Pilkada Langsung: Kisah Sukses dan Problematika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/jpw.v1i1.3351Keywords:
direct local election, indirect local election, coruption, expensiveAbstract
The implementation of direct local election has become important part of Indonesian society. This election is achievement of the reform. The public can finally vote for their head of the region (the local leaders) based on their own aspiration. The mechanism of this local election is somehow facing pro and contra between direct and indirect. It is considering the positive and negative impacts of the mechanism. The positive impact is to provide an opportunity for proposing their own people of the region to be candidate. This opportunity as a constitutional right of citizen regardless of race, ethnicity, and religion. Other results that there are number of regions are developed since this direct election able to produce several local leaders who are innovative and creative in developing their regions. In contrary, not few of the regional head are entangled with corruption cases. This is caused by the high cost of politics to achieve the seat of that regional head andco-head of the region. In addition, the cost to run the local election is also extremely expensive. Besides the local election socially triggers the horizontal conflict especially among the regional elites and its supporters. Different from the indirect local election that the cost is less. However,its has shortcoming that the regional head electedare not directly reflecting the aspirations of its people.
Downloads
References
Aritonang, Deytri Robekka. 2014. “Ketua Bawaslu: Ada Golput, Golongan Pencari Uang Tunai.” https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2014/02/11/1808582/Ketua.Bawaslu.Ada.Golput.Golongan.Pencari.Uang.Tunai (November 10, 2016).
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2014. Menegakan Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Badoh, Ibrahim Zuhdhy Fahmi. 2010. Kajian Potensi-Potensi Korupsi Pilkada. Jakarta.
Dianto, Dianto. 2013. “Pemilihan Kepala Daerah secara Langsung oleh Rakyat dan melalui DPRD: Studi Komparatif dalam Telaah Yuridis.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram. https://docplayer.info/7876-Jurnal-ilmiah-pemilihan-kepala-daerah-secara-langsung-oleh-rakyat-dan-melalui-dprd-studi-komparatif-dalam-telaah-yuridis.html.
DKPP RI. 2013. DKPP Outlook 2014: Refleksi dan Proyeksi. Jakarta.
———. 2014. DKPP Outlook 2015: Refleksi dan Proyeksi. Jakarta.
———. 2015. DKPP Outlook 2016: Refleksi dan Proyeksi. Jakarta.
Farchan, Yusa’, dan Partono Partono. 2016. “Problematika Pilkada Langsung; Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Pilkada Langsung di Provinsi Sumatera Utara 2005-2007.” Jurnal Renaissance 1(1): 33–48.
Fitriyah, Fitriyah. 2012. “Fenomena Politik Uang dalam Pilkada.” Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik 3(1): 5–14.
Haris, Syamsudin. 2003. Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah: Desentralisasi, Demokratisasi dan Akuntabilitas Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta: LIPI kerjasama PGRI, dan AIPI.
———. 2014. Masalah-Masalah Demokrasi Kebangsaan Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
Koirudin. 2005. Menuju Partai Advokasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Tokoh Bangsa.
Maesarini, Indah Wahyu. 2016. “Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia: Keberhasilan atau Kegagalan Pemerintah?” http://www.stiami.ac.id/jurnal/download/66/otonomi-daerah-di-indonesia-:-keberhasilan-atau-kegagalan-pemerintah.
Marijan, Kacung. 2010. “Demokrasi vs Efisiensi.” https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2010/12/23/
/demokrasi.vs.efisiensi.
Nurhasim, Moch. 2010. “Konflik dalam Pilkada Langsung: Studi tentang Penyebab dan Dampak Konflik.” Jurnal Penelitian Politik 7(2): 105–17.
Paat, Yustinus. 2015. “144 Pasangan Calon Daftar Gugatan ke MK.” https://www.beritasatu.com/
pilkada/335058-144-pasangan-calon-daftar-gugatan-ke-mk.html.
Purnomo, Wayan Agus, Danni, dan Eko. 2013. “Ini Daftar Kepala Daerah Tersandung Kasus Korupsi.” https://nasional.tempo.co/read/460207/ini-daftar-kepala-daerah-tersandung-kasus-korupsi/full&view=ok.
Romli, Lili. 2008. “Evaluasi Pilkada Langsung di Indonesia.” dalamYear Book 2007 - Democrazy Pilkada, ed. Pusat Penelitian Politik LIPI. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Sardini, Nur Hidayat. 2015. Mekanisme Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu. Jakarta: LP2AB.
———. 2016. “Rapat Koordinasi Evaluasi Sentra Gakumdu.”
Subroto, dan Chairul Akhmad. 2013. “Meraih Berkah Otonomi Daerah.” Republika Online. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/politik/13/08/01/mqt8g8-meraih-berkah-otonomi-daerah.
Sumanto, Ign. 2004. Pemilihan Presiden Secara Langsung 2004: Dokumentasi, Analisa dan Kritik. Jakarta: Ristek - CSIS.
Tim Liputan Kompas. 2010. “Biaya Pilkada Rp 15 Triliun.” https://nasional.kompas.com/read/
/07/24/03414390/twitter.com.
Tim Liputan Sayangi.com. 2013. “Lebih 90 Persen Pilkada Berakhir di MK.” https://www.sayangi.com/
/11/18/11033/news/lebih-90-persen-pilkada-berakhir-di-mk.
Zainuddin, Muhammad. 2015. Isu, Problematika, dan Dinamika Perekonomian, dan Kebijakan Publik: Kumpulan Essay, Kajian dan Hasil Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the accepted article shall be assigned to the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to published articles.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In line with the license, authors and any users (readers and other researchers) are allowed to share and adapt the material only for non-commercial purposes. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
