The Field of Cultural Production among Religious Community in Higher Education Institution

Ekky Megawangi Pertiwi*  -  Postgraduate Program of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Okta Hadi Nurcahyono    -  Department of Sociology and Anthropology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

The utilization practices of houses of worship in Benteng Pancasila Area of Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Surakarta can be seen as a field of cultural production by religious communities in an educational environment. This study aims to discover: how houses of worship on UNS Benteng Pancasila are utilized; how agents use capital to shape cultural production; and what social impacts are created. By applying a qualitative method with a case study as an approach, this study found that: the successfully constructed habitus leads to socio-cultural religious practices with academic nature; agents instill values through narratives using cultural, social, and symbolic capital and; the social impacts include inter-religious group integration, but the interaction within it is still limited. In this case, it was revealed that the social relations formed from cultural production are still limited on the symbolic level.

Keywords: the field of cultural production; houses of worship; religious community; religious diversity; religious practice

  1. Adon, Nasrullah Jamaludin. 2018. “Konflik dan Integrasi Pendirian Rumah Ibadah di Kota Bekasi.” Socio Politica 8(2):227–38.
  2. Atmaja, Hamdan Tri. 2014. “Keberadaan Keluarga TKW Jawa Timur Berbasis Arena Produksi Kultural.” Forum Ilmu Sosial 41(1):1–14. doi: 10.15294/fis.v41i1.5375.
  3. Bok, Jared. 2020. “Distinction through Religious Activism: How Capital Shapes the Organizational Repertoires of Transnational Protestant Outreach.” Sociology of Religion 81(3):294–318. doi: 10.1093/socrel/sraa001.
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2012. Arena Produksi Kultural Sebuah Kajian Sosiologi Budaya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
  6. Casram, Casram. 2016. “Membangun Sikap Toleransi Beragama dalam Masyarakat Plural.” Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya 1(2):187–98. doi: 10.15575/jw.v1i2.588.
  7. Çelik, Çetin. 2021. “Rethinking Institutional Habitus in Education: A Relational Approach for Studying Its Sources and Impacts.” Sociology 55(3):522–38. doi: 10.1177/0038038520966565.
  8. Colvin, Cassandra, Farida Fozdar, and Simone Volet. 2015. “Intercultural Interactions of Mono-Cultural, Mono-Lingual Local Students in Small Group Learning Activities: A Bourdieusian Analysis.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 36(3):414–33. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2013.823834.
  9. Creswell, JW. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  10. Fatmawati, Nur Ika. 2020. “Pierre Bourdieu dan Konsep Dasar Kekerasan Simbolik.” Madani: Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 12(1):41–60. doi: 10.52166/madani.v12i1.3280.
  11. Ginting, Harpindo Syah Putra Hilarion. 2019. “Novel Sang Pemimpi Karya Andrea Hirata: Analisis Habitus dan Modal dalam Arena Pendidikan.” Sintesis 13(1):47–56. doi: 10.24071/sin.v13i1.1910.
  12. Grenfell, Michael. 2010. Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts. Durham: Acumen.
  13. Hariani, Bhakti. 2022. “Perguruan Tinggi Berlomba Dirikan Tempat Ibadah Multi Agama di Kampus.” eduwara.com. Retrieved (https://eduwara.com/perguruan-tinggi-berlomba-dirikan-tempat-ibadah-multi-agama-di-kampus).
  14. Harker, Richard, Cheleen Mahar, and Chris Wilkes. 1990. An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu. 1st ed. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
  15. Jatmiko, Ruruh, and Muhammad Abdullah. 2021. “Habitus, Modal, dan Arena dalam Cerbung Salindri Kenya Kebak Wewadi Karya Pakne Puri Tinjauan Bourdieu.” Sutasoma: Jurnal Sastra Jawa 9(1):100–115. doi: 10.15294/sutasoma.v9i1.47060.
