Family Suicide Bombing: A Psychological Analysis of Contemporary Terrorism

Rindha Widyaningsih*  -  Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
K Kuntarto  -  Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Terrorist organizations are now transforming into small cells and spreading their ideology to various parts of the world. The acts of terrorism in the Surabaya bomb case provide a new paradigm of the involvement of family members or an inner circle in their actions. The involvement of family members is considerably related to some psychological aspects. This study aims to provide a psychological analysis of suicide bombing terrors involving family members. The data obtained were analyzed using the perspective of Moghaddam’s theory, ‘staircases to terrorism’. The result indicates that the suicide bomber who has brought their family members in the action has gone through these six stages of psychological aspects: (1) Search for meaning. Actors seeking self and social meaning and finding reasons from the radical ideology adopted; (2) Presenting the ideology. The idea arises to fight those who are considered to do injustice, and the desire to change the system of government and politics is legitimate; (3) Cultivation stage. The process of ideology processing justification for resistance to those who are considered to be doing injustices; (4) Control over members. The stages of correct or wrong assessment based on the fatwa of the leader; (5) Moral engagement. The stage of identity confirmation and the process of polarization of groups of friends and opponents; (6) Recruitment, which is the stage of active involvement in acts of terrorism ranging from planning, targeting, techniques used, time and location of targets to implementing recruitment.

Keywords : psychology of terrorism; radicalism; staircases to terrorism; suicide bombing; terrorism

  1. Crenshaw, M. 2001. “Why America? The Globalization of Civil War.” Current History December.
  2. Damanik, Margith Juita. 2018. “5 Kasus Teror Di Indonesia Selama Mei 2018.” IDN Times. https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/margith-juita-damanik/5-kasus-teror-di-indonesia-selama-mei.
  3. Fealy, Greg. 2007. “Militant Java-Based Islamic Movement.” In A Handbook Of Terrorism And Insurgency In Southeast Asia, edited by Andrew Tan, 2:63–57. Cheltenham, UK- Northamton USA: Edward Elgar. doi:10.1016/B978-0-340-71920-6.50033-9.
  4. Gazi, and Ikhwan Lutfi. 2011. “Dari Orang Biasa Menjadi Teroris.” Jakarta.
  5. Golose, Petrus Reinhard. 2010. Deradikalisasi Terorisme Humanis, Soul Approach Dan Menyentuh Akar Rumput. Jakarta: YPKIK.
  6. Hafidz, Tatik. 2003. “Assesing Indonesia’s Vulnerability in The Wake of The American-Led Attack on Iraq.” In After Bali The Threat of Terrorism in Souteast Asia, edited by Ramakrishna Kumar and Tan See Seng. Singapore: World Scientific and Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/5438.
  7. Hamid, Sadika Nuraini. 2017. “Kaleidoskop 2017: Kasus Terorisme Di Indonesia Selama Setahun.” Tempo, December.
  8. Jones, Sidney. 2018. “Family Suicide Attacks: Indonesia Must Deradicalize Mothers And Kids Too.” NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/05/24/613383263/family-suicide-attacks-indonesia-must-deradicalize-mothers-and-kids-too.
  9. Moghaddam, Fathali M. 2005. “The Staircase to Terrorism a Psychological Exploration.” American Psychologist 60 (2): 161–69. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.161.
  10. Mubarak, Zulfi. 2012. “Fenomena Terorisme Di Indonesia: Kajian Aspek Teologi, Ideologi Dan Gerakan.” Jurnal Studi Masyarakat Islam 15 (2): 240–54.
  11. Mustofa, Imam. 2012. “Terorisme: Antara Aksi Dan Reaksi.” Religia 15 (1): 65–87.
  12. Nugroho, Fachri Sakti. 2018. “33 Terduga Teroris Di Seluruh Wilayah Indonesia Telah Diamankan Oleh Densus 88 Selama Sepekan.” Tribun News. http://wow.tribunnews.com/2018/05/16/33-terduga-teroris-di-seluruh-wilayah-indonesia-telah-diamankan-oleh-densus-88-selama-sepekan.
  13. Pusponegoro, Aryono D. 2017. “Terrorism in Indonesia.” Prehospital And Disaster Medicine 18 (2): 100–105.
  14. Qodir, Zuly. 2014. Radikalisme Agama Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  15. Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. 2016. Psikologi Agama. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  16. Singh, Bilveer. 2004. “The Challenge of Militant Islam and Terrorism in Indonesia.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 58 (March 2004): 47–68. doi:10.1080/1035771032000184764.
  17. Subhan, Muhammad. 2016. “Pergeseran Orientasi Gerakan Terorisme Islam Di Indonesia (Studi Terorisme Tahun 2000-2015).” Journal of International Relations 2 (4): 59–67.
  18. Sukma, Rizal. 2003. “Indonesia and The Challenge of Radical Islam After October 12.” In After Bali in Threat of Terrorism in Southeast Asia, edited by Ramakrishna Kumar and Tan See Seng, 350–83. Singapore: World Scientigic and Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies. doi:10.1142/9789812561749_0016.
  19. Widyaningsih, Rindha, Sumiyem, and Kuntarto. 2017. “The Potential of Religious Radicalism Movement in Banyumas.” Walisongo 25 (1): 203–30. doi:10.21580/ws.25.1.1807.
  20. Zakiyah. 2016. “The Chronicle Of Terrorism And Islamic Militancy In Indonesia.” Analisa 1 (1): 19–40.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan
ISSN 0852-7172 (p) 2461-064X (e)

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M)
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Rectorate Building, 3rd Floor
Jl. Prof. Hamka - Kampus 3, Tambakaji Ngaliyan 50185, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Email: walisongo@walisongo.ac.id


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats

apps