 4. Neuwied etc.: Herman Luchterhand Verlag.
  24. ———. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  25. Hasyim, Syafiq. 2015. “Majelis Ulama Indonesia and Pluralism in Indonesia.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 41 (4–5): 487–95.
  26. Hidayat, Avit. 2017. “Tolak Salatkan Pemilih Ahok, Ini Penjelasan Masjid Al-Jihad.” Tempo. February 25, 2017. https://metro.tempo.co/read/850113/tolak-salatkan-pemilih-ahok-ini-penjelasan-masjid-al-jihad.
  27. Ishadi, S. K. 2011. “Negotiating Mass Media Interests and Heterogeneous Muslim Audiences in the Contemporary Social-Political Environment of Indonesia.” In Islam and Popular Culture in Indonesia and Malaysia, edited by A. N. Weintraub, 37–61. Routledge.
  28. Jackson, Brian. 2007. “Jonathan Edwards Goes to Hell (House): Fear Appeals in American Evangelism.” Rhetoric Review 26 (1): 42–59.
  29. Kersten, Carool. 2015. Islam in Indonesia: The Contest for Society, Ideas and Values. London: Oxford University Press.
  30. Menchik, Jeremy. 2016. Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance without Liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
  31. ———. 2019. “The Politics of the Fatwa: Modern Islamic Legal Authority and Rise of the Indonesian Council of Ulama.” presented at the Gatty Lecture, Northwestern University.
  32. Mutiara Islami. 2018. Hukuman & Azab Meninggalkan Sholat 5 Waktu. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebDSETTD-o8.
  33. Oxford English. 2009. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Pfau, Michael. 2007. “Who’s Afraid of Fear Appeals? Contingency, Courage and Deliberation in Rhetorical Theory and Practice.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 40 (2): 216–37.
  35. Pino Galipat. 2015. Azab Bagi Perempuan Tidak Menutup Aurat 1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoXBLkz5B6s.
  36. Portal Islam. 2017. “Amien Rais: Jika Ahok Bebas, Jokowi Finish! Umat Islam Sudah Habis Kesabarannya.” 2017. https://www.portal-islam.id/2017/04/amien-rais-jika-ahok-bebas-jokowi.html.
  37. PortalMadura.com. 2018. “Inilah 13 Hukuman Bagi Orang yang Tidak Puasa di Bulan Ramadan.” kumparan.com. 2018. https://kumparan.com/redaksiportalmadura/inilah-13-hukuman-bagi-orang-yang-tidak-puasa-di-bulan-ramadan.
  38. Power, Thomas P. 2018. “Jokowi’s Authoritarian Turn and Indonesia’s Democratic Decline.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 54 (3): 307–38.
  39. Pratiwi, Priska Sari, and Prima Gumilang. 2016. “Rizieq Shihab ‘Ceramahi’ Jokowi.” 2016. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20161202123715-20-176837/rizieq-shihab-ceramahi-jokowi.
  40. Rawls, John. 1997. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” The University of Chicago Law Review 64 (3): 765–807.
  41. Ricklefs, Merle Calvin. 2012. Islamisation and Its Opponents in Java: A Political, Social, Cultural and Religious History, c. 1930 to the Present. Nus Press Singapore.
  42. Rosalia, Anggi. 2016. “7 Akibat Makan Makanan Haram dalam Islam.” DalamIslam.com. August 30, 2016. https://dalamislam.com/makanan-dan-minuman/makanan-haram/akibat-makan-makanan-haram.
  43. Rosidi, Muhammad Septi. 2014. Rasulullah Tak Dijamin Masuk Surga. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFiHeZqV6JE.
  44. Sahroji, Muhammad Ibnu. 2017. “Ancaman Bagi Orang Yang Meninggalkan Shalat.” NU Online. 2017. https://islam.nu.or.id/post/read/82848/ancaman-bagi-orang-yang-meninggalkan-shalat.
  45. Seo, Myengkyo. 2012. “Defining ‘Religious’ in Indonesia: Toward Neither an Islamic nor a Secular State.” Citizenship Studies 16 (8): 1045–58.
  46. Sheany. 2018. “Understanding the 212 Movement.” Jakarta Globe. 2018. https://jakartaglobe.id/news/understanding-212-movement.
  47. Smith, Mary John. 1982. Persuasion and Human Action: A Review and Critique of Social Influence Theories. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  48. Syukri, Ery. 2018. Azab Bagi Istri-Istri Durhaka. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLr3EN7_FOk.
  49. The ASEAN Post. 2019. “Why Jokowi Chose Ma’ruf Amin.” 2019. https://theaseanpost.com/article/why-jokowi-chose-maruf-amin.
  50. The Jakarta Post. 2019. “No Santa Hats?: Mall in Malang Advises Tenants against Displaying Christmas Accessories.” 2019. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/11/27/no-santa-hats-mall-in-malang-advises-tenants-against-displaying-christmas-accessories.html.
  51. Tim CNN Indonesia. 2019a. “Komik Siksa Neraka Dinilai Tak Ajarkan Dosa dengan Baik.” 2019. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/hiburan/20190511220126-241-394070/komik-siksa-neraka-dinilai-tak-ajarkan-dosa-dengan-baik.
  52. ———. 2019b. “Mengenang Komik Bertema Siksa Neraka yang Bikin Bergidik.” 2019. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/hiburan/20190511135341-241-393975/mengenang-komik-bertema-siksa-neraka-yang-bikin-bergidik.
  53. ———. 2019c. “Tito Karnavian Sebut Izin FPI Terkendala Visi NKRI Bersyariah.” 2019. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20191128151404-32-452321/tito-karnavian-sebut-izin-fpi-terkendala-visi-nkri-bersyariah.
  54. Tuasikal, Muhammad Abduh. 2017. “Khutbah Jumat: Petaka Bagi Muslimah Yang Buka Aurat.” Rumaysho.Com (blog). February 3, 2017. https://rumaysho.com/15330-khutbah-jumat-petaka-bagi-muslimah-yang-buka-aurat.html.
  55. Walton, Douglas. 2000. Scare Tactics: Arguments That Appeal to Fear and Threats. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  56. Wertheimer, Alan. 1987. Coercion. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  57. Woods, John. 1998. “Argumentum Ad Baculum.” Argumentation 12 (4): 493–504.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Indexed by

Journal Terindex di DOAJ Journal Terindex di EBSCO Journal Terindex di Crossref Journal Terindex di Sinta Journal Terindex di Google Scholar Journal Terindex di Academia Journal Terindex di Mendeley Journal Terindex di Leiden Journal Terindex di Base Journal Terindex di Garuda Journal Terindex di Moraref Journal Terindex di onesearch 

 


Copyright © 2020 Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, ISSN: 0852-7172 (p) 2461-064X (e)

Published by Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M), Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Walisongo No. 3-5 Semarang, Indonesia. Phone +6224 7601292 Email: walisongo@walisongo.ac.id

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
View My Stats
apps