Beyond Formality in Indonesian Pretrial Law: KUHAP Reform, Human Rights, and Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2025.35.2.28399Keywords:
human rights, Islamic criminal law, KUHAP reform, pretrial reviewAbstract
Indonesia's pretrial system has long faced challenges, including formalistic procedures, limited judicial oversight, and potential violations of suspects' rights. The Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014 expanded pretrial review, especially regarding suspect designation. Yet, gaps remain in implementation, legal certainty, and due process. This study aims to critically evaluate the reconfiguration of Indonesia's pretrial mechanism by integrating human rights principles, Islamic criminal law, and KUHAP reform. Employing doctrinal analysis of legislation, case law, and jurisprudence, complemented with comparative insights from Malaysia, Egypt, and Türkiye, the research examines how procedural fairness and accountability can be strengthened. Findings reveal persistent weaknesses in judicial control, repeated suspect status, and post factum review. Integrating positive law, human rights, and Islamic law principles such as ḥisba, qāḍī al-maẓālim, al-bayyina, and dar’ al-ḥudūd bi al-shubuhāt can enhance procedural justice. Recommendations include clearer pretrial codification, substantive judicial oversight, and adoption of Islamic law insights to build a more equitable, rights-oriented pretrial framework in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Abdul Aziz, Norazlina, Mazlina Mohamad Mangsor, Nur Ezan Rahmat, Mastika Nasrun, and Rosa Ristawati. “An Overview of Judicial Review in The Malaysian Court.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 13, no. 1 (January 14, 2023): 336–52. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/16182.
Amin, Khoirul. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penetapan Status Tersangka Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” JOSH: Journal of Sharia 3, no. 01 (January 28, 2024): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.55352/josh.v3i01.572.
Ardhanariswari, Riris, Eko Nursetiawan, Syarafina Dyah Amalia, Enny Dwi Cahyani, and Rozlinda Mohamed Fadzil. “Upholding Judicial Independence through the Practice of Judicial Activism in Constitutional Review: A Study by Constitutional Judges.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 6, no. 2 (December 27, 2023): 183–207. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i2.9565.
Beneldus, Bernard Noel, Ain Shafikah Mohd Ripin, Lim Jia Jia, Siti Nursyafiqah Hamdan, Syazliyana Izzaty Syamsul Ikram, Shazwi Sabidi, and Hanifah Haydar Ali Tajuddin. “Upholding The Rights of Arrested Individuals: A Comparison Between Malaysia and the United Kingdom’s Legal Framework.” Current Legal Issues (CLI) 7, no. 1 (2025): 1–21. https://ejournal.ukm.my/cli/article/view/90552/0.
Burhanuddin, Burhanuddin, Wahyuniar Wahyuniar, and Maskawati Maskawati. “Law Enforcement in the Perspective of Legal Sociology.” International Journal of Sociology and Law 1, no. 3 (November 26, 2024): 243–52. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsl.v1i3.286.
Butt, Simon. “Why Do Indonesian Judges Dissent?” Australian Journal of Asian Law 23, no. 1 (2022): 1–19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4263219.
Çalı, Başak, and Betül Durmuş. “Judicial Self-Government as Experimental Constitutional Politics: The Case of Turkey.” German Law Journal 19, no. 7 (December 1, 2018): 1671–1706. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200023208.
Choiruddin, Rahmad Riyan, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, and Sukinta. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penetapan Status Tersangka sebagai Perluasan Objek Praperadilan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 2 (2016): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.10860.
Fatoni, Syamsul, Erma Rusdiana, Imron Rosyadi, and Opik Rozikin. “Asas Proporsionalitas: Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Maqosid Syariah dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 32, no. 1 (January 31, 2025): 46–71. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss1.art3.
Ginting, Dandy Alfayed, Alvi Syahrin, Mahmud Mulyadi, and Marlina Marlina. “The Court’s Ruling on the Determination of Suspect Status by a Pretrial Judge as a Development in Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law.” International Journal of Nusantara Law and Policy 1, no. 2 (2023): 83–92. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/ijnlp/article/view/394.
