Asesmen Multi Representasi Berbasis Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 pada Materi Gerak Lurus

Ellianawati Ellianawati  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Siti Mufiatunnikmah*  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Natalia Erna Setyaningsih  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Bambang Subali  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
This study aims to determine the quality figures of 21st century-based multi-representation assessments on linear motion material. Type of this research is Research & Development (R&D). Data were analyzed using an assessment validity test by an expert and empirical assessment quality test to obtain quality figures in the form of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discrimination power. The results of the preliminary field testing analysis showed 58.33% items were declared valid and 41.67% items were declared invalid. Test items have very high reliability with a value of 0.877. The proportion of the level of difficulty is not ideal, that is equal to 58.33% of questions categorized as difficult and 41.67% of questions categorized as sufficient. The discrimination power of the questions is 8.34% of the questions in a good category, 22.22% are sufficient, 58.33% are bad, and 11.11% are very bad. The result of main field testing, 69.44% items were declared valid and 30.56% items were declared invalid. Test items have high reliability with a value of 0.879. The proportion of the level of difficulty obtained in the main field testing is also not ideal, which is 56% of the difficult category and 44% of the sufficient category. The discrimination power consist of 32% good, 40% were sufficient, and 28% were poor.

Keywords: Assessment; 21st century skills; multi representation

  1. Alwi. 2015. Kriteria Empirik dalam Menentukan Ukuran Sampel pada Pengujian Hipotesis Statistika dan Analisis Butir. J. Formatif, 2(2), 140–148.
  2. Arifin, Z. 2009. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  3. Brookhart, S. M. 2010. How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD.
  4. Fitriatun, A. and S. 2016. Analisis Validitas, Reliabilitas, dan Butir Soal Latihan Ujian Nasional Ekonomi Akuntansi di MAN Maguwoharjo. J. Kajian Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 5(8), 1–11.
  5. Gunel, M. et al. 2006. Comparing Student Understanding of Quantum Physics When Embedding Multimodal Representations into Two Different Writing Formats: Presentation Formaat Versus Summary Report Format. J. Science Educ., 90(6), 1092–1112.
  6. Hariyanto, I. B. . 2014. Asesmen Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  7. Leksana, K. G. 2017. Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Multi Rrepresentasi pada Konsep Alat-alat Optik untuk Mengidentifikasi Kemampuan Representasi Siswa. Univ. Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.
  8. Misel and E. Suwangsih. 2016. Penerapan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. J. Metodi DIdaktik, 10(2), 27–36.
  9. Munandar, U. 2012. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  10. Osman, K. et al. 2010. Development and Validation of The Malaysian 21st Century Skills Instrument (M-21CSI) for Science Students. Proc. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 599–603.
  11. Purwanti, A. et al. 2017. Penguasaan Konsep Materi Kinematika pada Siswa SMA Kelas X dengan Menggunakan Pembelajaran Multirepresentasi. J. Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(4), 75–578.
  12. Purwanti, A. et al. 2016. Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Representasi Materi Gerak Lurus Siswa SMA Kelas XII,. Proc. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, 1.
  13. Rusilowati, A. 2006. Profil Kesulitan Belajar Fisika Pokok Bahasan Kelistrikan Siswa SMA di Kota Semarang. J. Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 4(2), 100–106.
  14. Sinaga. 2014. The Effectiveness Of Learning To Represent Physics Concept Appoarch: Preparing Pre-Service Physics Teachers To Be Good Teachers. International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences, 2.
  15. Sudijono, A. 2015. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  16. Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: INA: Alfabeta.
  17. Sunyono. 2015. Supporting Students in Learning with Multiple Representation to Improve Student Mental Models on Atomic Structures Concepts. Electronic Journal of Science Education International, 2.
  18. Susianna, N. 2014. Implementasi Keterampilan Abad 21 dalam Kurikulum 2013. Proc. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Sains, Dan Tik.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Physics Education Research Journal
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 
apps