Philosophical Theology as a Catalyst for Inclusive Interreligious Dialogue in Plural Societies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2025.36.1.26004Keywords:
Philosophical Theology, Interreligious Dialogue, Religious Pluralism, Hermeneutical Openness, Dialogical EthicsAbstract
In an era of intensifying religious diversity and sociopolitical polarisation, interreligious dialogue is both a necessity and a moral imperative. However, such dialogue is often constrained by epistemological biases, theological exclusivism, and rigid doctrinal frameworks. This study explores the role of philosophical theology as a transformative medium for inclusive interreligious communication. Drawing on biblical values such as love, justice, and peace, and informed by dialogical approaches from Islamic (ta’aruf) and Jewish (“I-Thou”) traditions, the research proposes a pluralistic theological model grounded in epistemic humility and shared ethics. Utilising a descriptive-analytical method through systematic literature review of 50 scholarly works, the study demonstrates how philosophical reflection can overcome confessional barriers, reframe hermeneutical practices, and support practical initiatives—such as scriptural reasoning and alternative media—for sustainable dialogue. The research contributes theoretically by expanding the framework of dialogical theology, and practically by offering tools for interfaith actors and educators to foster ethical, inclusive, and context-sensitive engagement. This approach affirms that theological plurality, when anchored in philosophical depth, can generate transformative interreligious understanding in plural societies.
Downloads
Author Biography
David Ming, Department of Teological Studies, Sekolah Tinggi Teologia Kadesi,Yogyakarta
References
Abdullah, W. (2023). ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITION: Knowledge and Man’s Path To God. Karimiyah, 3(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.59623/karimiyah.v3i1.29
Abror, R. H. (2020). The History and Contribution of Philosophy in Islamic Thought. Buletin Al-Turas, 26(2), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v26i2.15867
Amal, M. K., & Saat, N. (2022). TOLERANCE WITHOUT LIBERALISM. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 16(02), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2021.16.02.167-189
Asha, C. (2023). Religion, Culture, and Politics: Analyzing the Influence of Religious Beliefs on Sociopolitical Dynamics. International Journal of Culture and Religious Studies, 4(2), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijcrs.1347
AVCI, B. (2018). Comparative Theology: An Alternative to Religious Studies or Theology of Religions? Religions, 9(3), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9030083
Brenet, J. B. (2013). Averroès a-t-il inventé une théorie des deux sujets de la pensée? Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía, 29(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v29i1.212
Campdepadrós-Cullell, R., Pulido-Rodríguez, M. Á., Marauri, J., & Racionero-Plaza, S. (2021). Interreligious Dialogue Groups Enabling Human Agency. Religions, 12(3), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12030189
Castells, M. (2000). Toward a sociology of the network society. Contemporary Sociology, 29(5), 693–699.
Clooney, F. X. (2010). Comparative theology: Deep learning across religious borders. John Wiley & Sons.
Cornell, S. (1996). The variable ties that bind: Content and circumstance in ethnic processes. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 19(2), 265–289.
Esack, F. (1997). Qurʾan, liberation and pluralism: an Islamic perspective of interreligious solidarity against oppression. Oneworld.
Evans, A. H. (2019). THE CONCEPT OF THE IMAGO DEI: COHERENCE WITH EVOLUTIONARY SCIENCE? Scriptura, 118(1). https://doi.org/10.7833/118-1-1547
Faruque, M. U. (2023). Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.868
Fredericks, J. L. (1999). Faith among faiths: Christian theology and non-Christian religions. Paulist Press.
Gao, Q., Woods, O., Kong, L., & Shee, S. Y. (2024). Lived religion in a digital age: technology, affect and the pervasive space-times of ‘new’ religious praxis. Social & Cultural Geography, 25(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2022.2121979
Gilliat-Ray, S. (2005). ‘Sacralising’sacred space in public institutions: A case study of the prayer space at the Millennium Dome. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 20(3), 357–372.
Gyekye, K. (1989). Al-Fārābī on the Logic of the Arguments of the Muslim Philosophical Theologians. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 27(1), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1989.0001
Heschel, A. J. (1955). Symbolism and jewish faith. Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
Hick, J. (1988). God and the Universe of Faiths: Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. Springer.
Hick, J. (2004). An interpretation of religion: Human responses to the transcendent. Yale University Press.
Kasim, M. Y., & Haddade, H. (2022). Understanding Text and Context for Productive Reading: an Analysis of Abu Zaid’s Hermeneutics of the Qur’an. ADDIN, 15(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v15i2.10765
Kearney, A. J. (2015). Understanding applied behavior analysis: An introduction to ABA for parents, teachers, and other professionals. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Knitter, P. F. (2002). Theologies of religions. New York.
