Pemilihan Sekolah Swasta Berbasis Agama dalam Perspektif Angst Society

Nurhadi Nurhadi*  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

(*) Corresponding Author
There has been a sharp increase of the number of parents sending their children to religious-based private schools, ranging from early childhood education to that of high school, since the past three decades. In addition to the urban and peri-urban population, this trend has also been extending that of rural, in which individual decision making is presumed to be also strongly influenced by, or at least takes account seriously consideration made by, extended family. This research focuses on how parents come up with the decision to send their children to religious-based private school. Applying social network analysis, this research aims at understanding and explaining the process of socialization, dissemination, and the fortification of ideas on the importance of sending children to the religious-based private school. The results of this research are: First, there is the certain dominant perception among parents that the community and society at-large in which parents and their families belong to pose threats to the growth of children and teenagers. Second, there are certain negative perceptions on public and non-religious-based schools. The teaching of religious, moral, and virtuous values are considered as insufficient.

Keywords: decision-making process; dualistic families; perception of the external threat, religious capital; social network

  1. Ainsworth, James, ed. 2013. Sociology of Education: an A-to-Z guide, Volume 1. Los Angeles: Sage Reference.
  2. Asadullah, M. Niaz. 2018. “Madrasah for Girls and Private School for Boys ? The Determinants of School Type Choice in Rural and Urban Indonesia.” International Journal of Educational Development 62(November 2017):96–111.
  3. Binelli, Chiara dan Marta Rubio-Codina. 2013. “The Returns to Private Education : Evidence from Mexico.” Economics of Education Review 36:198–215.
  4. Bohle, Hans-georg. 2007. “Geographien von Verwundbarkeit.” Geographische Rundschau 2001:20–25.
  5. Coleman, James S. dan Thomas J. Fararo. 1992. “Introduction.” dalam Rational Choice Theory : Advocacy and Critique, ed. J. S. Coleman dan T. J. Fararo. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  6. Douglas, Mary. 1992. Risk and Blame : Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
  7. Giddens, Anthony. 1990. Consequences of Modernity. London: Polity Press.
  8. Heyns, Barbara. 1996. “This Little School Went to Market: Private Schooling in Post-Communist Poland.” dalam James S Coleman, ed. J. Clark. London: Routledge Falmer.
  9. Hodgetts, Darrin dan Kerry Chamberlain. 2014. “Analysing News Media.” dalam The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, ed. U. Flick. Sage Publications.
  10. Jacob, W. James dan Juhnan Ma. 2013. “Australia.” dalam Sociology of Education : an A-to-Z Guide. Volume I, ed. J. Ainsworth. Los Angeles: Sage Reference.
  11. Kemendikbud. 2016. Perbandingan Jumlah Sekolah Negeri dan Swasta. Jakarta.
  12. Longfield, David dan James Tooley. 2017. “School Choice and Parental Preferences in a Poor Area of Monrovia.” International Journal of Educational Development 53:117–27.
  13. Mandic, Sandra et al. 2017. “Enrolling in the Closest School or Not ? Implications of school choice decisions for active transport to school.” Journal of Transport & Health 6(March):347–57.
  14. Mariel, Petr, Riccardo Scarpa, dan Ainhoa Vega-bayo. 2018. “Joint Parental School Choice: Exploring the Influence of individual preferences of husbands and wives.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 68(February 2017):23–35.
  15. Rapley, Tim. 2014. “Sampling Strategies in Qualitative Research.” Hal. 49–63 in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, ed. U. Flick. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  16. Rosen, Lisa. 2003. “The Politics of Identity and the Marketization of U.S. Schools: How Local Meanings Mediate Global Struggles.” dalam Local Meanings, Global Schooling : Anthropology and World Culture Theory, ed. K. M. Anderson-Levitt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Sciortino, Rosalia dan Ines Smyth. 2002. “Mitos tentang Keselarasan : Kekerasan Rumah Tangga di Jawa.” dalam Order Zonder Order: Kekerasan dan Dendam di Indonesia 1965 - 1998, ed. F. Husken dan H. de Jong. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
  18. Scott, Alan. 2000. “Risk Society or Angst society? : Two Views of Risk, Consciousness and Community.” dalam The Risk Society and Beyond : Critical Issues for Social Theory, ed. B. Adam, U. Beck, dan J. Loon. London: Sage Publications.
  19. Sorensen, Aage B. 1996. “Educational Opportunities and School Effects.” dalam James S Coleman, ed. J. Clark. London: Routledge Falmer.
  20. Tangdilintin, Paulus. 2004. “Sekilas Perkembangan Kajian Keluarga Perkotaan.” dalam Bunga Rampai Sosiologi Keluarga, ed. T. Ihromi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  21. Vellos, Renira E. 2013. “General Typology: Alternative Schools and Programs.” dalam Sociology of Education: an A -to-Z Guide. Volume I, ed. J. Ainsworth. Los Angeles: Sage Reference.
  22. Williams, Trevor dan Peter Carpenter. 1991. “Private Schooling and Public Achievement in Australia.” International Journal of Educational Research 15(5):411–31.
  23. Willig, Carla. 2014. “Interpretation and Analysis.” pp. 136–50 in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, ed. U. Flick. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  24. Wisner, Ben, Piers Blaikie, Terry Cannon, dan Ian Davis. 2007. At Risk. London: Routledge.
  25. Yaacob, Noor Alyani, Mariana Mohamed Osman, dan Syahirah Bachok. 2014. “Factors Influencing Parents’ Decision in Choosing Private Schools.” pp. 242–53 dalam AMER International Conference on Quality of Life, vol. 153. Kota Kinabalu: Elsevier B.V.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Sociology Laboratory - Department of Sociology
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Central Java, Indonesia

 

 
apps