  16. Khoeron, Moh. 2022. “Tempat Ibadah Multiagama, Kemenag: Ada Fasilitas Ibadah Masing-Masing Agama di Kampus.” kemenag.go.id. Retrieved (https://www.kemenag.go.id/read/tempat-ibadah-multiagama-kemenag-ada-fasilitas-ibadah-masing-masing-agama-di-kampus-v3vzv).
  17. Krotofil, Joanna, Anna Piela, Katarzyna Górak-Sosnowska, and Beata Abdallah-Krzepkowska. 2021. “Theorizing the Religious Habitus in the Context of Conversion to Islam among Polish Women of Catholic Background.” Sociology of Religion 82(3):257–80. doi: 10.1093/socrel/srab002.
  18. Kunst, Jonas R., Lotte Thomsen, David L. Sam, and John W. Berry. 2015. “‘We are in this together’: Common Group Identity Predicts Majority Members’ Active Acculturation Efforts to Integrate Immigrants.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41(10):1438–53. doi: 10.1177/0146167215599349.
  19. Linda, Lisma. 2019. “Kekuasaan dan Kepentingan Internal Lembaga: Kajian Arena Produksi Kultural Bourdieu.” Aceh Anthropological Journal 3(2):157–77.
  20. Lowe, Sid, and Nirundon Tapachai. 2021. “Bourdieusian Interaction: Actors’ Habitus, Agentic Activities and Field Resources.” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 36(6):893–904. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-01-2020-0015.
  21. Nigam, Amit, Esther Sackett, and Brian Golden. 2022. “Duality and Social Position: Role Expectations of People who Combine Outsider-Ness and Insider-Ness in Organizational Change.” Organization Studies 43(3):413–35. doi: 10.1177/0170840621989004.
  22. Nilofar, Naila. 2020. “Arena Produksi Kultural Komunitas Pelangi Sastra Malang.” Alayasastra 16(1):119–33. doi: 10.36567/aly.v16i1.498.
  23. Normuslim, Normuslim. 2018. “Kerukunan Antar Umat Beragama Keluarga Suku Dayak Ngaju di Palangkaraya.” Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya 3(1):66–89. doi: 10.15575/jw.v3i1.1268.
  24. Nugroho, Rifkianto. 2022. “Kampus Ini Jadi yang Pertama Punya 6 Rumah Ibadah.” detik news. Retrieved (https://news.detik.com/foto-news/d-5885605/kampus-ini-jadi-yang-pertama-punya-6-rumah-ibadah).
  25. Nur, Askar. 2021. “The Culture Reproduction In the Charles Dickens’ Novel ‘Great Expectations’ (Pierre-Felix Bourdieu Theory).” International Journal of Cultural and Art Studies 5(1):10–20. doi: 10.32734/ijcas.v5i1.4866.
  26. Pribadi, Bowo. 2020. “Rektor UNS Resmikan Kawasan Pelopor dan Benteng Pancasila.” republika.co.id. Retrieved (https://www.republika.co.id/berita/q72swr335/rektor-uns-resmikan-kawasan-pelopor-dan-benteng-pancasila).
  27. Reinhart, Hilary. 2017. “Konflik Penambangan Batugamping Kecamatan Ponjong dalam Tinjauan Arena Bourdieu.” Jurnal Wilayah Dan Lingkungan 5(1):45–58. doi: 10.14710/jwl.5.1.45-58.
  28. Samiyono, David. 2017. “Membangun Harmoni Sosial: Kajian Sosiologi Agama tentang Kearifan Lokal sebagai Modal Dasar Harmoni Sosial.” JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo) 1(2):195–206. doi: 10.21580/jsw.2017.1.2.1994.
  29. Soro, Tommie. 2021. “How Symbolic Value Is Constructed through Utterances: Discursive Power and Performances of Reputation in the Field of Online Art Magazines.” Poetics 89(July 2020):101572. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101572.
  30. Sunaryo, Arie. 2019. “Bangun Klenteng, UNS Punya Tempat Ibadah 6 Agama.” merdeka.com. Retrieved (https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/bangun-klenteng-uns-punya-tempat-ibadah-6-agama.html).
  31. Syamsiyah, Nur. 2018. “Multikulturalisme Masyarakat Perkotaan.” Jurnal Sosiologi Fisip Unair 1–21.
  32. Szerląg, Alicja, Arkadiusz Urbanek, and Kamila Gandecka. 2021. “Three Strategies for Describing Social Interactions of Adolescents in a Multicultural Environment—Indicators for the Quality of Life Research.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(15):8166. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158166.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Sociology Laboratory - Department of Sociology
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Central Java, Indonesia

 

 
apps