Hijab in the Public Sphere of Muslim Countries in Southeast Asia, Media, State Rules, and Society Opinion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/jpw.v6i1.20883Keywords:
Public_Sphere, Southeast_Asia, Muslim_Countries, Hijab_Media, Hijab_State_rulesAbstract
This article aims to explain state regulations and media perspectives in Muslim-majority countries in Southeast Asia regarding the use of the hijab as a religious symbol in public spaces. The influence of globalization has increased diversity in the media landscape in the public sphere, going beyond traditional face-to-face interactions and encompassing the vast realm of the Internet. While Muslim women in secular Western countries face bans on wearing the hijab in public spaces, Muslim women in Muslim-majority countries in Southeast Asia face challenges regarding their style of wearing the hijab in public spaces. This research is qualitative research based on the study of public space and religion. The analysis was carried out in three Southeast Asian countries, namely Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei Darussalam, which have Muslim populations with different characteristics. Indonesia and Malaysia are multicultural regions but are dominated by Muslims, and Brunei is a country with a Muslim majority. These three countries have different patterns of managing religion in public spaces. Religious symbols in public spaces reflect the relationship between public space phenomena, the state, and the social context in a region. Social media has expanded the public sphere, providing greater opportunities for religious groups to present their arguments or engage in da'wah (religious outreach).
Downloads
References
Adil, M.A.M., Ahmad, N.M. (2016). “The Status and Implementation of Islamic Law in Malaysia.” In: Bottoni, R., Cristofori, R., Ferrari, S. (eds) Religious Rules, State Law, and Normative Pluralism - A Comparative Overview. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 18. Springer, Cham.
Aini, N., & Siscawati, M. (2023, May). “To Become Indonesian Women, You Have to Wear Jilbab.” In fourth Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, Arts and Humanities Stream (AHS-APRISH 2019) (pp. 499-513). Atlantis Press.
Ali, S. (2005). “Why here, why now? Young Muslim women wearing hijab.” MUSLIM WORLD-HARTFORD THEN OXFORD-, 95(4), 515.
Aljunied, K. (2016). Muslim cosmopolitanism: Southeast Asian Islam in comparative perspective. Edinburgh University Press.
Al Qurtuby, S. (2013). “Public Islam in Southeast Asia: Late modernity, resurgent religion, and Muslim politics.” Studia Islamika, 20(3), 399-442.
Anderson, J. W. (2003). “New media, new publics: Reconfiguring the public sphere of Islam.” Social Research: An International Quarterly, 70(3), 887-906.
Benson, R. (2009). “Shaping the public sphere: Habermas and beyond.” The American Sociologist, 40(3), 175-197.
Beta, A. R. (2014). “Hijabers: How young urban Muslim women redefine themselves in Indonesia.” International Communication Gazette, 76(4-5), 377-389.
Byng, M. D. (2010). “Symbolically Muslim: Media, Hijab, and the West.” Critical Sociology.
Calhoun, Craig. (2011). “Secularism, Citizenship, and the Public Sphere.” Rethinking secularism (Ed: Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer & J. VanAntwerpen). Oxford University Press.
Casanova, José. (2011). “The secular, secularizations, secularisms.” Rethinking secularism (Ed: Calhoun, M. Juergensmeyer & J. VanAntwerpen). Oxford University Press.
Dahlberg, L. (2005). “The Habermasian public sphere: Taking difference seriously?” Theory and Society, 34(2),111-136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4501718.
Davie, Grace. (2014). “Thinking Sociologically about Religion: a Step Change in the Debate?” Sociological Theory and the Question of Religion (Ed:
McKinnon, Andrew & Trzebiatowska, Marta). England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
de Sousa Santos, B. (2012). “Public sphere and epistemologies of the South.” Africa Development, 37(1), 43-67.
Dewi, K. H. (2017). “Piety and sexuality in a public sphere: Experiences of Javanese Muslim women’s political leadership.” Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 23(3), 340-362.
