Dislokasi Identitas Agama dan Budaya Perkotaan: Perkembangan Kampung Wisata di Kota Yogyakarta

Zaenuddin Hudi Prasojo*  -  (Scopus ID 36731458100) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak, Indonesia
Muhammad Arifin  -  Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia
Irwan Abdullah  -  (Scopus ID 57204549651) Departemen Antropologi, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Since the early 20th century, villages in the city of Yogyakarta has started to become villages of tourism following the government promoting tourism in the region. Originally carrying local and cultural identities, those villages appear to be touristic, accommodating the needs of the visitors. This work attempts to explore how this social phenomenon happening to two urban villages within the city namely Kampung Kauman and Kampung Prawirotaman. It focuses on explaining how the villagers actively play their roles in the neighborhood in social and cultural processes within the new environment and physical space.  The appropriate data found in the field is analyzed accordingly to the research questions by employing a qualitative approach.  The work suggests that cultural identity has changed in these two urban villages as a result of the influence of external values promoting the redefinition and redesign of public and social space. Besides, it also finds that delegitimization of the identity of Kampung and communality dislocation has occurred due to tourism purposes. The new formulation of the Kampung does not only reflect the emergence of new ideology and tradition but also stimulate resistance, conflict, and negotiation. This study recommends the importance of mentoring programs from the strategic stakeholders for better space and cultural transformation leading to the prevention of the damage of local wisdom basis within urban communities.

