ZISWAF Digital Payment as An Effort to Reach Millennials

Fuad Hasyim*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia
Muhammad Al-Farido Awwal  -  Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nur Hidayah Al Amin  -  Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract: ZISWAF is an Islamic-led fundraising instrument aimed at wealth distribution. The existence of technological developments allows the adaptation of payments with all its acceleration. This study aims to determine the digital payment strategy to maximize ZISWAF’s revenue potential in Indonesia. This study uses the TAM, and TPB modification approaches. The methodology used is structural equation modeling (SEM) with a partial least square (PLS) approach. The sample used is the Y generation as a representation of the millennial generation. The results showed that all the variables forming the TAM theory (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude) and all the variables creating the TPB theory (subjective norms and perceived behavior control) significantly affect the Intention (INT) of individuals pay for online ZISWAF (sig. < 0.05, α=5%). Furthermore, attitude is a mediating variable in a partial/ quasi modification model that links perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEoU) to Intention (INT) (VAF=49.87%).

Abstrak: ZISWAF adalah instrumen pengumpulan dana yang dipelopori Islam dengan tujuan untuk distribusi kekayaan. Adanya perkembangan teknologi memungkinkan adaptasi pembayaran dengan segala akselerasinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui strategi pembayaran digital untuk memaksimumkan potensi pendapatan ZISWAF di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan modfikasi TAM dan TPB. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah structural equation modeling (SEM) dengan pendekatan partial least square (PLS). Sampel yang digunakan merupakan generasi Y sebagai representasi generasi milenial. Hasil menunjukkan seluruh variabel pembentuk teori TAM yakni perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEoU) dan attitude (ATT) dan seluruh variabel pembentuk teori TPB yakni subjective norms (SN) dan perceived behavior control (PBC) berpengaruh terhadap intention (INT) individu dalam membayar ZISWAF secara online (sig. < 0.05, α=5%).  Attitude (ATT) merupakan variabel pemediasi dalam model modifikasi yang bersifat partial/ quasy yang menghubungkan perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEoU) terhadap intention (INT) (VAF=49.87%)


