collections_bookmark Focus and Scope

Focus - Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA is a scientific journal that focuses on science and mathematics education. It publishes articles based on empirical studies using quantitative or qualitative approaches or a combination of the two.

Scope - Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA calls for scientific articles on science and mathematics education. It covers issues at varying levels of analysis and methods. Furthermore, it provides the opportunity for the publication of articles based on inter/multidisciplinary and trans-disciplinary research, and even prioritizes or reserves special space for these.

create_new_folder Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

device_hub Peer Review Process

Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA implements the peer review process. All articles submitted will be reviewed in a closed double-blind review by a minimum of two reviewers. Their responses will help the editor (or editorial board) to determine whether an article can be published (accepted), published after revision, or rejected. Returned articles must be improved by the authors. After improvements have been made in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers, author should resend (re-submit) the article for further review. To avoid plagiarism, all articles submitted to Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA will be checked with similarity checker software. The final decision on manuscripts is made by the Editor in Chief.

event_note Publication Frequency

Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA is published twice a year (July and October).

copyright Open Access Policy

Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that makes research freely available to the public, thus supporting a greater global exchange of knowledge

unarchive Archiving

Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA utilizes the Public Knowledge Project Private LOCKSS Network (PKP-PLN) to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries, which are permitted to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. Read More

bookmark_border Publication Ethics Phenomenon

This is an ethics statement for Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA published by the Faculty of Science and Technology. This statement is adapted from the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and includes a code of ethics for the editor in chief, editorial board members, reviewers, and writers. This statement is based on:

Email address: Phenomenon@walisongo.ac.id

Articles published in Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA is a building block (series of writings) that is very important in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge about MIPA education (Mathematics Education, Physics Education, Biology Education, Chemical Education) and that is a direct reflection the quality of writers and institutions. It is therefore important to agree on the expected standard of ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: writers, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public. Editor of Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA is committed to ensuring that all procedures are directed solely to facilitate objective and intellectual treatment. Furthermore, the editors and reviewers evaluate the manuscript regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or certain political and group interests. The software is used to avoid plagiarism among articles.

Tasks of Authors

1. Having the responsibility to ensure only new and original works are submitted. (does not contain plagiarism)
2. It is not permissible to reproduce works that have previously been published in other journals.
3. It may not send any articles that are being reviewed or considered by journals to other journals simultaneously.
4. Only allowed to publish their work elsewhere after receiving an official refusal from the journal or if their request to withdraw their work is officially accepted by the journal.
5. Must notify Editor-in-Chief or publisher of inaccurate data in their published work so that correction or revocation of articles can be made.
6. Must make a significant contribution and be responsible for any shortcomings in their work.

Tasks of Reviewers

1. Disclose the suitability of the area of interest before agreeing to review submission.
2. Can refuse to review any submission due to a conflict of interest or inadequate knowledge.
3. Review all submission objectively, fairly, and professionally.
4. Expressing ethical errors encountered when reviewing the Editor in Chief for further action.
5. Ensure the authenticity of the submission and be aware of all plagiarism and excessive publication.
6. May not discuss submission content without permission.
7. Comply with the time allocated for the review process. Request for extension to review submissions is at the discretion of the Editor in Chief.

Tasks of Editorial Board Members

1. Actively contribute to the development and goodness of the journal.
2. Acting as a journal ambassador.
3. Continue to support and promote the journal.
4. Review the work assigned to them.

Tasks of Editor in Chief

1. Evaluate the text fairly and solely based on their intellectual abilities.
2. Ensure the confidentiality of the manuscript and not disclose information about the manuscript to anyone other than the person involved in the publishing process.
3. Have the responsibility to decide when and which articles will be published.
4. Actively seek views of board members, reviewers, and authors on how to improve/ enhance the journal's image and visibility.
5. Give clear instructions to potential contributors to the delivery process and what is expected of the author.
6. Make sure the right reviewers are selected.

bookmark_border Allegation of Research Misconducts

Research misconduct refers to fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and in writing it up, or in the reporting of research results. When authors are found to have been involved in research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, the editors have the responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific records.

In cases of suspected misconduct, the editors and editorial board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them in resolving any complaint and addressing the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to involve such misconduct, a retraction will be published and linked to the original article.

The first step in such a process involves determining the validity of the allegation and assessing whether it is consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This also involves determining whether the individuals alleging misconduct have relevant conflicts of interest.

If scientific misconduct or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations will be shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all of the co-authors, will be requested to provide a detailed response. After the response is received and evaluated, additional reviews and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be needed. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article, are sufficient.

Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of scientific records. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on evaluation of such concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, or retractions, Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA will continue to fulfill its responsibilities of ensuring the validity and integrity of the scientific record.

The explanation of Allegation of Research Misconducts follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/misconduct

Retraction

Papers published in Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA will be considered for retraction if:

1. there is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g., data fabrication) or honest error (e.g., miscalculation or experimental error)
2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission, or justification (i.e., cases of redundant publication)
3. they constitute plagiarism
4. they involve unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.

bookmark_border Ethical Clearance

Every article submitted to the Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA must meet the ethical clearance requirements, including:

1. Ethical approval for all research
2. Protection of participants
3. Informed consent
4. No coercion
5. The right to withdraw.
6. Anonymity and confidentiality
7. Appropriate exclusion criteria
8. Additional safeguards for research with vulnerable populations
9. Ethical treatment of non-human animals.
10. Appropriate supervision.

bookmark_border Revenue Sources, Advertising, and Direct Marketing Policy

Revenue Sources

The operations of Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA are funded by the State (the Ministry of Religious Affairs Republic of Indonesia), through Daftar Isian Pelaksanaan Anggaran (DIPA) of Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia.

Advertising

Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA does not accept advertising from any parties.

Direct Marketing

In promoting the journal and publications to the public, Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA attempts to avoid actions detrimental to other parties (e.g., spreading spam) and to avoid misleading information between prospective authors and the publishers.

bookmark_border Author Fees

Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA does not charge any submission or publication fees, and no fees are incurred for article processing or for the review process.