Gottschalk, Petter. “From Crime Convenience to Punishment Inconvenience: The Case of Detected White-Collar Offenders.” Deviant Behavior 42, no. 8 (August 3, 2021): 1021–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1717840.
Hellqvist, Sara. “Access to Justice for Wrongful Conviction Claimants in Sweden: The Final Legal Safeguard and Levels of (In)Accessibility.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 39, no. 3 (July 3, 2021): 320–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2021.2010909.
Human Rights Watch. “Detained Without Trial: Abuse of Internal Security Act Detainees in Malaysia,” 2005. https://www.hrw.org/report/2005/09/26/detained-without-trial/abuse-internal-security-act-detainees-malaysia.
Ibrahim, Zumiyati Sanu, Suud Sarim Karimullah, Andi Istiqlal Assaad, Rina Septiani, and Huseyin Okur. “Integration of Maqaṣid Al-Shari’ah in the Criminal Law Reform to Achieve Justice and Human Dignity.” Jurnal Hukum Islam 23, no. 1 (2025): 105–44. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v23i1.04.
International Commission of Jurists. “The Turkish Criminal Peace Judgeships and International Law.” Geneva, 2018. https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Turkey-Judgeship-Advocacy-Analysis-brief-2018-ENG.pdf.
Juniarti, Dewi Bella. “Fulfillment of Defendant’s Rights in PERMA Number 4 of 2020 Reviewed from the Principle of Due Process of Law.” Lex Scientia Law Review 5, no. 2 (November 29, 2021): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i2.50385.
Kadish, Sanford H. “Methodology and Criteria in Due Process Adjudication. A Survey and Criticism.” The Yale Law Journal 66, no. 3 (January 1957): 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/793970.
Kadouf, Hunud Abia, Umar A. Oseni, and Magaji Chiroma. “Revisiting the Role of a Muftī in the Criminal Justice System in Africa: A Critical Appraisal of the Apostasy Case of Mariam Yahia Ibrahim.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 23, no. S (2015): 1–18. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika PAPERS/JSSH Vol. 23 (S) Oct. 2015/01 JSSH Vol 23 (S) Oct 2015_pg1-18.pdf.
Karimullah, Suud Sarim. “The Role of Law Enforcement Officials: The Dilemma Between Professionalism and Political Interests.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 13, no. 2 (July 31, 2024): 365–92. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.13.2.2024.365-392.
Khalid, Nasirullah. “Presumption of Innocence in the Islamic Law.” Addaiyan Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences 3, no. 1 (January 14, 2021): 11–16. https://doi.org/10.36099/ajahss.3.1.2.
Krismiyarsi, Krismiyarsi, and Rayno Dwi Adityo. “The Urgency of Community Service Imposed as Punishment on Juvenile Delinquents: A Study of Al-Shatibi’s Maqhasid Al-Syariah Concept.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah 17, no. 1 (April 12, 2025): 132–48. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v17i1.31246.
Kurniawan, Edi, Handesman Handesman, Rahmadi Rahmadi, and Khairun Najib. “Early Marriage, Human Rights, and the Living Fiqh: A Maqasid Al-Shariʻa Review.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 20, no. 1 (May 28, 2020): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v20i1.565.
Kusumastuti, Ely. “Penetapan Tersangka sebagai Obyek Praperadilan.” Yuridika 33, no. 1 (February 8, 2018): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7258.
Leheza, Yevhen, Olena Sinkevych, Zorina Kravtsova, Olena Kudriavtseva, and Ievgeniia Cherniak. “The Human Right to an Environment Safe for Life and Health: Legal Regulation, Contemporary Challenges and Comparative Perspectives.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 23, no. 2 (January 30, 2024): 138–50. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v23i2.12257.
Lin, Wenbo, Michael J. Strube, and Henry L. Roediger. “The Effects of Repeated Lineups and Delay on Eyewitness Identification.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 4, no. 1 (December 13, 2019): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0168-1.