Keywords: tourism village; cultural identity; contested space; Yogyakarta

  1. Abdurrachman, Surjomihardjo. 2000. Kota Yogya-karta, 1880-1930: Sejarah Perkembangan Sosial. Ed. A. Setiono dan A. Samhuri. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Untuk Indonesia.
  2. Alam, Lukis. 2018. “Popular Piety and the Muslim Middle Class Bourgeoisie in Indonesia.” Al-Albab 7(2):237.
  3. Anonim. 2016. “Kampung Prawirotaman, Rumah Kedua Bule-Bule di Jogja yang Sudah Populer di Manca.” Yogyalagi.com. Diambil (http://www.yogyalagi.com/2016/03/kampung-prawirotaman-rumah-kedua-bule.html).
  4. Ardhiansyah, Nino, Dhyah Ayu Retno Widyastuti, dan Elisabet Dita Septiari. 2019. “Perubahan Tata Guna Lahan Kampung Prawirotaman Kota Yogyakarta sebagai Dampak Keberadaan Kawasan Komersial.” Arteks: Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur 3(2):149–58.
  5. Aryanti, Tutin. 2015. “Branding the Islamic Village: Modesty and Identity in Yogyakarta Kauman Village, Indonesia.” pp. 126–34 dalam Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 184. Elsevier B.V.
  6. Chawari, Muhammad. 2017. “Data Baru tentang Kampung Kauman Yogyakarta Studi Berdasarkan Temuan Artefaktual.” Berkala Arkeologi 37(2):181–94.
  7. Dahles, Heidi dan Titi Susilowati Prabawa. 2013. “Entrepreneurship in the Informal Sector. The Case of the Pedicab Drivers of Yogyakarta, Indonesia.” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 26(3):241–59.
  8. Darban, Ahmad Adaby. 1984. “Kampung Kauman: Sebuah Tipologi Kampung Santri di Perkotaan Jawa (Studi Perbandingan Sejarah Pertumbuhan Kampung Kauman Kudus dan Yogyakarta).” Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
  9. Darban, Ahmad Adaby. 2000. Sejarah Kauman: Menguak Identitas Kampung Muhammadiyah. Yogyakarta: Tarawang.
  10. Depari, Catharina Dwi Astuti. 2012. “Transformasi Ruang Kampung Kauman Yogyakarta Sebagai Produk Sinkretisme Budaya.” Jurnal Arsitektur Komposisi 10(1):11–26.
  11. GudegNet. 2016. “Rindu Ruang: Prawirotaman Car Free Night Yogya.” GudegNet. Diambil (https://www.gudeg.net/hiburan-2/3808/rindu-ruang--prawirotaman-car-free-night.html).
  12. Hernadi, Nour Ardiansyah. 2020. “Prawirotaman as Kampung Inggris and the Improvement of Students Motivation in Learning English for Tourism Students In Yogyakarta.” Kepariwisataan: Jurnal Ilmiah 14(1):37–44.
  13. Hill, Kate. 1999. “Thoroughly Imbued with the Spirit of Ancient Greece: Symbolism and Space inVictorian Civic Culture.” in Gender, Civic Culture and Consumerism: Middle Class Identity in Britain 1800-1940, Ed. A. Kidd dan D. Nicholls. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  14. Huda, Lailatul. 2012. “Wanita Kauman Pengrajin Batik Kesultanan Yogyakarta 1900-1930.” Al-Manar 6(2):1–18.
  15. Hutama, Irsyad Adhi Waskita. 2016. “Exploring the Sense of Place of an Urban Through the Daily Activities, Configuration of Space and Dweller’s Perception: Case Study of Kampung Code, Yogyakarta.” University of Twente Netherlands.
  16. Kuntowijoyo. 1991. Paradigma Islam. Bandung: Mizan.
  17. Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Ed. D. Nicholson-Smith. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
  18. Low, Setha M. 1996. “Spatializing Culture: The Social Production and Social Construction of Public Space in Costa Rica.” American Ethnologist 23(4):861–79.
  19. Muhammad, Nadrah. 2017. “Butulan dan Jepitan sebagai Ruang Liminal dalam Budaya Jawa Islam di Perkampungan Kauman Yogjakarta.” Etnohistori: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebudayaan dan Kesejarahan 4(2):179–90.
  20. Nakamura, Mitsuo. 1983. Bulan Sabit Muncul dari Balik Pohon Beringin: Studi tentang Pergerakan Muhammadiyah di Kotagede Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  21. Narulita, Siska. 2004. “Sejarah Koperasi Batik PPBI Yogyakarta 1950-1980.” Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta.
  22. Nas, Peter J. M., Marlies de Groot, dan Michelle Schut. 2011. “Introduction: Variety of Symbols.” pp. 7–25 in Cities Full of Symbols: A Theory of Urban Space and Culture, Ed. P. J. M. Nas. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
  23. Rianingrum, Cama Juli, Agus Sachari, dan Pribadi Widodo. 2014. “Tradition Concept in Kauman Yogyakarta Settlement as a Representation of Javanese Cultural Values.” Arts and Design Studies 14.
  24. Sativa, Sativa. 2012. “Konsep Teritori Kampung Kauman Yograkarta.” Inersia 8(2):110–16.
  25. Simonsen, Kirsten. 1996. “What Kind of Space in What Kind of Social Theory?” Progress in Human Geography 20(4):494–512.
  26. Stevenson, Deborah. 2003. Cities and Urban Cultures. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  27. Sullivan, John. 1986. “Kampung and State: The Role of Government in the Development of Urban Community in Yogyakarta.” Indonesia (41):63–88.
  28. Sumintarsih dan Ambar Andrianto. 2014. Dinamika Kampung Kota Prawirotaman dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Balai Pelestarian Nilai Budaya (BPNB) Yogyakarta.
  29. Tania, Devi Johana, Agus Suharjono Ekomadyo, dan Denny Zulkaidi. 2018. “Transformasi Kampung Turis Menjadi Kampung Wisata Studi Kasus: Prawirotaman Yogyakarta.” in Prosiding Seminar Kota Layak Huni/Livable Space.
  30. Triatmodjo, Suastiwi. 2012. “Dua Ragam Makna pada ‘Ruang dari Masa Lalu’ di Permukiman Kauman Yogyakarta.” Tsaqafa: Jurnal Kajian Seni Budaya Islam 1(1):19–37.
  31. Utami, Aulia Nastiti dan Ragil Haryanto. 2015. Kajian Keterkaitan Usaha Pendukung Akomodasi dengan Penginapan. Vol. 4.
  32. Utomo, Yunanto Wiji. 2019. “Prawirotaman: Kampung Batik dan Penginapan yang Mendunia.” Yogyes.com, September 16.
  33. Wardhana, Retno. 2016. “Kampung Prawirotaman, Yogya Rasa Bali.” travel.detik.com, Desember 6.
  34. Wirakusuma, Reiza Miftah. 2014. “Analisis Karakter Wisatawan Mancanegara terhadap Fasilitas Wisata Kawasan Prawirotaman.” Jurnal Pariwisata 1(1):42–51.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Sociology Laboratory - Department of Sociology
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Central Java, Indonesia

 

 
apps