Counter-Discourse on The Criticism of Ibn Rushd Toward al-Ghazali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2021.32.1.8330Keywords:
God's knowledge, nature’s immortality, and physical resurrection.Abstract
Al-Ghazali's intellectuality and capabilities have been recognized worldwide until he was nicknamed H{ujjatul Isla>m. Therefore, if there are people who refute his thinking in many ways, then the refutation needs to be investigated further. In this case, Ibn Rushd rejected and blamed al-Ghazali's criticism of the peculiarities of the philosophers on three things, namely the nature’s immortality, God's knowledge, and physical resurrection. This study aims to find a clear position regarding the controversial discussion between Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazali. Both had different views on these three issues. This qualitative discussion with a critical hermeneutic approach presents various analyzes of the arguments of the two figures, especially concerning Ibn Rushd's criticism toward al-Ghazali. This study resulted in a conclusion that Ibn Rushd's criticism toward al-Ghazali can be said to still have gaps in his argumentation. When Ibn Rushd presented a proposition in the form of verses of the Qur'an, the verse he delivered supported al-Ghazali's opinion if analyzed in more depth, and was cross-checked with other verses.Downloads
References
Abu-Lughod, Lila, “The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power through Bedouin Women.” Journal American Ethnologist 17, no. 1 (1990)
Al-‘Alawi, Jamaluddin, “Kata Pengantar” dalam Ibnu Rusyd, Al-Dharuri fi Usul fiqh aw Mukhtasar al-Mustashfa, Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islamiy, 1994.
Baharnejad, Zakrya & Sanobari, Narges, “A Study on Seyyed Jalaluddin Ashtiani`s Critics on Ghazali's Objections Regarding Knowledge of Particulars by God”, Journal Ontological Researches 8, no. 15 (2019)
Bakker, Anton, Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1989.
Bilalov, Mustafa, “Ontological and Epistemological Discordsroots in Islam.” Journal The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS), (2019): 430-436. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.59.
Bleicher, Josef, Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique, London: Routledge 6 Kegan Paul, 1980.
Daudy, Ahmad, Kuliah Filsafat Islam, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1986.
Fakhry, Majid, A History of Islamic Philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.
Fauziah, Ruhyatul, “Kebangkitan Manusia di Akhirat menurut al-Ghazali dan Ibnu Rusyd”, Jurnal Aqlania 9, no. 2 (2018): 193-221. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.32678/aqlania.v9i02.2066.
Fawait, Agus, “Rancang Bangun Pemikiran Ibn Rusyd dalam Pembelaan atas Fil-safat”, Jurnal Islamic Akademika 6, no. 1 (2019): 23-31. https://doi.org/ 10.230303/staiattaqwa.v6i1.73.
Al-Ghazali, Tahafut al-Falasifah, Lebanon: Dar al-Fikr al-Lubnani, 1993.
Hamkah, Zainuddin, “Ibnu Rusyd: Pembelaan Terhadap Para Filosof”, Jurnal Ash-Shahabah 4, no. 1 (2018)
Hidayat, Nurul, “Bantahan Ibnu Rusyd terhadap Kritik al-Ghazâlî Tentang Keqa-diman Alam.” Jurnal Ulumuna 11, no. 2 (2007): 373-388. https://doi.org/ 10.20414/ujis.v11i2.407.
Hussein, Athal Ibrahim, “Philosophical Controversies between Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 11, no. 9 (2020)
Al-Iraqi, M. ‘Athif, Al-Manhaj an-Naqdi fi Falsafah Ibn Rushd, (Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1980.
Janssens, Jules,“Al-Ghazali’s Tahafut: Is It Really a Rejection of Ibn Sina’s Philosophy?.” Journal of Islamic Studies 12, no. 1, (2001)
Al-Khadiri, Zaynab Mahmud, Atsar Ibnu Rusyd fi Falsafah al-Ashr al-Wustha, (Beirut: Dar al-Tanwir, 2007.
Kirabaev, N.S. & Al-Janabi, M., “Prolegomena to metaphysics of al-Ghazali”, RUDN Journal of Philosophy Вестник РУДН, серия Философия, no. 4 (2016)
Mahmud, Akilah, “Jejak Pemikiran Al-Ghazali dan Ibnu Rusyd dalam Perkembangan Teologi Islam.” Jurnal Sulesana 13, no. 2 (2019): 183-198.
