Kontestasi Pasangan Suami Istri dalam Pilkades

Puji Astuti*  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Sulistyowati Sulistyowati  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Lusia Astrika  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
The Act Number 6 of 2014 cause of a great implication especially on the election of village chief. More over regarding on Ministerial Regulation Number 112 Year of 2014, article 23, which prohibit the single candidate opposing with the empty of ballot box. Thus, prohibition emerging of interesting phenomenon where is 17 couples of husband and wife being contestant on the village chief election in Demak Regency in the year of 2016. The aims of the reserch is to comprehend the husband’s reason to choose his wife as associate candidate. Do thus fact be part of practicing of women subordination? How the influence of thus phenomenon to the villlage democracy itself? The research uses qualitative-descriptive method with depth interview as instrument in collecting data. The result show that there are two main husband’s reason choose his wife as a competitor. Fisrt, by choosing his wife mean that there is no cost for compensation and no hard worry about conflict of interest in the coming day after election. Second, becoming his wife as a competitor mean that the winning opportunity is greater because patriarchy and Islamic tradition (were more joy in placing men as a leader) in Demak Regency. Then, the emerging of husband and wife as a candidate would decrease of democracy because there no rivalry as a soul of democracy. To improve of village chief election as a source of village democracy, it is best to correct the regulation which prohibit of the a single canditate by completing with require that the village chief election should be follow by at least two candidate who both of them have no relation as nuclear family.

Keywords : chief of village election;empty of ballot box;patriarchy, women subordination

  1. Aminah, Siti. 2014. Kuasa Negara pada Ranah Politik Lokal. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
  2. Bhasin, K. 2006. What is Patriarchy? New Delhi: Women Unimited.
  3. Dahl, Robert Alan. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=LRG7ngEACAAJ.
  4. Downs, Anthony. 2001. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
  5. Faris, Ahmad. 2015. “Kepemimpinan Kiai dalam Mengembangkan Pendidikan Pesantren.” ’Anil Islam: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Ilmu Keislaman 8(1): 123–44. http://jurnal.instika.ac.id/index.php/
  6. AnilIslam/article/view/17.
  7. Huntington, Samuel P. 2001. Gelombang Demokratisasi Ketiga. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
  8. Koentjaraningrat. 2009. Pengantar Antropologi Pokok-pokok Etnografi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  9. Lerner, Gerda. 1987. The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Millett, Kate. 1997. Sexual Politics. London: Virago.
  11. Philip, G. 2011. Democracy and Democratisation. London: University of London.
  12. Walby, Sylvia. 1990. Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 JPW - Jurnal Politik Walisongo
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Politik Walisongo
Published by Department of Political Science
Faculty of Social and Political Science
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III UIN Walisongo Semarang 
Website: https://fisip.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: jpw@walisongo.ac.id