Eder, K. (2006). “The public sphere.” Theory, culture & society, 23(2-3), 607-611.
Eickelman, D. F., & Salvatore, A. (2002). “The public sphere and Muslim identities.” European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 43(1), 92-115.
Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. A., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). “Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies.” Theory and Society, 31(3), 289-324.
Fraser, N. (1995). “Politics, culture, and the public sphere: Toward a postmodern conception.” Social postmodernism: Beyond identity politics, 291, 295.
Fuchs, C. (2014). “Social media and the public sphere.” TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(1), 57-101.
Ghumman, S., & Ryan, A. M. (2013). “Not welcome here: Discrimination towards women who wear the Muslim headscarf.” Human Relations, 66(5), 671-698.
Göle, N. (2010). “Manifestations of the religious-secular divide: Self, state, and the public sphere.” Comparative secularisms in a global age, 41-53.
Habermas, J. (2006). “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy, 14: pp. 1–25.
Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964).” New German Critique, 3, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/487737.
Hassim, N. (2017). “Glocalizing’ the Hijab: a Malaysian perspective.” SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 33).
Hjarvard, S. (2011). “The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media, and social change.” Culture and religion, 12(02), 119-135.
Hochel, S. (2013). “To Veil or Not to Veil: Voices of Malaysian Muslim Women.” Intercultural Communication Studies, 22(2).
Mohamad, S. M., & Hassim, N. (2021). “Hijabi celebrification and Hijab consumption in Brunei and Malaysia.” Celebrity Studies, 12(3), 498-522.
MÜLLER, DOMINIK M. (2023). “Brunei Darussalam in 2016: The Sultan Is Not Amused.” Asian Survey, vol. 57, no. 1, 2017, pp. 199–205. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26367742.
Kalin, Ibrahim. (2011). “Islamophobia and the Limits of Multiculturalism” Islamophobia the Challenge of Pluralism in the 21st Century (Edited by Esposito, John L. and Kalin, Ibrahim). New York: Oxford University Press.
Keasberry, C. (2021). “Local Social Media Responses to Sharia Law in Brunei.” Engaging Modern Brunei: Research on language, literature, and culture, 255-267.
Köhrsen, J. (2012). “How religious is the public sphere? A critical stance on the debate about public religion and post-secularity.” Acta Sociologica, 55(3), 273-288.
Ni’mah, Z. (2021). “The political meaning of the hijab style of women candidates.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(1), 174-197.
Reese, S. D., & Shoemaker, P. J. (2016). “A media sociology for the networked public sphere: The hierarchy of influences model.” Mass Communication and Society, 19(4), 389-410.
Riesebrodt, Martin and Konieczny, Mary Ellen. (2005). “Sociology of Religion” p. 125—143. The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion (Edited by John R. Hinnels), Oxon: Routledge.
Rinaldo, R. (2008). “Envisioning the nation: Women activists, religion and the public sphere in Indonesia.” Social Forces, 86(4), 1781-1804.
Slama, M., & Barendregt, B. (2018). “Introduction: Online publics in Muslim Southeast Asia: In between religious politics and popular pious practices.” Asiascape: Digital Asia, 5(1-2), 3-31.
Trakic, A., & Tajuddin, H. H. A. (2021). Islamic Law in Malaysia. Springer Singapore.
Turner, B. S. (2014). “Religion and contemporary sociological theories.” Current Sociology, 62(6), 771-788.
Turner, B. S. (2011). Religion and modern society: Citizenship, Secularisation, and the state. Cambridge University Press.
Van der Noll, J. (2014). “Religious toleration of Muslims in the German public sphere.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 60-74.
Williams, J. P., & Kamaludeen, M. N. (2017). “Muslim girl culture and social control in Southeast Asia: Exploring the hijabista and hijabster phenomena.” Crime, media, culture, 13(2), 199-216.
Zaret, David. (1993). “Religion, Science, and Printing in the Public Spheres of England” by Habermas and the public sphere. Calhoun, C. (Ed.). MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).