Muslim community communication through cross-religious social interaction in the Mardika market Ambon, Moluccas

Nur Sakinah    -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon, Indonesia
Darma Darma    -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon, Indonesia
Sulaeman Sulaeman*    -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon, Indonesia
Andi Fitriyani    -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon, Indonesia
Nurida Kella  -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon, Indonesia
Baiti Ren'el  -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ambon, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

 

 

Purpose – This article aims to map research by elaborating on cross-religious relationships and social interaction communication for the Muslim community in Mardika Market, Ambon City, Maluku.

Method – Blumer's theoretical exploration is used with a constructivist paradigm and phenomenological communication method as fundamental references. This review is developed based on input from mardika market management coordinator and identifies current field research obtained qualitatively through several informal conversational interviews and observations of various gaps in social interactions.

Results – The article highlights the complexity of cross-religious social interactions impacting intrapersonal, interpersonal, and group communication for the Muslim community in Mardika Market. It begins with understanding cross-religious social interaction relationships and communication events, then finds patterns of communication relationships within the Muslim community.

Implications – This article contributes to realize cross-religious harmonization by discussing the search for the meaning of social interactions with the hope of living together peacefully. Strengthening social interactions is very important as it tends to reduce the incidence of cross-religious conflicts. This contribution offers opportunities for social interaction accommodation and ways to avoid cross-religious tensions.

Originality/Value – Many published articles focus on cross-religious relationships by detailing the tensions and benefits of cross-religious social interactions, but they are still lacking. However, this study presents the phenomenological communication method and constructivist paradigm to observe the development of communication within the Muslim community engaging in cross-religious social interactions in Mardika Market, Ambon City, Moluccas.

***

Tujuan – Artikel ini adalah untuk memetakan penelitian dengan mengelaborasi hubungan lintas agama, dan komunikasi interaksi sosial lintas agama bagi komunitas Muslim di pasar Mardika Kota Ambon, Maluku.

Metode – Dengan menggunakan penelusuran teoretis dari Blumer dengan paradigma konstruktivis dan metode fenomenologi komunikasi sebagai acuan mendasar. Tinjauan ini dikembangkan berdasarkan masukan dari koordinator pengelola pasar mardika, dan mengidentifikasi kekinian penelitian di lapangan yang diperoleh secara kualitatif melalui beberapa wawacara percakapan informal, dan pengamatan dari berbagai kesenjangan dalam interaksi sosial.

Hasil – Artikel menyoroti betapa kompleksnya interaksi sosial lintas agama berdampak pada komunikasi intrapribadi, antarpribadi, dan kelompok bagi komunitas Muslim di pasar mardika. Diawali dengan pemahaman hubungan interaksi sosial lintas agama, dan peristiwa komunikasi, kemudian menemukan pola hubungan komunikasi komunitas Muslim. 

Implikasi – Kontribusi artikel ini untuk mewujudkan harmonisasi lintas agama melalui pembahasan pencarian makna interaksi sosial dengan harapan dapat hidup bersama secara damai. Penguatan interaksi sosial sangat penting karena cenderung menurunkan insiden konflik lintas agama. Kontribusi ini menawarkan peluang akomodasi interaksi sosial dan cara untuk menghindari ketegangan lintas agama.

Orisinalitas/Nilai – Banyak artikel terpublikasi hingga saat ini terfokus pada hubungan lintas agama dengan menguraikan ketegangan dan manfaat interaksi sosial lintas agama masih kurang. Namun kajian ini menyajikan metode fenomenologi komunikasi dan paradigma konstruktivis untuk mengamati pengembangan komunikasi komunitas Muslim melakukan tindakan interaksi sosial lintas agama di pasar Mardika Kota Ambon, Maluku.

Keywords: Peristiwa komunikasi; Pola komunikasi; Interaksi Sosial; Lintas Agama; Perspektif fenomenlogi; Peristiwa komunikasi; pola komunikasi; interaksi sosial; lintas agama; perspektif fenomenologi