Lindseth, Peter. “Judicial Review in Administrative Governance: A Theoretical Framework for Comparative Analysis.” In Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-307-8_9.
Moeliono, Tristam P., and Widati Wulandari. “Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Acara Pidana: Kritikan terhadap Putusan MK tentang Praperadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 22, no. 4 (October 2015): 594–616. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss4.art4.
Mohamad Ridhuan Mohd Zawawi, Wafaa’ Yusof, Zaini Nasohah, Anwar Fakhri Omar, and Safiyyah Hannah Souit. “Rethinking Hisbah and Sharia Proceduralism: A Comparative Approach to Justice in Contemporary Islamic Law.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (May 30, 2025): 234–68. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10391.
Muda, Iskandar, Bintan R. Saragih, and Ferry Edwar. “Constitutional Authority Based on the Constitutional Court Decision in Indonesia.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 3 (September 26, 2023): 221–42. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no3.2636.
Muliana. “Judicial Corruption dan Analisis Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bantuan Dana Likuiditas Bank Indonesia Berdasarkan Teori Sebab-Sebab Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Kasus Syafruddin Arsyad Temenggung.” Jurist-Diction 7, no. 2 (April 1, 2024): 359–74. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v7i2.56407.
Muttaqin, Labib, Nunik Nurhayati, M. Junaidi, Rochman Hadi Mustofa, and Amaylia Noor Alaysia. “Examining the Constitutional Court’s Positive Legislature Decisions in Indonesia’s Hierarchy of Legal Norms.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 14, no. 2 (December 30, 2024): 248–61. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6410.
Nafees, Seeni Mohamed Mohamed. An Introduction to the Divine Criminal Justice System. Gelioya: Minarah Publications, 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372852954_An_Introduction_To_The_Divine_Criminal_Justice_System.
National Anti-Corruption Academy (NACA). “Judicial Regulatory Framework.” aca.gov.eg, n.d. https://aca.gov.eg/News/1797.aspx?utm.
Nur, Muhammad Tahmid. “Justice in Islamic Criminal Law: Study of the Concept and Meaning of Justice in The Law of Qiṣāṣ.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 55, no. 2 (October 15, 2021): 335–65. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v55i2.1011.
Owoade, Abdullateef Adekunle, and Mohammed Bashir Badr. “Hisbah: A Vibrant Islamic Legal Tool for Sociopolitical Orderliness.” Jamia Law Journal 3 (2003): 29–48.
Oxford Analytica. “Golkar Move Will Aid Indonesia’s Jokowi, But Not Graft.” Emerald Expert Briefings, December 22, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-DB227630.
Ramadhan, Fadjar. “Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 dalam Menguji Pasal 77 Huruf A Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Terkait Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Positive Legislator.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 3 (2016): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v3i3.17860.
Rosyid, M., A.N. Kholiq, F. Bintarawati, M.K. Rofiq, L. Lutfi, and M.N. Irfan. “Revitalization of Uṣūl Al-Fiqh through Iḥtiyāṭī Principles.” In Religion, Education, Science and Technology towards a More Inclusive and Sustainable Future, 44–49, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003322054.
Salim, Ssuna, Syahrul Faizaz Binti Abdullah, and Kamarudin bin Ahmad. “Wilayat Al-Hisba; A Means to Achieve Justice and Maintain High Ethical Standards in Societies.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6, no. 4 (July 1, 2015): 201–6. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p201.
Salma, Salma, Almuh Fajri, Taufik Hidayat, and Edi Safri. “The Other Side of the History of the Formulation of Aceh Jinayat Qanun.” AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 22, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 83–110. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i1.21000.
Samsudin, Ifa Sirrhu, Ramalinggam Rajamanickam, and Rohaida Nordin. “Reviewing the Chain Remand Practices and Freedom of Rights in Malaysia.” International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies 9, no. 1 (2022): 51. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRCS.2022.119442.
