Behavioral psychology of men and women in Islam
Keywords:
Psychological behavior, gender, men and Different BrainAbstract
Purpose - This research aims to explore gender roles in the context of behavioral psychology from an Islamic perspective, focusing on the neuropsychological differences between men and women.
Method - The methodology employed is a qualitative library-based approach, involving the analysis of relevant literature sources, including journals, books, and Islamic texts. This study collects data from reputable academic sources and Islamic texts to build a comprehensive understanding of gender roles and the associated neuropsychological aspects.
Result - The findings indicate that the gender roles described in Islam may reflect certain neuropsychological function differences, which can influence the quality of life and dynamics of social interactions. It is important to note that while biological and psychological differences between men and women exist, both are often viewed as having equal social responsibilities within religious and moral contexts.
Implication - This study implies that there is a need for Muslim men and women to be aware of their obligations according to sharia and nature .
Originality/Value - The specialty of this study is that it explains neuropsychological concepts to understand the psychological behavior of women and men.
***
Tujuan - Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi peran gender dalam konteks psikologi perilaku dari perspektif Islam, dengan fokus pada perbedaan neuropsikologis antara pria dan wanita.
Metode - Metodologi yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif berbasis kepustakaan, yang melibatkan analisis sumber-sumber literatur yang relevan, termasuk jurnal, buku, dan teks-teks Islam. Penelitian ini mengumpulkan data dari sumber-sumber akademis terkemuka dan teks-teks Islam untuk membangun pemahaman yang komprehensif tentang peran gender dan aspek-aspek neuropsikologis yang terkait.
Hasil - Temuan menunjukkan bahwa peran gender yang dijelaskan dalam Islam dapat mencerminkan perbedaan fungsi neuropsikologis tertentu, yang dapat memengaruhi kualitas hidup dan dinamika interaksi sosial. Penting untuk dicatat bahwa meskipun terdapat perbedaan biologis dan psikologis antara laki-laki dan perempuan, keduanya sering dipandang memiliki tanggung jawab sosial yang sama dalam konteks agama dan moral.
Implikasi - Penelitian ini menyiratkan bahwa ada kebutuhan bagi pria dan wanita Muslim untuk menyadari kewajiban mereka sesuai dengan syariah dan kodrat.
Orisinalitas/Nilai - Nilai dari penelitian ini adalah mampu menjelaskan konsep neuropsikologi untuk memahami perilaku psikologis perempuan dan laki-laki.
Downloads
References
Refrences
Ahmad, S., & Shabnam, D. Z. (2023). A Study Of Psychological, Physical, And Mental Equality Between Men And Women In Islam. 170–174.
Bagley, K. M., Kate. (2015). Women’s Studies in Religion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315662244
Bakhshizadeh, M. (2023). A Social Psychological Critique on Islamic Feminism. Religions, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020202
Bennett, C. (2010). Muslim Women of Power: Gender, Politics and Culture in Islam. A&C Black.
Brenowitz, W. D. (2021). Invited Commentary: Body Mass Index and Risk of Dementia—Potential Explanations for Life-Course Differences in Risk Estimates and Future Research Directions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 190(12), 2511–2514. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab095
Carothers, B. J., & Reis, H. T. (2013). Men and women are from Earth: Examining the latent structure of gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030437
Cucu, C., & Waldan, R. (2023). Transformation of masjid raya management: Pioneering moderation-based administration, integrated financial system, and strengthening gender equality. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 43(2), Article 2. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/dakwah/article/view/18442
De Vries, J. A. (2015). Champions of gender equality: Female and male executives as leaders of gender change. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 34(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-05-2013-0031
Ergas, Y., Kochkorova, J., Pető, A., & Trujillo, N. (2022). Disputing “Gender” in Academia: Illiberalism and the Politics of Knowledge. Politics and Governance, 10(4), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5529
Goldner, L., Lev-Wiesel, R., & Simon, G. (2019). Revenge Fantasies After Experiencing Traumatic Events: Sex Differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00886
Grabowska, A. (2017). Sex on the brain: Are gender-dependent structural and functional differences associated with behavior? Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1–2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23953
Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (2017). Complementarity of Sex Differences in Brain and Behavior: From Laterality to Multi-Modal Neuroimaging. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1–2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23830
Hausmann, M. (2017). Why sex hormones matter for neuroscience: A very short review on sex, sex hormones, and functional brain asymmetries. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1–2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23857
Hines, M. (2020a). Human gender development. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 118, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.018
Hines, M. (2020b). Neuroscience and Sex/Gender: Looking Back and Forward. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0750-19.2019
Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & Van Anders, S. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307
Joel, D., & Fausto-Sterling, A. (2016). Beyond sex differences: New approaches for thinking about variation in brain structure and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1688), 20150451. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0451
Laman-Maharg, A., & Trainor, B. C. (2017). Stress, sex, and motivated behaviors. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1–2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23815
Lindqvist, A., Sendén, M. G., & Renström, E. A. (2021). What is gender, anyway: A review of the options for operationalising gender. Psychology & Sexuality, 12(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1729844
Loso, H. M., Dube, S. L., Chaarani, B., Garavan, H., Albaugh, M., Ivanova, M., & Potter, A. (2021). Sex Differences in Psychopathology in a Large Cohort of Nine and Ten-Year-Olds. Psychiatry Research, 302, 114026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114026
Marrocco, J., & McEwen, B. S. (2016). Sex in the brain: Hormones and sex differences. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 18(4), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.4/jmarrocco
McEwen, B. S., & Milner, T. A. (2017). Understanding the broad influence of sex hormones and sex differences in the brain. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95(1–2), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23809
Olson, E. A., Rosso, I. M., Demers, L. A., Divatia, S., & Killgore, W. D. S. (2016). Sex Differences in Psychological Factors Associated with Social Discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1876
Proverbio, A. M. (2023). Sex differences in the social brain and in social cognition. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 101(5), 730–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24787
Ramli, M. A., Rosele, M. I., Achmad, A. D., & Qotadah, H. A. (2023). Women’s Right of Inheritance in Islam: Between the Sharia Provision and Demand of Socio-cultural Changes. Khazanah Hukum, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v5i2.29181
Saleh, N. A. (2022). Al-Zamakhshari’s Rhetorical Questions in the Interpretation of Surat An-Nahl. Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences, 49(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.35516/law.v49i2.1518
Segalen, M. (2021). Gender and inheritance patterns in rural Europe: Women as wives, widows, daughters and sisters. History and Anthropology, 32(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2021.1905239
Shah, M. S., & Farooq, A. (2022). Islamic Teachings and Social Structure: Conviction and Contradictions. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Sulaiman, K. O., & Raifu, F. G. (2020). Investigating the Importance of Wearing Hijab by Muslim Women. INSANCITA, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2121/incita-jisisea.v5i1.1328
Tran, A. G. T. T., Lam, C. K., & Legg, E. (2018). Financial Stress, Social Supports, Gender, and Anxiety During College: A Stress-Buffering Perspective. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(7), 846–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018806687
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