  1. Bamat, T., Nell, B., Myla, L., & Atalia, O. (2017). Interreligious action for peace: Studies in Muslim-Christian cooperation. West Lexington Street: Catholic Relief Services.
  2. Bigger, S., (2009). Victor Turner, liminality, and cultural performance. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 30(2), 209–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361767090317523
  3. Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Cappella, J. (1987). Interpersonal communication: Definitions and fundamental questions. In C. Berger & S. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 184–238). NewburyPark, CA: Sage.
  5. Charon, JM. (1989). Symbolic Interaction: An Introduction, An Interpretation, An Integration. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  6. Chou, C.Y & Soe-Tsyr Y. (2015). Service-driven social community and its relation to well-being, The Service Industries Journal, 35:7-8, 368-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2015.1015520
  7. Coward, H. (1989). Pluralism challenge to world religion. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
  8. Dolgin, JLDS., & Kemnitzer, DMS. (1977). Symbolic Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.
  9. Eck, D. L. (2007). Prospects for pluralism: Voice and vision in the study of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 75(4), 743–776. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfm061
  10. Geiger, N., Swim, J. K. & Glenna, L. (2019). Spread the green word: A social community perspective into environmentally sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(5), 561–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518812925
  11. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self everyday life. Penguin.
  12. Hayes, D.L. (2021). Foster, Elizabeth. African Catholic: Decolonization and the transformation of the church. The Journal of Religion, 101 (3), 404.405. https://doi.org/10.1086/714142
  13. Herman, J.L. (2015). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic Books.
  14. Irta, Sulastri., Sulaeman, S., Hakim, U. F. R., Zakirman., Novarisa, G., & Ridwan, M. (2022). The dramaturgy communication of beggars in an Indonesia Market. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(3), 1299-1317. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.3.20
  15. Kapferer, B. (2019). Victor Turner and the ritual process. Anthropology Today, 35(3), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12502
  16. Kapferer, B. (2019). Crisis and communitas: Victor Turner and social process. Anthropology Today, 35(5), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12525
  17. Knapp, M. L., & Daly, J. A. (2002). Handbook of interpersonal communication. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage.
  18. Lasswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication and society: The communication of idea (pp.203–243). New York, NY: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
  19. Lattu, I.Y.M. (2019). Mutual transformation in the early histories of Christianity and Islam. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v7i1.4252
  20. Littlejohn, SW. (2010). Theories of Human Communication. California: Wardsworth
  21. Majid, N. (1998). Kerukunan beragama, dalam Andito, ed., Atas nama agama wacana agama dalam dialog bebas konflik. Bandung: Pustaka Hidayat.
  22. Mead, G.H. (2008). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1934-15037-000
  23. Mensah, E.O; Ekawan A.S; Idom T.I. (2020). An ethnopragmatic study of libation rituals among the kiong-speaking Okoyong people in Southeastern Nigeria. Journal of Anthropological Research, 76(3), 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1086/70980
  24. Ridwan, M., Toisuta, H., Yanlua, M., Sulaeman, S. & Salam, N. (2020). The abda'u ritual: Ethnographic communication study of Tulehu society in the Moluccas, Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 709-722. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.67
  25. Ridwan, M., Sulaeman, S., Nurdin, A. et al. (2023). Ritual cross-religious in Moluccas immanuel church, Indonesia: Why involvement of Muslim communities?. Hu Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-023-00331-z
  26. Riyadi, A., & Karim, A. (2023). Da'wah bil-hikmah: Tracing Sunan Kalijaga's footsteps in the transformation of Islamic society. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 43(2), 281-296.
  27. Schutz, A. (1972). The Phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann Educational Book.
  28. Setiawan, W., & Ankhofiyya, N. (2023). The Symbolic meaning of marhabaan culture as a da'wah activity among the Nahdliyin community. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 43(2), 347-360. doi:https://doi.org/10.21580/jid.v43.2.18477
  29. Solomon, D. & Theisis, J. (2013). Interpersonal Communication: Putting Theory into Practice. UK: Taylor & Francis.
  30. Sulaeman, S. (2018). Simbolik Komunikasi Ritual Ukuwala Mahiate Masyarakat Islam Mamala Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. IBDA`: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Budaya, 16(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v16i2.1234
  31. Sulaeman., R. Maharani, & A. Nurdin. (2019). Komunikasi tradisi abda’u pada prosesi hewan qurban adat Tulehu Maluku. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 13(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v13i2.2067
  32. Sulaeman., Malawat, M. & Darma. (2019). Konstruksi makna bakupukul manyapu bagi masyarakat Mamala Maluku. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya. 21(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v21.n1.p61-72.2019
  33. Sulaeman, S., Kamaruzzaman, K., & Malawat, M. (2020). The ma'atenu communication rituals of Pelauw Muslims community. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 32(4), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V32I42019.426-441
  34. Sulaeman, S., Rijal, M., Malawat, M., & Sere, I. (2021) The symbolic communication of the ukuwala mahiate ritual of the Indigenous peoples of Mamala, Moluccas, Indonesia. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(2), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-019-00753-1
  35. Sulaeman, S., Ridwan, M., Sulastri, I. et al. (2022). Muslim communities' identity transformation through the pela gandong ritual communication in Moluccas Immanuel Church, Indonesia. Contemporary Islam . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-022-00489-3
  36. Tasleem, Z., Mohd, N.A., & Nor, A.Z.A. (2020). Examining the housing experiences in Malaysia: A qualitative research on Pakistani immigrant Labours. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 21, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-019-00723-7
  37. Toth, J. (2016). Review of three books on the Muslim brotherhood in egypt. Contemporary Islam, 10, 123–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-015-0337-z
  38. Turner, V. (1962). Themes in the symbolism of Ndemdu hunting ritual. Anthropological Quarterly, 35(2), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/3317003
  39. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti- structure. New York: Cornel University Press.
  40. Varisco, D. M. (2014). Review essay: Recent ethnography on contemporary Muslims. Contemporary Islam, 9(3), 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-014-0300-4
  41. Wood, S.A. (2014). Review of Gabriele Marranci, Understanding Muslim identity: Rethinking fundamentalism. Contemporary Islam, 8, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-012-0215-x

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats

 

Indexed by


      

Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah
Published by Faculty of Da'wa and Communication UIN Walisongo Semarang
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +622214085031
https://fakdakom.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: ilmudakwah@walisongo.ac.id

ISSN: 1693-8054 (print)
ISSN: 2581-236X (online)
DOI : 10.21580/jid


This work is licensed under CC Atribution - Non Comercial - ShareAlike 4.0.

 
apps