MUSLIM AWAM DAN FATĀWĀ AL-NAWĀZIL: ANTARA MAṢLAḤAH DAN MASALAH

Arifana Nur Kholiq*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Maskur Rosyid  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/jish.v7i1.11808
Legal certainty is needed so that order can be realized. One of the efforts that can be done is positive integration between the government and the ulama in determining the competence of a muftī. This article provides discourse and solutions regarding the criteria for a muftī in providing legal answers in extraordinary cases (nawāzil). Ordinary Muslims in this matter become an important concern, because they need legal certainty from experts. Wrong in seeking legal solutions, of course, has an impact on legal misguidance. More than that, the phenomenon of the emergence of an impromptu muftī, of course, can cause legal chaos. Through a literature study, this paper concludes that the presence of a credible muftī and fatwā institution is a must for a country, so that legal products that realize the benefit of the people can be realized.

Keywords: Legal Product; Maṣlaḥah; Fatwā, Lay Muslim, Nawāzil

  1. ‘Allām, Shawqī Ibrāhīm ’Abd al-Karīm. Fatāwā al-Nawāzil: Wabā’u Kūrūnā Covid-19. Kairo: Dār al-Iftā’ al-Miṣrīyah, 2020.
  2. Al-Barzanjī, Sayyid Ja’far. Lujayn al-Dānī fī Manāqib al-Shaykh ‘Abd al-Qādir al-Jīlānī. Kediri: Maktabah Pondok Pesantren Tahfidh wal Qiraat Lirboyo, n.d.
  3. Al-Fadanī, Syaikh Muḥammad Yāsīn bin ‘Īsā. Al-Fawā’id al-Janiyah Ḥāshiyah Mawāhib al-Saniyah Sharḥ Farā’id al-Bahiyyah. Beirut: Dār al-Bashā’ir al-Islāmiyah, 1996.
  4. Al-Fasī, Muḥammad. Al-Itqān wa al-Iḥkām Sharḥ Tuḥfah al-Aḥkām fī Nukah al-‘Uqūd waal-Aḥkām li Abī Bakr Muḥammad ‘Āṣim al-Andalusī. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 2011.
  5. Al-Fayūmī, Aḥmad. Al-Miṣbah al-Munīr. Beirut: Maktabah ’Ilmiyyah, n.d.
  6. Al-Ḥajj, Ibn Amīr. Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Taḥbīr. 3 ed. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1997.
  7. Al-Haytamī, Aḥmad Ibn Ḥajar. Al-Fatāwā al-Kubrā al-Fiqhiyyah ‘alā Madhha al-Imām al-Shāfi’ī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2008.
  8. Al-Jaṣṣāṣ. Al-Fuṣūl fī al-Uṣūl. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 2000.
  9. Al-Jayzanī, Muḥammad. Fiqh al-Nawāzil: Dirāsah Ta’ṣīliyah wa Taṭbīqiyah. Riyad: Dār Ibn Jawzī, 2006.
  10. Al-Khaṭṭāb, Abū ‘Abdillāh. Mawāhib al-Jalīl fī Sharḥ Mukhtaṣār al-Shaykh Khalīl. Mauritania-Nouakchott: Dār al-Riḍwān, n.d.
  11. Al-Nawawī, Muḥy al-Dīn ibn Sharf. Al-Minhāj Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. Kairo: al-Maṭba‘ah al-Misriyah, 1929.
  12. ———. Rawḍah al-Ṭālibīn wa ‘Umdah al-Muftīn. Beirut: Al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1991.
  13. Al-Qarḍāwī, Yūsuf. Al-Ijtihād fī al-Sharī’ah al-Islāmiyyah ma’a Naẓarāt Taḥlīliyyah fī al-Ijtihād al-Mu’āṣir. Kuwait: Dār al-Qalam, 1997.
  14. Al-Qurṭubī, Ibn Baṭṭāl. Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Riyad: Maktabah Rushd, 2008.
  15. Al-Shāfi’ī, Muḥammad Ibn Idrīs. Al-Umm. 1 ed. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2009.
  16. al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Taqrīr Istinād fī Tafsīr al-Ijtihād. Mesir: Dār al-Da’wah, 1983.
  17. Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn Ibn ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Ibn Abī Bakr. Al-Ashbah wa al-Naẓā’ir fī al-Furū’. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1995.
  18. Al-Zarkashī, Muḥammad ibn ‘Abdullāh. Al-Baḥr al-Muḥiṭ fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Kairo: Dār al-Ṣafwah, 1992.
  19. Al-Zuhaylī, Wahbah. Al-Wasīṭ fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Damaskus: Dār al-Kutub, 1978.
  20. ———. Subul al-Istifādah min al-Nawāzil wa al-Fatwā wa al-‘Amal al-Fiqhī fī al-Taṭbīqāt al-Mu’āṣirah. Damaskus: Dār al-Maktabī, 2001.
  21. Amīn, ‘Abd al-Ra’ūf Muḥammad. Al-Ittihād Ta’aththuruh wa Ta’thīruh fī Fiqhī al-Maqāṣid wa al-Wāqi’. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2013.
  22. Ashqar, Sulaymān. Al-Futyā wa Manāhij al-Iftā’. Kuwait: Maktabah Manar al-Islāmī, 1976.
