Demokrasi Patronase dan Praktik Politik Uang: Pengalaman Pemilu Legislatif 2014 di Kota Pelembang, Sumatera Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/jpw.v2i1.1996Keywords:
Money Politics, Patronase, Klientelisme, Pemilu LegislatifAbstract
This study reveals the practices of money politics which took place in Indonesia’s electoral democracy and political network that helps the working of its parctices. The analysis unit of this study is based on practices of money politics conducted by the candidates in Palembang constituences for the South Sumatera provincial parliament in 2014 legislative election. Using qualitative method and political patronage theory, the important findings of this study reveals that money politics in 2014 legislative election becomes the dominan instrument used by candidates (incumbent and new comers) to mobilize electoral support, rather than ideology and programatic politics of the party and candidates. The practice of money politics is working in networks of political clientelism among candidates, brokers and voters are built through bonds of kinship, frienship and figures
Downloads
References
Aspinall, Edward. 2013. “Money Politics: Patronag and Klientelism in Southeast Asia.” In Draft Paper 2013: For Wiliam Case (Ed), Routledge: HandBook of Democracy in Southeast Asia.
———. 2014a. Money Politics. dalam Insi. http://www.insideindonesia.org/weekly-articles/money-politics-2.
———. 2014b. “Parliament and Patronage.” Journal of Democracy 25(4): 96–110.
———. 2015. Politik Uang Di Indonesia Patronase Dan Klientelisme Pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014. ed. Mada Sukmajati. Yogyakarta: PolGov Press.
Kitschelt and Wilkinson. 2007. Patron, Client and Police: Pattern of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Mahsun, Muhammad. 2015. Kota Palembang, Sumatera Selatan: Dana Aspirasi Dan Politik Klientelisme. Dalam Poli. eds. Edward Aspinall and Mada Sukmajati. Yogyakarta: PolGov Press.
Noda, Kohe. 2011. Politization of Philippine Budget System: Institutional and Economic Analysis on “Pork Barel. Philipine: PRI Discussion Paper Series.
Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2007. Why Study Vote Buying. Elections. Philipine: Ateneo De manila University Press.
Stokes, Susan C. 2007a. Is Vote Buying Undemocratic?” In Frederic Charles Schaffer (Ed). Elections. Philipine: Ateneo De manila University Press.
———. 2007b. Political Clientelism. In Carles. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sumarto, Mulyadi. 2014. Perlindungan Sosial Dan Klientelisme Makna Politik Bantuan Sosial Dalam Pemilihan Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Taqwa, M. Ridhah. 2014. Pola Segregasi Ekologis: Kelompok Etnis-Suku Vs Kelas Sosial Di Kota Palembang. Palembang. http://sosiologi.fisip.unsri.ac.id/userfiles/Segergasi Ekologis Komunitas Kota Plbg.pdf.
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the accepted article shall be assigned to the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to published articles.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In line with the license, authors and any users (readers and other researchers) are allowed to share and adapt the material only for non-commercial purposes. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
