Ideology Contestation in Management of University Library Development

Nurdin Laugu*  -  LIS Department, Faculty of Adab and Cultural Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Library collection development is mostly studied as professionalism based on a positivistic paradigm neglecting constructivist based paradigm. This constructivist base is reflected in various factors, such as ideology and commodification, which influence collection development. This research aims to investigate ideological contestation and commodification of institutions and audiences related to the collection development of Muhammadiyah University library. The ideological contestation was examined using Giddens’ structuration and Bourdieu’s habitus. The research data was collected from interviews with five informants from librarians and library directors. The data were supported by observation and documentation. The data obtained were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman technique based on three stages: reduction, display, and conclusion/verification. The results of the research found three formations in contestation, i.e. internal institutions, external institutions, and professionalism of librarians. The internal institution represented by the UMY Library encountered with outside institutions, such as American Corner, Iranian Corner, and publishers. Meanwhile, librarians show their professionalism in facing the ideological domination of those institutions through various strategies regarding the development of library collection.

Keywords : ideology; contestation; collection development; commodification, Muhammadiyah

  1. Abdullah, Irwan. 2009. Konstruksi dan Reproduksi Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  2. Althusser, Louis. 2014. On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. London: Verso.
  3. Asyari, Suaidi. 2009. Nalar Politik NU & Muhammadiyah. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
  4. Barker, Chris. 2004. The Sage Dictionary of Cultural Studies. London: Sage Publication.
  5. Barker, Chris. 2005. Cultural Studies Theory and Practice. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  6. Barthes, Roland. 1981. Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. New York: Routledge.
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. California: Stanford University Press.
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: The New Press.
  11. Buschman, John E. 2003. Dismantling the Public Sphere: Situating and Sustaining Librarianship in the Age of the New Public Philosophy. London: Libraries Unlimited.
  12. Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. 1997. Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication. Pvt. Ltd.
  13. Eagleton, Terry. 2006. Teori Sastra: Sebuah Peng-antar Komprehensif. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  14. Evans, G. Edward. 2000. Developing Library and Information Center Collections. London: Libraries Unlimited.
  15. Fatmawati, Endang, Wening Udasmoro, and Ratna Noviani. 2017. “Representation of Library Spaceas Pragmatic Space and Ideological Contestation.” Libraria: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi 6(1):13–28.
  16. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Malden: Polite Press.
  17. Grenfell, Michael. 2010. Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts. Durham: Acumen.
  18. Harker, Richard, Cheelen Mahar, and Chris Wilkes, eds. 2005. (Habitus X Modal) + Ranah = Praktik: Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  19. IFLA. 2019. “About the Acquisition and Collection Development Section.” IFLA.org. Retrieved (https://www.ifla.org/about-the-acquisition-collection-development-section).
  20. Johnson, Peggy. 2018. Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management. Chicago: ALA.
  21. Kroeber, A. L., and C. Kluckhohn. 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Cambridge: The Museum.
  22. Lappegård, Trude, Eva Bernhardt, and Frances Goldscheider. 2017. “Introduction to the Special Collection on Finding Work-Life Balance: History, Determinants, and Consequences of New Bread-Winning Models in the Industrialized World.” Demographic Research 37(26):853–866.
  23. Laugu, Nurdin. 2015. Representasi Kuasa dalam Pengelolaan Perpustakaan: Studi Kasus Pada Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi Islam di Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Gapernus Press.
  24. Leckie, Gloria J., and John E. Buschman. 2009. Information Technology in Librarianship: New Critical Approaches. London: Libraries Unlimited.
  25. Leckie, Gloria J., Lisa M. Given, and John E. Buschman. 2010. Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. California: Libraries Unlimited.
  26. Malagueño, Ricardo, Sudarshan Pillalamarri, Amaury José Rezende, and Marcelo Botelho da Costa Moraes. 2019. “The Effects of Length of Service and Ethical Ideologies on Moral Development and Behavioral Intentions.” Journal of Applied Accounting Research ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print).
  27. Margolis, Eric, and Stephen Laurence. 2007. Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Margulies, Jared D. 2018. “The Conservation Ideological State Apparatus.” Conservation and Society 16(2):181–92.
  29. Mosco, Vincent. 1996. The Political Economy of Communication: Rethinking and Renewal. London: Sage Publications.
  30. Mulkhan, Abdul Munir. 2010. Ahmad Dahlan: Jejak Pembaharuan Sosial dan Kemanusiaan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
  31. Pawley, Christine. 2017. “‘Missionaries of the Book’ or ‘Central Intelligence’ Agents: Gender and Ideology in the Contest for Library Education in Twentieth-Century America.” Libraries: Culture, History, and Society 1(1):72–96.
  32. Smith, Kevin B., John R. Alford, John R. Hibbing, Nicholas G. Martin, and Peter K. Hatemi. 2017. “Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology.” American Journal of Political Science 61(2):424–37.
  33. Storey, John. 1993. An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  34. Sugiono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  35. Sutrisno, Mudji and Hendar Putranto. 2005. Teori-Teori Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
  36. Vidal, Sergi, and Johannes Huinink. 2019. “Introduction to the Special Collection on Spatial Mobility, Family Dynamics, and Gender Relations.” Demographic Research 41(21):593–616.
  37. Wijayanti. 2018. “Perpustakaan Sebagai Arena Kontestasi Kepentingan: Studi Kasus Pe-ngelolaan American Corner di Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta dan Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
  38. Williams, Raymond. 1987. Marxism and Litera¬ture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Yu, Liangzhi. 2019. “Towards Structure-Agency Integrative Theories for Information Access Disparity.” Journal of Documentation 75(3):458–77.
  40. Yusniah, Yusniah. 2019. “Praktik Kuasa dan Kepemimpinan di Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.” Nusantara Journal of Information and Library Studies 2(1):67–77.
  41. Zerek, Bogdan Filip. 2014. The Preservation and Protection of Library Collection: A Practical Guide to Microbiological Controls. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

free
web stats
View My Stats


JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)

Published by Laboratorium Sosiologi - Program Studi Ilmu Sosiologi
FISIP Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with APSSI - Asosiasi Program Studi Sosiologi Indonesia
(Association of Study-Program of Sociology Indonesia)


 

 
apps