Implementation of Probolinggo Local Wisdom-Based Problem-Based Learning Model to Improve the Science Literacy Skills of High School Students

Wadhifah Qiyyamul Lailli Arrafi  -  Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Wasis Wasis  -  Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Maya Ningsetyo  -  Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Mohd Zaidi Bin Amiruddin  -  Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Novita Desysetyowati  -  Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Titin Sunarti*  -  Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/perj.2023.5.1.14285

The characteristics of learning in the 21st century are directed at encouraging students to work together, be communicative, think creatively, think critically, think computationally, and have compassion. This study aims to apply a problem-based learning (PBL) model based on Probolinggo local wisdom to improve students' scientific literacy skills. The type of research used is quasi-experimental and uses a Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The type of research used is quasi-experimental and uses a Nonequivalent Control Group Design. This study used two class samples, namely class XII MIPA 1 as a class that will be given treatment (experimental) while class XII MIPA 3 as a class that is not given treatment (control). The Probolinggo local wisdom-based PBL model becomes the independent variable in this study. The dependent variable in this research is students' scientific literacy skills. The control variables in this study were the teachers or researchers, the number of students taught (sample), and the learning materials for dynamic fluids. This research obtained valid learning tools with a validity level of 89.2%. The level of implementation of learning is 94%. Applying learning to apply Probolinggo local wisdom-based PBL model effectively increases students' scientific literacy abilities. This was obtained from the results of the independent-sample T-test, showing that the significance value is 0.000, which is less than 0.05. An increase was seen from the N-Gain test, obtained 0.60 in the class that was given the treatment, while 0.05 in the class that was not. In the future, learning based on Probollinggo's local wisdom can be developed in dynamic fluid learning and linear material learning.

Keywords: Dynamic Fluids; Local Wisdom; Problem-Based Learning; Scientific Literacy; 21st Century Skills

  1. Adawiyah, R., & Wisudawati, A. W. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Literasi Sains : Menilai Pemahaman Fenomena Ilmiah Mengenai Energi. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum, 5(2), 112–121.
  2. Antara, M., & Yogantari, M. V. (2018). Keragaman Budaya Indonesia Sumber Inspirasi Inovasi Industri Kreatif. Senada, 1, 292–301. https://eprosiding.idbbali.ac.id/index.php/senada/article/view/68.
  3. Arrozaqu, A. J., & Setiawan, B. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Zat Aditif. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 674–681. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.3.674-681.
  4. Bagasta, A. R., Rahmawati, D., M, D. M. F. Y., Wahyuni, I. P., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik di Salah Satu SMA Negeri Kota Sragen. Pedagogia : Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v7i2.1551.
  5. Bashooir, K., & Supahar. (2018). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Asesmen Kinerja Literasi Sains Pelajaran Fisika Berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 219–230.
  6. Fauziah, N., Hakim, A., & Handayani, Y. (2019). Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berorientasi Green Chemistry Pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 14(2), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v14i2.1203.
  7. Garson, B. G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishing.
  8. Hidayat, A. (2013). Pengertian Dan Rumus Uji Saphiro Wilk – Cara Hitung. Statistikian. https://www.statistikian.com/2013/01/saphiro-wilk.html.
  9. Indrawati, M. D. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Literasi Sains Fisika Peserta Didik Pada Bahasan Gelombang Bunyi Di Sma Negeri 1 Gedangan Sidoarjo. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 07(01), 14–20.
  10. Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 70 Tahun 2013 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta.
  11. Kemendikbud. (2017). Konsep Literasi Sains dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta : Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan.
  12. Kemendikbud. (2020). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  13. Mardhiyyah, L. A., Rusilowati, A., & Linuwih, S. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Literasi Sains Tema Energi. Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 147–154.
  14. Nurwulandari, N. N. (2018). N Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Literasi Sains terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Mahasiswa pada Pokok Bahasan Energi. Jurnal Pendidikan : Riset Dan Konseptual, 2(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.28926/riset_konseptual.v2i2.51.
  15. OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 draft frameworks. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  16. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  17. Parra-Frutos, I. (2013). Testing Homogeneity Of Variances With Unequal Sample Sizes. Computational Statistics, 28(3), 1269–1297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0353-x.
  18. Permata, S. A. . (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem-based Learning (PBL) Berbasis Kearifan Lokal terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMPN 3 Singosari Kelas VII pada Kegiatan Menganalisis Pencemaran Lingkungan. Skripsi. Malang : Universitas Negeri Malang.
  19. Qomariyah, W., Henie, M., Al, I., & Suarsini, E. (2019). Implementasi Modul Berbasis Problem Based Learning dengan Metode SQ3R Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains dan Sikap Peduli Lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(3), 374–381.
  20. Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors, and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
  21. Rubini, B., Ardianto, D., Setyaningsih, S., & Sariningrum, A. (2019). Using Socio-scientific Issues in Problem Based Learning to Enhance Science Literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012073.
  22. Rusilowati, A., Astuti, B., & Rahman, N. A. (2019). How to improve students' scientific literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1170(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012028.
  23. Sabrina, F., Rachmadiarti, F., & Sunarti, T. (2021). Analisis Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Sma Pada Materi Fluida Dinamis. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 11(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v11n1.p40-51
  24. Septian, A. (2017). Penerapan Geogebra untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Suryakancana. PRISMA, VI(2), 180–191.
  25. Sharma, D., & Kibria, B. G. (2013). On some test statistics for testing homogeneity of variances: a comparative study. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83(10), 1944–1963.
  26. Utama, M. N., Ramadhani, R., Rohmani, S. N., & Prayitno, B. A. (2019). Profil Keterampilan Literasi Sains Siswa Di Salah Satu Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Negeri Di Surakarta. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 3(2), 57–67.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Physics Education Research Journal
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 
apps