Social Reactions toward Online Disclosure of Sexual Violence

Sarah Marchiani Nur Azijah*    -  Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; School of Social and Political Sciences, Faculty of Arts, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Desintha Dwi Asriani    -  Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/jsw.2023.7.2.17197

Many survivors of sexual violence have come forward to disclose their experiences on social media. The disclosure has generated positive and negative social reactions. Social media users either victimize sexual violence survivors or advocate against it, according to previous studies. This study aims to explore Twitter users’ social reactions to sexual violence disclosure and their narratives. This study used social network analysis and analyzed 1,678 tweets extracted from the Twitter search function. This study discovers two major themes and twelve subthemes of social reactions. New subthemes emerged: condemnation, curiosity, and sharing experiences (positive social reactions) and humor (negative social reactions). The narratives within negative social reactions brought digital harm to sexual violence survivors with prejudice, hostility, and normalization of sexual violence. Meanwhile, positive social reactions represent resistance by challenging harmful users and the authority and retelling sexual violence experiences to a bigger audience. This study provides input to design policy interventions to guide social media users in responding to sexual violence disclosures.

Keywords: digital harms; everyday resistance; online disclosure; sexual violence; social reaction

  1. Alaggia, Ramona, and Susan Wang. 2020. “‘I Never Told Anyone until the #metoo Movement’: What Can We Learn from Sexual Abuse and Sexual Assault Disclosures Made through Social Media?” Child Abuse & Neglect 103:104312. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104312.
  2. Alifiarry, Muhammad Ananda, and Bevaola Kusumasari. 2021. “The Application of Social Movement as a Form of Digital Advocacy: Case of #TolakRUUPermusikan.” Journal of Government and Civil Society 5(1):1–30. doi: 10.31000/jgcs.v5i1.2991.
  3. Ayers, John W., Theodore L. Caputi, Camille Nebeker, and Mark Dredze. 2018. “Don’t Quote Me: Reverse Identification of Research Participants in Social Media Studies.” Npj Digital Medicine 1(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0036-2.
  4. Bivens, Rena. 2015. “Under the Hood: The Software in Your Feminist Approach.” Feminist Media Studies 15(4):714–17. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1053717.
  5. Bogen, Katherine W., Kaitlyn Bleiweiss, and Lindsay M. Orchowski. 2019. “Sexual Violence Is #NotOkay: Social Reactions to Disclosures of Sexual Victimization on Twitter.” Psychology of Violence 9(1):127–37. doi: 10.1037/vio0000192.
  6. Bogen, Katherine W., Lindsay M. Orchowski, and Sarah E. Ullman. 2021. “Online Disclosure of Sexual Victimization and Social Reactions: What Do We Know?” Women & Therapy 44(3–4):358–73. doi: 10.1080/02703149.2021.1961448.
  7. Carretta, Carrie M., Ann W. Burgess, and Rosanna DeMarco. 2015. “To Tell or Not to Tell.” Violence Against Women 21(9):1145–65. doi: 10.1177/1077801215590672.
  8. Chitsamatanga, Bellita, Nomthandazo Ntlama-Makhanya, and Oliver Chair. 2021. “Is Naming and Shaming the Perpetrators of Sexual Violence a Sacrilege? The Nascent Voices of Senior Female Students at a South African University.” Gender and Behaviour 18(3):16339–413.
  9. Dey, Adrija. 2020. “‘Me Too’ and the ‘List’ – Power Dynamics, Shame, and Accountability in Indian Academia.” IDS Bulletin 51(2):63–80. doi: 10.19088/1968-2020.130.
  10. Dworkin, Emily R., Charlotte D. Brill, and Sarah E. Ullman. 2019. “Social Reactions to Disclosure of Interpersonal Violence and Psychopathology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Clinical Psychology Review 72:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101750.
  11. Easter, Brandee. 2018. “‘Feminist_brevity_in_light_of_masculine_long-Windedness:’ Code, Space, and Online Misogyny.” Feminist Media Studies 18(4):675–85. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447335.
  12. Elmira, Putu. 2022. “Ramai Pelecehan Seksual di Kereta Api Solo-Jakarta, KAI Beri Tanggapan.” Liputan6.Com. Retrieved (https://www.liputan6.com/lifestyle/read/4991362/ramai-pelecehan-seksual-di-kereta-api-solo-jakarta-kai-beri-tanggapan).).
