The Paradox of Masculinity: The Narrative Identities among the Elderly in Yogyakarta

Oktarizal Drianus*    -  Faculty of Da’wa and Islamic Communication, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung, Bangka, Indonesia
Elli Nur Hayati    -  Faculty of Psychology, Unversitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/jsw.2021.5.2.7848
The hegemony of masculinity tends to benefit more on one side, man. It is interesting to observe the change of masculinity in men with time. The dynamics proceeded to pertain to the psychological, economic, social, and symbolic representation. This study aimed to reveal both the narrative identities of elderly masculinity and the psychological dynamics that accompanied the lifespan of an older man. This study used hermeneutic-phenomenological approaches, with critical narrative analysis developed from Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutics. Five older men, who live in a geriatric house in Yogyakarta, participated in this study. The results showed that the face of elderly masculinity was paradoxical masculinity. At the ideal level, the older men appropriated hegemonic masculinity but at the level of reality, they were in the marginalized masculinity position. Masculine subjects had experienced the maturation effect of togetherness with their wife. Wife has been an important subject and medium for growing the elderly masculinity and maintaining traditional manhood. The Paradox and their intersection with the complexity of the psychological dynamics made older men offer wiser masculinity and transform into positive masculinity such as gratitude, acceptance of life, sincerity, and caring.

Keywords: elderly masculinity; hegemonic masculinity; marginal masculinity; phenomenological-hermeneutics; paradoxical masculinity

