Demokrasi Patronase dan Praktik Politik Uang: Pengalaman Pemilu Legislatif 2014 di Kota Pelembang, Sumatera Selatan

Authors

  • Muhammad Mahsun Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/jpw.v2i1.1996

Keywords:

Money Politics, Patronase, Klientelisme, Pemilu Legislatif

Abstract

This study reveals the practices of money politics which took place in Indonesia’s electoral democracy and political network that helps the working of its parctices. The analysis unit of this study is based on practices of money politics conducted by the candidates in Palembang constituences for the South Sumatera provincial parliament in 2014 legislative election. Using qualitative method and political patronage theory, the important findings of this study reveals that money politics in 2014 legislative election becomes the dominan instrument used by candidates (incumbent and new comers) to mobilize electoral support, rather than ideology and programatic politics of the party and candidates. The practice of money politics is working in networks of political clientelism among candidates, brokers and voters are built through bonds of kinship, frienship and figures

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aspinall, Edward. 2013. “Money Politics: Patronag and Klientelism in Southeast Asia.” In Draft Paper 2013: For Wiliam Case (Ed), Routledge: HandBook of Democracy in Southeast Asia.

———. 2014a. Money Politics. dalam Insi. http://www.insideindonesia.org/weekly-articles/money-politics-2.

———. 2014b. “Parliament and Patronage.” Journal of Democracy 25(4): 96–110.

———. 2015. Politik Uang Di Indonesia Patronase Dan Klientelisme Pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014. ed. Mada Sukmajati. Yogyakarta: PolGov Press.

Kitschelt and Wilkinson. 2007. Patron, Client and Police: Pattern of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Mahsun, Muhammad. 2015. Kota Palembang, Sumatera Selatan: Dana Aspirasi Dan Politik Klientelisme. Dalam Poli. eds. Edward Aspinall and Mada Sukmajati. Yogyakarta: PolGov Press.

Noda, Kohe. 2011. Politization of Philippine Budget System: Institutional and Economic Analysis on “Pork Barel. Philipine: PRI Discussion Paper Series.

Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2007. Why Study Vote Buying. Elections. Philipine: Ateneo De manila University Press.

Stokes, Susan C. 2007a. Is Vote Buying Undemocratic?” In Frederic Charles Schaffer (Ed). Elections. Philipine: Ateneo De manila University Press.

———. 2007b. Political Clientelism. In Carles. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sumarto, Mulyadi. 2014. Perlindungan Sosial Dan Klientelisme Makna Politik Bantuan Sosial Dalam Pemilihan Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Taqwa, M. Ridhah. 2014. Pola Segregasi Ekologis: Kelompok Etnis-Suku Vs Kelas Sosial Di Kota Palembang. Palembang. http://sosiologi.fisip.unsri.ac.id/userfiles/Segergasi Ekologis Komunitas Kota Plbg.pdf.

Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-30

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).