Kontestasi Pasangan Suami Istri dalam Pilkades
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/jpw.v1i1.2338Keywords:
chief of village election, empty of ballot box, patriarchy, women subordinationAbstract
The Act Number 6 of 2014 cause of a great implication especially on the election of village chief. More over regarding on Ministerial Regulation Number 112 Year of 2014, article 23, which prohibit the single candidate opposing with the empty of ballot box. Thus, prohibition emerging of interesting phenomenon where is 17 couples of husband and wife being contestant on the village chief election in Demak Regency in the year of 2016. The aims of the reserch is to comprehend the husband’s reason to choose his wife as associate candidate. Do thus fact be part of practicing of women subordination? How the influence of thus phenomenon to the villlage democracy itself? The research uses qualitative-descriptive method with depth interview as instrument in collecting data. The result show that there are two main husband’s reason choose his wife as a competitor. Fisrt, by choosing his wife mean that there is no cost for compensation and no hard worry about conflict of interest in the coming day after election. Second, becoming his wife as a competitor mean that the winning opportunity is greater because patriarchy and Islamic tradition (were more joy in placing men as a leader) in Demak Regency. Then, the emerging of husband and wife as a candidate would decrease of democracy because there no rivalry as a soul of democracy. To improve of village chief election as a source of village democracy, it is best to correct the regulation which prohibit of the a single canditate by completing with require that the village chief election should be follow by at least two candidate who both of them have no relation as nuclear family.Downloads
References
Aminah, Siti. 2014. Kuasa Negara pada Ranah Politik Lokal. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Bhasin, K. 2006. What is Patriarchy? New Delhi: Women Unimited.
Dahl, Robert Alan. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=LRG7ngEACAAJ.
Downs, Anthony. 2001. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Faris, Ahmad. 2015. “Kepemimpinan Kiai dalam Mengembangkan Pendidikan Pesantren.” ’Anil Islam: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Ilmu Keislaman 8(1): 123–44. http://jurnal.instika.ac.id/index.php/
AnilIslam/article/view/17.
Huntington, Samuel P. 2001. Gelombang Demokratisasi Ketiga. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Koentjaraningrat. 2009. Pengantar Antropologi Pokok-pokok Etnografi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Lerner, Gerda. 1987. The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Millett, Kate. 1997. Sexual Politics. London: Virago.
Philip, G. 2011. Democracy and Democratisation. London: University of London.
Walby, Sylvia. 1990. Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).