  1. Aboim, Sofia. 2016. Plural Masculinities: The Remaking of the Self in Private Life. New York: Routledge.
  2. Affleck, William, Umaharan Thamotharampillai, Judy Jeyakumar, and Rob Whitley. 2018. “‘If One Does Not Fulfil His Duties, He Must Not Be a Man’: Masculinity, Mental Health and Resilience Amongst Sri Lankan Tamil Refugee Men in Canada.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 42(4):840–61. doi: 10.1007/s11013-018-9592-9.
  3. Andaya, Barbara Watson. 2020. “Bringing the Gender History of Early Modern Southeast Asia into Global Conversations.” pp. 319–34 in A Companion to Global Gender History. Wiley.
  4. Asadi, Muhammed. 2015. “The Sexuality Transition: Premarital Sex, the Nuclear Family, and ‘Doing’ Gender.” Women’s Studies 44(1):23–53. doi: 10.1080/00497878.2014.971216.
  5. Atoyebi, Oladele, Andrew Wister, Barbara Mitchell, and Andrew Sixsmith. 2019. “A Reformulation and Assessment of the Global AgeWatch Wellbeing Index: Inclusion of a Gender-Based Domain.” Journal of Population Research 36(4):365–90. doi: 10.1007/s12546-019-09232-x.
  6. Aziz, Safrudin. 2017. “Tradisi Pernikahan Adat Jawa Keraton Membentuk Keluarga Sakinah.” Ibda’: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Budaya 15(1):22–41. doi: 10.24090/ibda.v15i1.724.
  7. Bai, Xue. 2014. “Images of Ageing in Society: A Literature Review.” Journal of Population Ageing 7(3):231–53. doi: 10.1007/s12062-014-9103-x.
  8. Barrett, Frank J., and Stephen M. Whitehead. 2001. The Masculinities Reader. London: Polity Press.
  9. Bear, Julia B., and Peter Glick. 2017. “Breadwinner Bonus and Caregiver Penalty in Workplace Rewards for Men and Women.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 8(7):780–88.
  10. Bengtson, Vern L., and Richard Settersten Jr. 2016. Handbook of Theories of Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  11. Bennett, Linda Rae, and Sharyn Graham Davies, eds. 2015. Sex and Sexualities in Contemporary Indonesia Sexual Politics, Health, Diversity and Representations. New York: Routledge.
  12. Berdahl, Jennifer L., Marianne Cooper, Peter Glick, Robert W. Livingston, and Joan C. Williams. 2018. “Work as a Masculinity Contest.” Journal of Social Issues 74(3):422–48. doi: 10.1111/josi.12289.
  13. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Masculine Domination. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  14. BPS RI. 2015. “Statistik Penduduk Lanjut Usia 2014: Hasil Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional.” Retrieved (https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2015/11/02/e8375b9b7a8e0d380a1fd1da/statistik-penduduk-lanjut-usia-2014.html).
  15. Bruzzi, Stella. 2019. Bringing Up Daddy: Fatherhood and Masculinity in Postwar Hollywood. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  16. Buchbinder, David. 2013. Studying Men and Masculinities. London: Routledge.
  17. Calasanti, Toni. 2004. “Feminist Gerontology and Old Men.” The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 59(6):S305–14. doi: 10.1093/geronb/59.6.S305.
  18. Chapman, Rowena, and Jonathan Rutherford. 2014. Male Order: Menguak Maskulinitas. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  19. Clark, Jeff. 2008. “Philosophy, Understanding and the Consultation: A Fusion of Horizons.” British Journal of General Practice 58(546): 58–60. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X263929.
  20. Connell, R. W. 2005. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
  21. Connell, R. W., and James W. Messerschmidt. 2005. “Hegemonic Masculinity.” Gender & Society 19(6): 829–59. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639.
  22. Cordella, Marisa, and Aldo Poiani. 2021. “The Social Dimension of Older Ages.” pp. 461–632 in Fulfilling Ageing. Cham, Swiss: Springer.
  23. Creighton, Genevieve M., Mariana Brussoni, John L. Oliffe, and Christina Han. 2017. “Picturing Masculinities: Using Photoelicitation in Men’s Health Research.” American Journal of Men’s Health 11(5):1472–85. doi: 10.1177/1557988315611217.
  24. Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2009. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
  25. Erlina, Erlina. 2020. “The Healing Corridor: A Critical Phenomenology of Severe Illness, Impairment and Care in Java.” The Australian National University.
  26. Fakih, Mansour. 1996. Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  27. Fernandes, Ilda, Fabrícia Neves, Patrícia Guimarães, Karla Maria Rolim, Firmina Hermelinda Albuquerque, Luisa Andrade, and Rejane Milliones. 2020. “Socio¬demographic Profile of Depression in the Elderly in Brasil: Integrative Review.” Millenium - Journal of Education, Techno¬logies, and Health 12(2):79–84. doi: 10.29352/mill0212.07.00305.
  28. Flood, Michael. 2002. “Between Men and Masculinity: An Assessment of the Term ‘Masculinity’ in Recent Scholarship on Men.” in Manning the next millennium: Studies in masculinities, edited by S. Pearce and V. Muller. Bentley: Black Swan Press.
  29. Fromm, Erich. 2014. The Essential Fromm: Life between Having and Being. New York: Open Road Media.
  30. Fromm, Erich, and Thomas Burton Bottomore. 2004. Marx’s Concept of Man. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  31. Frost, Nollaig. 2011. Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology: Combining Core Approaches. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
  32. Gee, James Paul. 1991. “A Linguistic Approach to Narrative.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 1(1):15–39. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.1.1.03ali.
  33. Gee, James Paul. 1992. The Social Mind: Language, Ideology, and Social Practice. New York: Bergin and Garvey.
  34. Gilligan, Carol. 1993. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  35. Gilligan, Carol. 2018. “Revisiting ‘In a Different Voice.’” LEARNing Landscapes 11(2):25–30.
  36. Gilligan, Carol, and Naomi Snider. 2018. Why Does Patriarchy Persist? New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  37. Gilmore, David D. 1990. Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  38. Handayani, Christina S., and Ardhian Novianto. 2004. Kuasa Wanita Jawa. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