  23. Bisri, KH. A. Mustofa. “Fatwa dan Fatwa.” NU Online, 15 Oktober 2016. https://www.nu.or.id/opini/fatwa-dan-fatwa-2Mk5z.
  24. Christin, Maylanny, Dasrun Hidayat, dan Atie Rachmiatie. “Construction of Social Reality for Physical Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Jurnal Komunikasi 13, no. 1 (7 Maret 2021): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24912/JK.V13I1.9612.
  25. Dahlan, Moh., Zakiyuddin Baidlawy, dan Sugiono Sugiono. “Gus Dur’s Ijtihād Paradigm of Contemporary Fiqh in Indonesia.” Al-Ahkam 29, no. 2 (7 November 2019): 167. https://doi.org/10.21580/AHKAM.2019.29.2.4193.
  26. Dār al-Iftā’ al-Miṣriyah. Al-Fatāwā al-Islāmiyah min Fatāwā Dār al-Iftā’ al-Maṣriyah. Mesir: Majlis al-A’lā li al-Shu’ūn al-Islāmiyah, 1993.
  27. Effendi, Satria. Ushul Fiqh. Diedit oleh M. Nurul Irfan Aminuddin Ya’kub. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.
  28. Hamdan, Ibn. Ṣifat al-Muftī wa al-Mustaftī. Damaskus: Manshūrah al-Maktabah al-Islāmī, n.d.
  29. Handayani, Sri Ana. “Humaniora dan Era Disrupsi Teknologi dalam Konteks Historis.” In Humaniora dan Era Disrupsi, 19–30. Jember: Jember University Press, 2020. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/19966/8719.
  30. Hummām, Ibn. Fat al-Qadir: Sharḥ Kitāb al-Hidāyah fī Sharḥ al-Bidāyah. Mesir: Dār al-Nawādir, 1900.
  31. Kementerian Wakaf dan Keagamaan Kuwait. Al-Mawsū’ah al-Fiqhiyyah. Kuwait: Kementerian Wakaf dan Keagamaan Kuwait, 1983.
  32. Ma’lūf, Louis. Al-Munjid fī al-Lughah. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1987.
  33. Mahfudh, KH. MA. Sahal. Nuansa Fiqih Sosial. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2007.
  34. Manẓūr, Ibn. Lisān al-’Arab. Beirut: Dâr al-Ṣādir, n.d.
  35. Nujaym, Zayn al-Dīn Ibn Ibrāhīm Ibn. Bahr al-Rā’iq Sharḥ Kanz al-Daqā’iq. Beirūt: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1997.
  36. Rosyid, Maskur. Implementasi Konsep Maslahat al-Ṭūfī dalam Fatwa MUI (2005-2010). 1 ed. Magelang: Ngudi Ilmu, 2013.
  37. Rosyid, Maskur, dan M. Nurul Irfan. “Reading Fatwas of MUI a Perspective of Maslahah Concept.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 19, no. 1 (2 Juni 2019): 91–117.
  38. Rustandi, L. Rudy. “Disrupsi Nilai Keagamaan dalam Dakwah Virtual di Media Sosial Sebagai Komodifikasi Agama di Era Digital.” Sangkep: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Keagamaan 3, no. 1 (2020): 23–34. https://journal.uinmataram.ac.id/index.php/sangkep/article/view/1036/989.
  39. Shalṭūṭ, Maḥmūd. Al-Fatāwā. Kairo: Dār al-Yusr, 1996.
  40. Tajrid, Amir. “Tracing the Genealogy of Maqāṣid al- Sharī’ah Concept : A Historical Approach.” al-Ahkam 31, no. 1 (2021): 69–90. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2021.31.1.6696.
  41. “The craft of Issuing Fatwas,” n.d. https://www.dar-alifta.org/Foreign/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=77&CategoryID=3.
  42. Toweren, Karimi. “Peran Tokoh Agama dalam Peningkatan Pemahaman Agama Masyarakat Kampung Toweren Aceh Tengah.” Dayah: Journal of Islamic Education 1, no. 2 (10 Juli 2018): 258–72. https://doi.org/10.22373/JIE.V1I2.2967.
  43. Winata, Muhammad Reza, dan Oly Viana Agustine. “Rekoneksi Hukum dan Disrupsi Teknologi Melalui Tafsir Konstitusional Mendukung Pembangunan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 4 (Desember 2019): 458–76. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/529/pdf.
  44. Yaḥyā, Aḥmad Ibn. Nawāzil al-Jāmi’. Mesir: Dār al-‘Ᾱfaq, 2011.
  45. Yaqin, Ainol. “Yūsuf Al-Qarḍāwī’s Istinbāṭ Method and Its Implementation in the Moderation of Islamic Law.” Al-Ahkam 31, no. 1 (29 April 2021): 109–40. https://doi.org/10.21580/AHKAM.2021.31.1.7075.
  46. Zakariyyā, Abū Ḥusayn Aḥmad Ibn Fāris Ibn. Mu’jam Maqāyis fī al-Lughah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.

Indexed by

Journal Terindex di Crossref Journal Terindex di Google Scholar Journal Terindex di Academia    

Copyright © 2017 Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, ISSN: 2527-8401 (p) 2527-838X (e)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats
apps