Küng, H. (2004). Global responsibility: In search of a new world ethic. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Levinas, E. (1987). Language and proximity. In Collected philosophical papers (pp. 109–126). Springer.
McGrath, R. E. (2015). Character strengths in 75 nations: An update. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 41–52.
Meindl, P. (2021). From the Thou to the We: Rediscovering Martin Buber’s Account of Communal Experiences. Human Studies, 44(3), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09593-4
Moltmann, J. (1993). The church in the power of the Spirit: A contribution to messianic ecclesiology. Fortress Press.
Moltmann, J., & Kohl, M. (2000). Experiences in theology: Ways and forms of Christian theology. Fortress Press.
Muh Aditya Ibrahim, Eri R Hidayat, Halomoan FS Alexandra, Pujo Widodo, & Herlina JR Saragih. (2023). Horizontal Conflict Resolution Related to Belief in Religious Tolerance in Multi-Cultural Society in Indonesia. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 2(6). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.525
Nasr, S. H. (2005). The need for a sacred science. Routledge.
Neusner, J. (2003). Judaism: the Evidence of the Mishnah. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345–359.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
Ramadan, T. (2005). Western Muslims and the Future of Islam. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183566.001.0001
Rampisela, D. A. (2020). Transdisciplinary Research Bridges the Gap between Science and Pastoral Services. Jurnal Jaffray, 18(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v18i1.411
Rizvi Jafree, S. (2022). Transmitting religious values through online religious communities: case study of Pakistani Shia mothers’ home education. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 43(4), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2021.1992744
Sarrió, D. R. (2015). El filósofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo islámico de Averroes. Al-Qanṭara, 36(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.3989/alqantara.2015.002
Singh, D. E. (2018). Hundred Years of Christian-Muslim Relations: In Edinburgh Centenary Series Compendium (pp. 192–204). Fortress Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ddcnn1.26
Soars, D. J. (2019). The Virtues of Comparative Theology. Journal of Hindu-Christian Studies, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.7825/2164-6279.1734
Thahir, M. (2023). RELIGIOUS PLURALITY AND THE URGENCY OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN INDONESIA. Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Ilmu Studi Ushuluddin Dan Filsafat, 19(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v19i1.1905
Tighe, E., Saxe, L., Parmer, D., Nussbaum, D., & de Kramer, R. M. (2023). According to their Numbers: Assessing the Pew Research Center’s Estimate of 7.5 Million Jewish Americans. Contemporary Jewry, 43(2), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-022-09472-9
Tracy, D. (1981). The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism. Author’s Response. Horizons, 8(2), 329–339.
Tracy, D. J., & Reierson, R. L. (2002). Commercial synthesis of monoalkyl phosphates. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 5(2), 169–172.
Tumashbay, T., & Ibrayeva, N. (2023). Social and philosphical views in the works of Al Farabi and Al Gazali. Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Historical Sciences. Philosophy. Religion Series, 142(1), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7255-2023-142-1-225-236
Volf, M. (2019). Exclusion and embrace. A Eological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation. Revised and Updated, Nashville, 142–150.
Wyschogrod, E. (2000). Emmanuel Levinas: The problem of ethical metaphysics (Issue 8). Fordham Univ Press.
Zamzami, M., Gharamaleki, G. K., Hosseinieskandian, A., & A’la, A. (2022). On the Intersection of Science and Religion: A Critical Analysis of Abdulkarim Soroush’s Thought. Religió Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 12(2), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v12i2.2167
Ziderman, A. (2022). Better Use an Arrow: ‘I-Thou,’ ‘Relation,’ and Their Difference in Martin Buber’s I and Thou. Naharaim, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/naharaim-2022-0006
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ester Widiyaningtyas, Areyne Christi, Angelo Nicolaides, David Ming
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.
Note: Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission.
Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_______
Copyright Transfer Aggreement
In order for Jurnal Theologia to publish and distribute research articles, the editors need publishing rights (transferred from author to publisher). This agreement relates to the transfer/publishing copyright license to Jurnal Theologia but the authors still have significant rights to use and share their published articles.
Jurnal Theologia supports the need for writers to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and their rights on any database. As a journal article writer, you have the right to various uses of your articles, including that by the institution or company where you work. Copyright can be used without the need for special permission. Authors who publish articles in the Jurnal Theologia have broad rights to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without requesting permission, including:
- Use by the author for lectures, presentations, or conferences, with distribution of copies to participants;
- Distribution to colleagues for research use;
- Use in compilations of the author's subsequent work;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- Reuse of sections or excerpts from articles in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- Preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- Voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors’ or writers' agencies for scientific purposes
When submitting a manuscript, authors do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Jurnal Theologia.
Authors whose articles are accepted for publication will receive confirmation via email and sent a Copyright Transfer Agreement.