  39. Hasyim, N., A. P. Kurniawan, and E. N. Hayati. 2011. Menjadi Laki-laki: Pandangan Laki-laki Jawa tentang Maskulinitas dan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga. Yogyakarta: Rifka Annisa.
  40. Hayati, Elli N., Maria Emmelin, and Malin Eriksson. 2014. “‘We No Longer Live in the Old Days’: A Qualitative Study on the Role of Masculinity and Religion for Men’s Views on Violence within Marriage in Rural Java, Indonesia.” BMC Women’s Health 14(1):58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-58.
  41. Haywood, C., and M. M. Ghaill. 2003. Men and Masculinities: Theory, Research, and Social Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  42. Hearn, Jeff, and Linn Sandberg. 2009. “Older Men, Ageing and Power: Masculinities Theory and Alternative Spatialised Theoretical Perspectives.” Sextant: Revue Du Groupe Interdisciplinaire d’etudes Sur Les Femmes et Le Genre 27:147–63.
  43. Hermawan, Ferry Fauzi. 2017. “Masculinity in Indonesian Popular Culture in the Early Era of the New Order Regime.” Lingua Cultura 11(1):47–52. doi: 10.21512/lc.v11i1.1318.
  44. Hester, Grant C. 2019. “Male Bonding: A Queer Analysis of the James Bond Canon.” Florida Atlantic University.
  45. Heuser, Christoph, and Jürgen Howe. 2019. “The Relation between Social Isolation and Increasing Suicide Rates in the Elderly.” Quality in Ageing and Older Adults 20(1):2–9. doi: 10.1108/QAOA-06-2018-0026.
  46. Huysamen, Monique. 2020. “‘There’s Massive Pressure to Please Her’: On the Discursive Production of Men’s Desire to Pay for Sex.” The Journal of Sex Research 57(5):639–49. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1645806.
  47. Ismail, Sharifah Fazliyaton Shaik. 2014. “In Pursuit of Mr. Right: Constructed Masculinities in Malay Teen Magazine.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 155:477–83. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.325.
  48. Jackson, David. 2016. Exploring Aging Masculinities: The Body, Sexuality and Social Lives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  49. Kimmel, Michael. 2008. The Gendered Society. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  50. Langdridge, Darren. 2007. Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method. London: Pearson Education.
  51. Messerschmidt, James W., and Michael A. Messner. 2018. “Hegemonic, Nonhegemonic, and ‘New’ Masculinities.” pp. 35–56 in Gender Reckonings. New York: New York University Press.
  52. Oliffe, John L., Genevieve Creighton, Steve Robertson, Alex Broom, Emily K. Jenkins, John S. Ogrodniczuk, and Olivier Ferlatte. 2017. “Injury, Interiority, and Isolation in Men’s Suicidality.” American Journal of Men’s Health 11(4):888–99. doi: 10.1177/1557988316679576.
  53. Pennartz, Paul, and Anke Niehof. 2019. The Domestic Domain: Chances, Choices and Strategies of Family Households. London: Routledge.
  54. Permanadeli, Risa. 2015. Dadi Wong Wadon: Representasi Sosial Perempuan Jawa di Era Modern. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ifada.
  55. Pietilä, Ilkka, Hanna Ojala, Neal King, and Toni Calasanti. 2013. “Aging Male Bodies, Health and the Reproduction of Age Relations.” Journal of Aging Studies 27(3):243–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.04.001.
  56. Poerwandari, E. K. 2013. Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Penelitian Manusia. Depok: LPSP3 UI.
  57. PSKK UGM. 2016. Kondisi Sosiodemografis Penduduk Lansia di Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan UGM.
  58. Robertson, Steve, Brendan Gough, Esmée Hanna, Gary Raine, Mark Robinson, Amanda Seims, and Alan White. 2016. “Successful Mental Health Promotion with Men: The Evidence from ‘Tacit Knowledge’: Table 1:” Health Promotion International 33(2):334–344. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw067.
  59. Scott-Baumann, Alison. 2009. Ricoeur and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  60. Séguin, Léa J., and Martin Blais. 2019. “Pleasure Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg: Social Representations, Personal Beliefs, and Attributed Meanings to Partnered Orgasm.” The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality 28(3):328–42. doi: 10.3138/cjhs.2019-0027.
  61. Spinelli, Ernesto. 2005. The Interpreted World: An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology. London: SAGE Publishing.
  62. Stripling, Ashley Mae. 2011. “"Old Talk”: An Examination of Reports of Self-Referential and Ageist Speech across Adulthood.” University of Florida, Florida.
  63. Tur-Prats, Ana. 2021. “Unemployment and Intimate Partner Violence: A Cultural Approach.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 185:27–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.02.006.
  64. VanLeeuwen, Charlene A., Linyuan Guo-Brennan, and Lori E. Weeks. 2017. “Conducting Hermeneutic Research in International Settings: Philosophical, Practical, and Ethical Considerations.” Journal of Applied Hermeneutics 1–23. doi: 10.11575/jah.v0i0.53309.
  65. Walby, Sylvia. 1990. Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.
  66. Wang, Yafeng, and Chuanchuan Zhang. 2018. “Gender Inequalities in Labor Market Outcomes of Informal Caregivers near Retirement Age in Urban China.” Feminist Economics 24(2):147–70. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2017.1383618.
  67. WHO. 2015. World Report on Ageing and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  68. Willig, Carla, and Wendy Stainton Rogers. 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. London: SAGE Publishing.
  69. Wulan, Nur. 2013. “Does Phallic Masculinity Still Matter?: Masculinities in Indonesian Teenlit During the Post-Reformasi Period (1998-2007).” The Journal of Men’s Studies 21(2):149–61. doi: 10.3149/jms.2102.149.
  70. Wulandari, Ratna Dwi, S. Supriyanto, Bagus Qomaruddin, and Agung Dwi Laksono. 2019. “Socioeconomic Disparities in Hospital Utilization among Elderly People in Indonesia.” Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development 10(11): 2192. doi: 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.03885.3.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Sociology Laboratory - Department of Sociology
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Central Java, Indonesia

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

free web stats View My Stats
 
apps