Embeddedness of Economic Actions in the Social Network: Study among of Local Genuine Entrepreneurship in Cirebon, West Java

Haryono Haryono*  -  Department of Communication and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia
Mukhtar Mukhtar  -  School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
Titik Sumarti    -  Department of Communication and Community Development Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia
Didin S. Damanhuri  -  Department of Economics and Environmental Resources, Faculty of Economics and Management, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia
Sofyan Sjaf    -  Department of Communication and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

The purpose of this study was to analyze the attachment of economic activity in social networks among entrepreneurs in Cirebon, West Java, Indonesia. This research was conducted in Cirebon Regency, for a period of 6 months, from May to October 2019. This research method uses a qualitative approach. The results of the study found that: first, local entrepreneurs (genuine) in the rattan business sector have been running for a very long time. Second, as a result of historical formation, there is a wide network both between entrepreneurs and between entrepreneurs with certain institutions and community structures. Thrid, the map of economic network attachment in social networks shows the diversity of attachments between economic networks and social networks.

Keywords: Cirebon; social network; embeddedness of economic actions; entrepreneurs

  1. Abbas, Anwar. 2015. “Agama dan Kehidupan Ekonomi Menurut Sjafruddin Prawiranegara.” Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics 5(1):65–78. doi: 10.15408/aiq.v5i1.2110.
  2. Alexandrescu, Filip M., Erika Rizzo, Lisa Pizzol, Andrea Critto, and Antonio Marcomini. 2016. “The Social Embeddedness of Brownfield Regeneration Actors: Insights from Social Network Analysis.” Journal of Cleaner Production 139:1539–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.007.
  3. Anwar, Muhammad Fathul. 2021. “Analisis Daya Saing Furniture Rotan Indonesia ke Negara Tujuan Inggris dan Italia.” Agrisantifika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian 5(1):47–55. doi: 10.32585/ags.v5i1.1616.
  4. Bosworth, Gary, and Roger Turner. 2018. “Interrogating the Meaning of a Rural Business through a Rural Capitals Framework.” Journal of Rural Studies 60:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.02.002.
  5. BPS Kabupaten Cirebon. 2009. “Kabupaten Cirebon dalam Angka 2005.” Retrieved (https://cirebonkab.bps.go.id/publication/2009/01/01/afb24b3040c2cdc3a1c94ad6/kabupaten-cirebon-dalam-angka-2005.html).
  6. BPS Kota Cirebon. 2009. “Kota Cirebon dalam Angka 2003.” Retrieved (https://cirebonkota.bps.go.id/publication/2009/01/01/a0b2ccffb44f24629373c7bc/kota-cirebon-dalam-angka-2003.html).
  7. BPS Kota Cirebon. 2012. “Kota Cirebon dalam Angka 2012.” Retrieved (https://cirebonkota.bps.go.id/publication/2012/10/23/ca70c84b3c862f0a023b0652/kota-cirebon-dalam-angka-2012.html).
  8. Chamberlain-Salaun, Jennifer, Jane Mills, and Kim Usher. 2013. “Linking Symbolic Inter-actionism and Grounded Theory Methods in a Research Design.” SAGE Open 3(3):1–10. doi: 10.1177/2158244013505757.
  9. Czernek-Marszałek, Katarzyna. 2020. “Social Embeddedness and Its Benefits for Cooperation in a Tourism Destination.” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 15:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.100401.
  10. Dana, Léo Paul, and Veland Ramadani, eds. 2015. Family Businesses in Transition Economies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  11. Granovetter, Mark. 2005. “The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(1):33–50. doi: 10.1257/0895330053147958.
  12. Granovetter, Mark, and Richard Swedberg. 2011. The Sociology of Economic Life. New York: Routledge.
  13. Greenberg, Zeevik, Yanay Farja, and Eli Gimmon. 2018. “Embeddedness and Growth of Small Businesses in Rural Regions.” Journal of Rural Studies 62:174–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.07.016.
  14. Harms, Henrik. 2014. “Review of Family Business Definitions: Cluster Approach and Implications of Heterogeneous Application for Family Business Research.” International Journal of Financial Studies 2(3):280–314. doi: 10.3390/ijfs2030280.
  15. Hidayanti, Ika Agung. 2006. “Analisis Ekspor Industri Kerajinan Rotan di Sentra Industri Kerajinan Rotan Kabupaten Cirebon Jawa Barat [Undergraduate Thesis].” Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
  16. Jamilah, Joharotul, Arya Hadi Dharmawan, Nurmala K. Panjaitan, and Didin S. Damanhuri. 2016. “Keterlekatan Etika Moral Islam dan Sunda dalam Bisnis Bordir di Tasikmalaya.” Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 4(3):233–41. doi: 10.22500/sodality.v4i3.14432.
  17. Lenggono, Setia P. 2018. “Pembentukan Pengusaha Lokal dalam Industri Perikanan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kesejahteraan Sosial 2(01):27–42. doi: 10.31326/jks.v2i01.150.
  18. Maulana, Achmad Subchiandi, Rita Nurmalina, and Suharno Suharno. 2017. “Analisis Daya Saing Ekspor Komoditas Kursi Rotan dan Mebel Rotan Indonesia di Pasar Internasional [Master Thesis].” Instutut Pertanian Bogor.
  19. Menteri Perdagangan RI. 2005. Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan RI No. 12/M-DAG/PER/6/2005 tentang Ketentuan Ekspor Rotan.
  20. Menteri Perdagangan RI. 2011. Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan RI No. 35/M-DAG/PER/11/2011 tentang Ketentuan Ekspor Rotan dan Produk Rotan.
  21. Menteri Perdagangan RI. 1986. Surat Keputusan Menperdag No. 274/KP/X/1986, tentang Larangan Ekspor Segala Bentuk Rotan Bulat Dan Setengah Jadi.
  22. Nuruddin, Sabara. 2018. “Islam in Gantarangkeke: The Encounter of Cultural Identities.” JICSA (Journal of Islamic Civilization in Southeast Asia) 7(1):147–73. doi: 10.24252/jicsa.v7i1.6733.
  23. Rustandi, Yudi, Setya Handayani, Indah Listiana, and Dafit Ariyanto. 2019. “Agribusiness Activity at Islamic Boarding School Al Ittifaq Ciwidey-Bandung Using Interactive Models.” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering 9(1):1418–24. doi: 10.35940/ijitee.A4140.119119.
  24. Said, Muhazzab. 2015. “A Study on the Acculturation of Islam and Local Culture.” JICSA (Journal of Islamic Civilization in Southeast Asia) 4(2):76–100. doi: 10.24252/jicsa.v4i2a6.
  25. Sandee, Henry, Brahmantio Isdijoso, and S. Sulandjari. 2003. SME Clusters in Indonesia: An Analysis of Growth Dynamics and Employment Conditions. Jakarta: ILO.
  26. Tregear, Angela, and Sarah Cooper. 2016. “Embeddedness, Social Capital and Learning in Rural Areas: The Case of Producer Cooperatives.” Journal of Rural Studies 44:101–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.011.
  27. Yip, Jeffrey, Kyle Ehrhardt, Hunter Black, and Dayna O. Walker. 2018. “Attachment Theory at Work: A Review and Directions for Future Research.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 39(2):185–98. doi: 10.1002/job.2204.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

free web stats  View My Stats

JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo)
Published by Laboratorium Sosiologi - Program Studi Ilmu Sosiologi
FISIP Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with APSSI - Asosiasi Program Studi Sosiologi Indonesia
(Association of Study-Program of Sociology Indonesia)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
 
apps