  13. Fairbairn, Jordan. 2020. “Before #MeToo: Violence against Women Social Media Work, Bystander Intervention, and Social Change.” Societies 10(3):51. doi: 10.3390/soc10030051.
  14. Filipas, Henrietta H., and Sarah E. Ullman. 2001. “Social Reactions to Sexual Assault Victims from Various Support Sources.” Violence and Victims 16(6):673–92.
  15. Forman, Jane, and Laura Damschroder. 2007. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” pp. 39–62 in Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer (Advances in Bioethics). Vol. 11, edited by L. Jacoby and L. A. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  16. Gaunt, Ruth. 2013. “Ambivalent Sexism and Perceptions of Men and Women who Violate Gendered Family Roles.” Community, Work & Family 16(4):401–16. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2013.779231.
  17. Hamami, Nurul. 2022. “Kampanye Cegah Tindak Kekerasan Seksual di Kereta Api Serentak di Berbagai Kota.” kereta.republika.co.id. Retrieved (https://kereta.republika.co.id/posts/160991/kampanye-cegah-tindak-kekerasan-seksual-di-kereta-api-serentak-di-berbagai-kota).
  18. Harris, Bridget, and Laura Vitis. 2020. “Digital Intrusions: Technology, Spatiality and Violence against Women.” Journal of Gender-Based Violence 4(3):325–41. doi: 10.1332/239868020X15986402363663.
  19. Himelboim, Itai. 2017. “Social Network Analysis (Social Media).” pp. 1–15 in The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. New Jersey: Wiley.
  20. Hosterman, Alec R., Naomi R. Johnson, Ryan Stouffer, and Steven Herring. 2018. “Twitter, Social Support Messages, and the #MeToo Movement.” The Journal of Social Media in Society 7(2):69–91.
  21. Johnson, Nicole L., and Dawn M. Johnson. 2021. “An Empirical Exploration Into the Measurement of Rape Culture.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(1–2):NP70–95. doi: 10.1177/0886260517732347.
  22. Keller, Jessalynn, Kaitlynn Mendes, and Jessica Ringrose. 2018. “Speaking ‘Unspeakable Things’: Documenting Digital Feminist Responses to Rape Culture.” Journal of Gender Studies 27(1):22–36. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2016.1211511.
  23. KemenPPPA. 2021. Survei Pengalaman Hidup Perempuan Nasional 2021. Jakarta: Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak RI.
  24. Li, Manyu, Nadia Turki, Cassandra R. Izaguirre, Chloe DeMahy, Brooklyn Labery Thibodeaux, and Taylor Gage. 2021. “Twitter as a Tool for Social Movement: An Analysis of Feminist Activism on Social Media Communities.” Journal of Community Psychology 49(3):854–68. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22324.
  25. Lilja, Mona. 2022. “Pushing Resistance Theory in IR beyond ‘Opposition’: The Constructive Resistance of the #MeToo Movement in Japan.” Review of International Studies 48(1):149–70. doi: 10.1017/S0260210521000541.
  26. Lilja, Mona, Mikael Baaz, and Stellan Vinthagen. 2013. “Exploring ‘Irrational Resistance.’” Journal of Political Power 6(2):201–17. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2013.809212.
  27. Lilja, Mona, and Evelina Johansson. 2018. “Feminism as Power and Resistance: An Inquiry into Different Forms of Swedish Feminist Resistance and Anti-Genderist Reactions.” Social Inclusion 6(4):82–94. doi: 10.17645/si.v6i4.1545.
  28. Littleton, Heather L., Danny Axsom, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, and Abbey Berenson. 2006. “Rape Acknowledgment and Postassault Experiences: How Acknowledgment Status Relates to Disclosure, Coping, Worldview, and Reactions Received From Others.” Violence and Victims 21(6):761–78. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.21.6.761.
  29. Lockyer, Sharon, and Heather Savigny. 2020. “Rape Jokes Aren’t Funny: The Mainstreaming of Rape Jokes in Contemporary Newspaper Discourse.” Feminist Media Studies 20(3):434–49. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2019.1577285.
  30. Lorenz, Katherine, Sarah E. Ullman, Anne Kirkner, Rupashree Mandala, Amanda L. Vasquez, and Rannveig Sigurvinsdottir. 2018. “Social Reactions to Sexual Assault Disclosure: A Qualitative Study of Informal Support Dyads.” Violence Against Women 24(12):1497–1520. doi: 10.1177/1077801217732428.
