Pemetaan visitor and resident dalam keterlibatan individu dengan lingkungan informasi digital

Lasenta Adriyana*    -  Stikes Bhakti Husada Mulia, Indonesia
Dwi Fitrina Cahyaningtyas  -  Universitas Udayana, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Purpose. The digital ecosystem consists of interactions between customers and partners through various channels, both online and offline, as well as the relationships that exist between digital customers and partners. The ideal interaction between humans, technology, values and activities will be created by ideal ecological information. Thus, system places consumers in an important position connecting customer contacts and contact moments with each other. Including the use of products and virtual visits, such as transactions, emails, educational media, etc. In-depth discussion of individual involvement as information organs (inforgs). Employing the activity-based mapping method, which is intended to determine each person's level of engagement with the digital environment.

Methodology. The method used in this research was a pre-post test on respondents who were at Gadjah Mada University Postgraduate School postgraduate students. Questionnaires were distributed concurrently over the WhatsApp group to conduct the survey. The responses provided by respondents are entered into a Google form.

Results and discussion. This study examines the use of technology and information resources by graduate students at the Graduate School of Gadjah Mada University, also known as "Emergent" education members. There are signs that the way pupils look for knowledge has changed as information and technology have advanced.

Conclusions. The conclusion of this research is that there is a shift in information patterns. Previously, respondents' information patterns were mostly carried out directly by teachers or professors, now they have shifted through scientific websites and become residents through applications on social media.

Keywords: digital ecology; digital ecosystem; information seeking behaviour; visitor and resident

  1. Belleghem, S. Van. (2014). The internet of customer value. Nexxworks.
  2. Cahyaningtyas, D. F., Adriyana, L., & Primasti, S. A. (2020). Pergeseran perilaku pencarian informasi pada kalangan digital natives. In M. R. Hendrawan (Ed.), Menuju Tata Kelola Informasi: Sebuah Antologi Kepustakawanan. ISIPII Press.
  3. Connaway, L., White, D., Lanclos, D., & Le Cornu, A. (2013). Visitors and residents: What motivates engagement with the digital information environment? Information Research, 18.
  4. Erlianti, G. (2020). Pola perilaku pencarian informasi generasi z berperspektif ellisian. AL Maktabah, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.29300/mkt.v5i1.3135
  5. Ivalina, R. (2019). Pola pencarian informasi di internet. Jurnal Teknodik, 14, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v8i14.530
  6. Lehman-Wilzig, S. N. (2021). Virtuality and reality: Two sides of the same coin bt - virtuality and humanity: Virtual practice and its evolution from pre-history to the 21st century (S. N. Lehman-Wilzig (ed.); pp. 243–260). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6526-4_12
  7. Nardi, B. A., & O’Day, V. (2000). Information ecologies using technology with heart. The MIT Press.
  8. Phipps, D., Cummins, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W., & Cardinal, S. (2016). The Co-produced pathway to impact describes knowledge mobilization processes. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 9(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.54656/gokh9495
  9. Pradono, J., Hapsari, D., Supardi, S., & Budiarto, W. (2018). Panduan manajemen penelitian kuantitatif (Trihono (ed.)). Penerbit Balitbangkes.
  10. Prensky, M. (2014). Digital natives, digital immigrants. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays for 21st Century Learning, 9, 67–85. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387765.n6
  11. Riady, Y., Riady, H., Arisanty, M., & Wahyu, M. (2023). Perilaku pencarian informasi mahasiswa magister dan doktor fully online dalam menyelesaikan studi di universitas terbuka. Daluang: Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.21580/daluang.v3i1.2023.13296
  12. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan r&d. Alfabeta.
  13. Susanti, D. A. (2012). Ekologi informasi dalam implementasi perpustakaan digital di indonesia : Antara Harapan dan Kenyataan. Edulib, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/edulib.v2i2.10043
  14. White, D. (2017). V&r mapping. https://daveowhite.com/vandr/vr-mapping/
  15. White, D., & Le Cornu, A. (2017). Using ‘visitors and residents’ to visualise digital practices. first monday, 22. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i8.7802
  16. Zhang, P., & Valley, G. (2019). Toward an interality-oriented philosophy ( IOP ) of the digital. 15(4), 13–22.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Lasenta Adriyana, Dwi Fitrina Cahyaningtyas
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publisher of Daluang: Journal of Library and Information Science

Unit Pelaksana Teknis Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo

Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Kampus III UIN Walisongo, Ngaliyan, Semarang, Indonesia

Website: http://library.walisongo.ac.id

 
View My Stats
apps