Muliati, “Al-Ghazali dan Kritiknya terhadap Filosof”, Jurnal Aqidah-Ta 2, no. 2, (2016): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.24252/aqidahta.v2i2.3436.
Musa, Muhammad Yusuf, Baina al-Din wa al-Falsafah fi Ra’yi Ibni Rushd wa Falasifah al-‘Asr al-Wasith, Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, t.t.
Al-Nabhani, Taqiyuddin, Al-Shakhsiyyah al-Islamiyyah, Beirut: Dar al-Ummah, 2003.
Nasution, Harun, Filsafat & Mistisisme dalam Islam, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1990.
Qardhawi, Yusuf, Berinteraksi dengan al-Qur'an, terj. Abd al-Hayyi, Jakarta: Gema In-sani Press, 2000.
Al-Razi Fakhruddin, Muhammad, Tafsir al-Fakhr al-Razi,, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1981.
Renan, Ernest, Ibn Rushd wa al-Rushdiyyah, terj. Adel Zuaitir, (Kairo: Maktabah ath-Thaqafah al-Diniyyah, 2008.
Rushd, Ibnu, Fasl al-Maqal fi Taqrir Ma Baina al-Hikmah wa al-Syari’ah min al-Ittisal, Beirut: Markaz al-Dirasat al-‘Arabiyyah, 1997.
Rushd, Ibnu, Tahafut al-Tahafut, ed. Sulaiman Dunya, Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1974.
Sina, Ibn, Al-Najat fi al-Hikmah al-Manthiqiyyah wa al-Thabi’iyyah wa al-Ilahiyyah, Ed. Majid Fakhri, Beirut: Dar al-Afaq al-Jadidah, 1982.
Sonhaji, Ahmad, Al-Ajurumiyyah, (Beirut: Dar al-Hifdi Salafiyyah, 2006.
Al-Taftazani, Abu al-Wafa al-Ghanimi, Sufi dari Zaman ke Zaman: Suatu Pengantar tentang Tasawuf, terj. Ahmad Rofi’, Bandung: Pustaka, 2003.
Tedy, Armin, “Kritik Ibnu Rusyd terhadap Tiga Kerancuan Berfikir al-Ghazali.” Jurnal El-Afkar 5, no. 1 (2016): 11-20. https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/ in-dex.php/elafkar/article/view/1117.
Terdiman, Richard, Discourse/Counter-discourse: The Theory of Symbolic Resistance in Nineteenth-Century France, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.
Al-Thabathaba’I, Muhammad Husain, Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an, Beirut: Muassasah al-A’lami: 1997
Tim Penyusun, Ensiklopedi Islam, Jakarta: PT Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, 2002.
Wohlman, Avital, “Al-Ghazali, Averroës and the Interpretation of the Qur’an: Common Sense and Philosophy in Islam”, Journal of Qur'anic Studies 15, no. 1 (2013): 142-146. DOI: 10.3366/jqs.2013.0081.
Yasin, Nawal Taha, “Ibn Rusyd Criticism to al-Ghazali Criticism As a Sample”, Journal Adab al-Basrah 68, (2014)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.
Note: Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission.
Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_______
Copyright Transfer Aggreement
In order for Jurnal Theologia to publish and distribute research articles, the editors need publishing rights (transferred from author to publisher). This agreement relates to the transfer/publishing copyright license to Jurnal Theologia but the authors still have significant rights to use and share their published articles.
Jurnal Theologia supports the need for writers to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and their rights on any database. As a journal article writer, you have the right to various uses of your articles, including that by the institution or company where you work. Copyright can be used without the need for special permission. Authors who publish articles in the Jurnal Theologia have broad rights to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without requesting permission, including:
- Use by the author for lectures, presentations, or conferences, with distribution of copies to participants;
- Distribution to colleagues for research use;
- Use in compilations of the author's subsequent work;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- Reuse of sections or excerpts from articles in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- Preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
- Voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors’ or writers' agencies for scientific purposes
When submitting a manuscript, authors do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Jurnal Theologia.
Authors whose articles are accepted for publication will receive confirmation via email and sent a Copyright Transfer Agreement.
