Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan PISA Level 4

Muji Suwarno*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Riska Ayu Ardani  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau dari permasalahan matematika PISA level 4. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif. Subyek penelitian siswa kelas VII-A SMP Integral Ar-Rohmah sebanyak 27 siswa. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah 3 soal masalah matematika pisa level 4. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes tertulis dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data dengan mereduksi data, menyajikan data dan menarik kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kemampuan literasi matematika S1 dapat menguasai kemampuan koneksi, kemampuan reproduksi dan kemampuan refleksi. Sedangkan kemampuan literasi matematika S2 adalah tidak menguasai kemampuan koneksi, kemampuan reproduksi ataupun kemampuan refleksi dikarenakan S2 mengalami kesalahan konsep, test taking errors dan misread-directions errors.

Kata Kunci: PISA, literasi matematika, matematika PISA

  1. Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2018). Literacy Learning: Strategies to Improve Literacy Skills in Mathematics, Science. Reading, and Writing. Jakarta: Earth Literacy.
  2. Aini, R. N. (2014). Analisis pemahaman siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah aljabar pada PISA. MATHEdunesa, 3(2).
  3. Aksu, G., & Koruklu, N. (2015). Matematik Başarısı ile Tutum, Mantıksal Düşünme Yetenekleri ve Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri Arasındaki Doğrudan ve Dolaylı İlişkiler. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 59(59), 181–206.
  4. Altun, M. (2008). İlköğretim ikinci kademe (6, 7 ve 8. sınıflarda) matematik öğretimi (5. Baskı). Bursa: Aktüel Yayıncılık.
  5. Edo, S. I., Hartono, Y., & Putri, R. I. I. (2013). Investigating secondary school students’ difficulties in modeling problems PISA-model level 5 and 6. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 41–58.
  6. Faturrochmah, H., Sary, R. M., & Azizah, M. (2021). KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENGERJAKAN SOAL MATERI BANGUN DATAR BERDASARKAN TEORI NOLTING PADA SISWA KELAS IV SEKOLAH DASAR. Elementary School: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Ke-SD-An, 8(2), 310–321.
  7. Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.
  8. Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41.
  9. Kafifah, A., Sugiarti, T., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2018). Pelevelan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Konten Change and Relationship. Kadikma, 9(3), 75–84.
  10. Katranci, Y., & Şengül, S. (2019). The relationship between mathematical literacy and visual math literacy self-efficacy perceptions of middle school students. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 9(4), 1113–1138.
  11. Noviarsyh Dasaprawira, M., Zulkardi, & Susanti, E. (2019). Developing mathematics questions of Pisa type using Bangka context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 303–314.
  12. OECD. (2003). First Results From PISA 2003: Excecutive Summary. In OECD Publishing.
  13. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. Executive Summary. ERIC Clearinghouse.
  14. OECD. (2009). Learning mathematics for life: A perspective from PISA. OECD Publishing.
  15. OECD. (2010). What Students Know and Can Do. In PISA 2009 at a Glance: Vol. I. OECD.
  16. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to Learn: Students’ Engagement, Drive and Self-Beliefs (Volume III): Preliminary Version. OECD Paris, France.
  17. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015: Results in focus. In OECD Publishing.
  18. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results COMBINED EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES. In PISA 2018 Results COMBINED EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES. OECD Publishing.
  19. Sari, E. F. P. (2015). Pengembangan soal matematika model PISA untuk mengetahui argumentasi siswa di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 124–147.
  20. Sari, Y. M., & Valentino, E. (2017). An analysis of students error in solving PISA 2012 and its Scaffolding. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(2), 90–98.
  21. Ulpa, F., Marifah, S., Maharani, S. A., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kontekstual pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Ditinjau dari Teori Nolting. Square : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 67–80.
  22. Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11, 555–584.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Square : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Square : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Published by Mathematic and Mathematic Education Department of Science and Technology Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Website: http://fst.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: square@walisongo.ac.id

ISSN: 2714-609X (Print)
ISSN: 2714-5506 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

apps