Samsudin, Ifa Sirrhu, Ramalinggam Rajamanickam, and Rohaida Nordin. “Specific Legal Provision on Pre-Charge Detention for Further Offences: A Viewpoint of Police Enforcement in Malaysia.” Salus Journal 10, no. 1 (2023): 20–44. https://salusjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Salus_2021_006_R1_Samsudin-numbered.pdf.
Saputra, Cokky Wijaya. “The Pre-Trial Application Granted in the Case of Budi Gunawan.” Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 4, no. 1 (December 16, 2019): 63–69. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v4i1.478.
Situmeang, Sahat Maruli Tua. “Presence of Pretrial in the Perspective of the Pancasila State of Law.” Law Reform 17, no. 2 (September 30, 2021): 183–200. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41746.
Suarda, I Gede Widhiana, Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman, and Zaki Priambudi. “Limiting the Legality of Determining Suspects in Indonesia Pre-Trial System.” Indonesia Law Review 11, no. 2 (2021): 137–53. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v11n2.2.
Suharizal, Suharizal, and Firdaus Arifin. “Due to the Verdict of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 on the Extension of Pretrial Institutional Authority in Indonesia.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 4 (August 22, 2019): 218–24. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i4.986.
Summers, Robert S. “A Formal Theory of the Rule of Law*.” Ratio Juris 6, no. 2 (July 2, 1993): 127–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1993.tb00142.x.
Suparmin, Sudirman, and Ramadani Ramadani. “Reconstruction of Maqâshid Al-Syarî`ah as an Approach to Constitutional Law in Overcoming Crime in Indonesia.” Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 26, no. 1 (July 6, 2022): 41–50. https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v26i1.7033.
Supriyono, Supriyono, M. Arief Amrullah, and I Gede Widhiana Suarda. “Pretrial In Indonesian Criminal Law.” International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences 4, no. 3 (June 29, 2023): 562–65. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i3.664.
Susilo, Erwin, Mohd. Din, Suhaimi Suhaimi, and Teuku Muttaqin Mansur. “Justice Delayed, Justice Denied: A Critical Examination of Repeated Suspect Status in Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 10, no. 3 (2024): 342–57. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i3.6088.
Susilo, Erwin, Dharma Setiawan Negara, and Joel Niyobuhungiro. “Legal Protection for Suspects through the Integration of Judicial Supervision in Pre-Trial Detention in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 10, no. 1 (2025): 179–216. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v10i1.20605.
Syafaq, Hammis, Nur Lailatul Musyafaah, and Sri Warjiyati. “Judicial Commission Role to Handle Contempt of Court in Indonesia from the Perspective of Islamic Legal Thought.” European Journal of Law and Political Science 2, no. 3 (May 24, 2023): 7–13. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.3.90.
Taufik, Iqbal, and Muammar. “Examining the Presumption of Innocence Principle against Suspected/Alleged Perpetrators of Terrorism Crimes.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (August 5, 2024): 143–60. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2024.v8.i2.p143-160.
Varuhas, Jason N.E. “The Principle of Legality.” The Cambridge Law Journal 79, no. 3 (November 7, 2020): 578–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197320000598.
Wulandari, Oktavia, Ali Imron, Briliyan Ernawati, and Nazar Nurdin. “Presumption of Innocence Against Criminal Offenders in the Police: A Critical Study.” Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) 2, no. 1 (April 30, 2020): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2020.2.1.5506.
Yasin, Noer. “The Authority Rationalization Philosophy of the Indonesia Competition Commission: The Due Process of Law and Maqashid Sharia Perspectives.” Jurisdictie 13, no. 1 (July 27, 2022): 63–89. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v13i1.15873.
Yılmaz, Zafer. “Erdoğan’s Presidential Regime and Strategic Legalism: Turkish Democracy in the Twilight Zone.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20, no. 2 (April 2, 2020): 265–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1745418.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Al-Ahkam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
By submitting an article to the journal, the author(s) agree to transfer the published article's copyright to the journal, which will act as the publisher. This means the journal will have the right to publish the article in various forms, including reprints. The journal will maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.
In line with the license, authors and third parties (readers, researchers, and others) are allowed to share and adapt the material. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