  31. Marwick, Alice. 2013. “Gender, Sexuality, and Social Media.” pp. 67–83 in The Social Media Handbook. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  32. Megarry, Jessica. 2014. “Online Incivility or Sexual Harassment? Conceptualising Women’s Experiences in the Digital Age.” Women’s Studies International Forum 47(PA):46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.012.
  33. Moors, Rosetta, and Ruth Webber. 2013. “The Dance of Disclosure: Online Self-Disclosure of Sexual Assault.” Qualitative Social Work 12(6):799–815. doi: 10.1177/1473325012464383.
  34. Orchowski, Lindsay M., Amy S. Untied, and Christine A. Gidycz. 2013. “Social Reactions to Disclosure of Sexual Victimization and Adjustment Among Survivors of Sexual Assault.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28(10):2005–23. doi: 10.1177/0886260512471085.
  35. Page, Tiffany, Anna Bull, and Emma Chapman. 2019. “Making Power Visible: ‘Slow Activism’ to Address Staff Sexual Misconduct in Higher Education.” Violence Against Women 25(11):1309–30. doi: 10.1177/1077801219844606.
  36. Poell, Thomas. 2020. “Social Media, Temporality, and the Legitimacy of Protest.” Social Movement Studies 19(5–6):609–24. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2019.1605287.
  37. Putri, Diva Lutfiana. 2022. “Ramai Soal Pelecehan Seksual di KA Argo Lawu, Ini Kronologi dan Penjelasan KAI.” Kompas.Com. Retrieved (https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2022/06/20/152500365/ramai-soal-pelecehan-seksual-di-ka-argo-lawu-ini-kronologi-dan-penjelasan?page=al).
  38. Roberts, Ron E., and Robert Marsh Kloss. 1979. Social Movements. Between the Balcony and the Barricade. St. Louis: Mosby.
  39. Santoso, Bangun, and Achmad Fauzi. 2022. “Viral Pelecehan Seksual di Kereta Api, Begini Respons KAI’.” Suara.Com. Retrieved (https://www.suara.com/bisnis/2022/06/20/115951/viral-pelecehan-seksual-di-kereta-api-begini-respons-kai).
  40. Seelig, Michelle I., Diane Millette, Chun Zhou, and Jialing (Catherine) Huang. 2019. “A New Culture of Advocacy: An Exploratory Analysis of Social Activism on the Web and Social Media.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 27(1):15–29. doi: 10.1080/15456870.2019.1540418.
  41. Sills, Sophie, Chelsea Pickens, Karishma Beach, Lloyd Jones, Octavia Calder-Dawe, Paulette Benton-Greig, and Nicola Gavey. 2016. “Rape Culture and Social Media: Young Critics and a Feminist Counterpublic.” Feminist Media Studies 16(6):935–51. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1137962.
  42. Steinberg, Stacey B. 2016. “#Advocacy: Social Media Activism’s Power to Transform Law.” Ky. L. J. 105(413).
  43. Stubbs-Richardson, Megan, Nicole E. Rader, and Arthur G. Cosby. 2018. “Tweeting Rape Culture: Examining Portrayals of Victim Blaming in Discussions of Sexual Assault Cases on Twitter.” Feminism & Psychology 28(1):90–108. doi: 10.1177/0959353517715874.
  44. Suran, Emily. 2014. “Title IX and Social Media: Going Beyond the Law.” Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 21(21.2):273. doi: 10.36641/mjgl.21.2.title.
  45. Thomae, Manuela, and G. Tendayi Viki. 2013. “Why Did the Woman Cross the Road? The Effect of Sexist Humor on Men’s Rape Proclivity.” Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 7(3):250–69. doi: 10.1037/h0099198.
  46. Ullman, Sarah E. 2000. “Psychometric Characteristics of the Social Reactions Questionnaire: A Measure of Reactions to Sexual Assault Victims.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 24(3):257–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00208.x.
  47. Ullman, Sarah E. 2010. Talking about Sexual Assault: Society’s Response to Survivors. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  48. Vinthagen, Stellan, and Anna Johansson. 2013. “‘Everyday Resistance’: Exploration of a Concept and Its Theories.” Resistance Studies Magazine 1:1–46.
  49. Yang, Guobin. 2016. “Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlackLivesMatter.” Media and Communication 4(4):13–17. doi: 10.17645/mac.v4i4.692.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Sociology Laboratory - Department of Sociology
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Central Java, Indonesia

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

free web stats View My Stats
 
apps