  1. Aaron, Meyer, Francisco Rivadeneyra, and Samantha Sohal. 2017. “Fintech: Is This Time Different? A Framework for Assessing Risks and Opportunities for Central Banks.” Bank of Canada Staff Discussion Paper 10: 1–32.
  2. Abdul Latiff, Zul Ariff Bin, Golnaz Rezai, Zainalabidin Mohamed, and Mohamad Amizi Ayob. 2016. “Food Labels’ Impact Assessment on Consumer Purchasing Behavior in Malaysia.” Journal of Food Products Marketing 22 (2): 137–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2013.856053.
  3. Afthanorhan, Wan Mohamad Asyraf Bin Wan. 2013. “A Comparison Of Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Covariance Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) for Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Certified International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT). Vol. 2.
  4. Ajzen, Icek. 1985. “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.” In Action Control, 11–39. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.
  5. ———. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  6. Arner, Douglas W., Janos Nathan Barberis, and Ross P. Buckley. 2015. “The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm?” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553.
  7. Asmalia, Sarah, Rahmatina Awaliah Kasri, and Abdillah Ahsan. 2018. “Exploring the Potential of Zakah for Supporting Realization of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Indonesia.” International Journal of Zakat 3 (4): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v3i4.106.
  8. Awrey, Dan. 2013. “Toward a Supply-Side Theory of Financial Innovation.” Journal of Comparative Economics 41 (2): 401–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.03.011.
  9. Aziz, Noreen Noor Abd, Nurul Aien Abd.Aziz, Nurul Ashykin Abd Aziz, Zurina Omar, and Wan Haslin Aziah Wan Hassan. 2015. “A Review on the Emergence and Growth of Halal Studies.” Procedia Economics and Finance 31 (January): 325–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01204-6.
  10. Baskoro, Bimmo Dwi, and Gina Destrianti Karmanto. 2020. “Intensi Masyarakat Dalam Menyalurkan Zakat, Infaq, Dan Shadaqah (Zis) Melalui Penggunaan Platform Crowdfunding.” Point 2 (2): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.46918/point.v2i2.748.
  11. Baznas. 2019. “BAZNAS Sampaikan 6 Capaian Sukses Pada Rakornas Zakat 2019.” BAZNAS. 2019.
  12. Bulutoding, Lince, Rika Dwi Ayu Parmitasari, and Suhartono. 2019. “Perilaku Kepatuhan Para Wajib Zakat Di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.” Laa Maisyir 6 (2): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.24252/lamaisyir.v6i2.11800.
  13. Davis, Fred D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
  14. Franedya, Roy. 2019. “Terungkap! Transaksi GoPay Di 2018 Tembus Rp 87 T.” CNBC Indonesia. 2019. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20190211103125-37-54742/terungkap-transaksi-gopay-di-2018-tembus-rp-87-t.
  15. FSB. 2017. “FinTech Credit: Market Structure, Business Models and Financial Stability Implications.” BIS Media and Public Relation.
  16. Gia-Shie Liu, and Pham Tan Tai. 2016. “A Study of Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Mobile Payment Services in Vietnam.” Economics World 4 (6): 249–73. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-7144/2016.06.001.
  17. Haan, Jakob De, Sander Osterloo, and Dirk Schoenmaker. 2009. European Financial Market and Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Hasyim, Fuad. 2018. “The Determinant of Takaful Acceptance: Theory of Reasoned Action Approach.” Journal of Finance and Islamic Banking 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.22515/jfib.v1i1.1246.
  19. ———. 2019. “Peer To Peer Lending As Alternative Online Microfinance Platform: Threat and Challenge To Islamic Microfinance.” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society 4 (2): 2528–1194. https://doi.org/10.22515/islimus.v4i2.1491.
  20. Hasyim, Fuad, and Yulfan Arif Nurohman. 2021. “Adopsi Teori Perilaku Berencana Dalam Menganalisis Niat Melakukan Wakaf Tunai.” Among Makarti 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.52353/ama.v14i1.201.
  21. Hill, Richard J., Martin Fishbein, and Icek Ajzen. 1977. “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.” Contemporary Sociology 6 (2): 244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853.
  22. Jaffri Saad, Ram Al, and Roszaini Haniffa. 2014. “Determinants of Zakah (Islamic Tax) Compliance Behavior.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 5 (2): 182–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2012-0068.
  23. Junadi, and Sfenrianto. 2015. “A Model of Factors Influencing Consumer’s Intention To Use E-Payment System in Indonesia.” Procedia Computer Science 59 (Iccsci): 214–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.557.
  24. Karmanto, Gina Destrianti, A Jajang W Mahri, and Aas Nurasyiah. 2021. “Society Intention in Distribution of Zakat, Infaq and Shadaqah (ZIS) through the Use of Crowdfunding Platform.” Falah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 6 (1): 30–44. https://doi.org/10.22219/jes.v6i1.15133.
  25. Lai, PC. 2017. “The Literature Review Of Technology Adoption Models And Theories For The Novelty Technology.” Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management 14 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002.
  26. Latan, Hengky, and Richard Noonan. 2017. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Edited by Hengky Latan and Richard Noonan. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3.
  27. Latha, R, and C Vatchala. 2019. “Exploring the Factors Influencing the Mobile Wallet Usage Intention” 7 (2): 77–81.
  28. Mohamed Omar, Khairi, Nik Kamariah Nik Mat, Gaboul Ahmed Imhemed, and Fatihya Mahdi Ahamed Ali. 2012. “The Direct Effects of Halal Product Actual Purchase Antecedents among the International Muslim Consumers.” American Journal of Economics 2 (4): 87–92. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20120001.20.
  29. Moons, Ingrid, and Patrick De Pelsmacker. 2012. “Emotions as Determinants of Electric Car Usage Intention.” Journal of Marketing Management 28 (3–4): 195–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.659007.
  30. Mukhlis, Ahmad, and Irfan Syauqi Beik. 2013. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Tingkat Kepatuhan Membayar Zakat: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Bogor.” Al-Muzara’ah 1 (1): 83–106. https://doi.org/10.29244/jam.1.1.83-106.
  31. Othman, Yusuf Haji-, Ibadurrahman Alwi, Mohd Sholeh Sheh Yusuff, and Mohd Shahid Azim Mohd Saufi. 2017. “The Influence of Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Islamic Religiosity on Compliance Behavior of Income Zakat Among Educators.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 7 (11). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i11/3549.
  32. Pratama, Mutia Fatiha, and Raditya Sukmana. 2020. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Tpb Dan Religiosity Terhadap Willingness Dalam Berwakaf Pengurus Muhammadiyah Di Kota Surabaya.” Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan 7 (4): 633. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol7iss20204pp633-645.
  33. Purwanto, Purwanto, Muhammad Sulthon, and Milna Wafirah. 2021. “Behavior Intention to Use Online Zakat: Application of Technology Acceptance Model with Development.” Ziswaf: Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf 8 (1): 44. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v8i1.10457.
  34. Republika. 2019. “Baznas Harap Zakat Digital Di Indonesia Jadi Inspirasi Dunia.” Republika. 2019.
  35. Rina, Lelahester. 2019. “Student Leadership In School: Internalization Of Entrepreneurial Competence And Character.” Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan 21 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.21.1.1-8.
  36. Rouibah, Kamel, Ramayah Thurasamy, and Oh Sook May. 2009. “User Acceptance of Internet Banking In Malaysia.” International Journal of E-Adoption 1 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/jea.2009010101.
  37. Sapingi, Raedah, Noormala Ahmad, and Marziana Mohammad. 2011. “A Study On Zakah Or Employment Income: Factors That Influence Academics Intention to Pay Zakah.” In. Pahang, Malaysia.
  38. Schiffman, Leon, and Lazar Leslie Kanuk. 2007. Perilaku Konsumen Edisi Kedua. PT. Indeks Gramedia.
  39. Seetharaman, A, Karipur Nanda Kumar, S Palaniapan, and Golo Weber. 2017. “Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention to Use the Mobile Wallet in Singapore.” Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research 7 (2): 116–36.
  40. Shah Alam, Syed, and Nazura Mohamed Sayuti. 2011. “Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) in Halal Food Purchasing.” International Journal of Commerce and Management 21 (1): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/10569211111111676.
  41. Shih, Ya‐Yueh, and Kwoting Fang. 2004. “The Use of a Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior to Study Internet Banking in Taiwan.” Edited by Fang Kwoting. Internet Research 14 (3): 213–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410542643.
  42. Simamora, Novita Sari. 2019. “Aplikasi Pembayaran Online Dongkrak Penghimpunan Zakat.” Solopos. 2019.
  43. Simamora, Tria Putri, and Moh Djemdjem Djamaludin. 2020. “Analysis of Intention to Buy Cinema E-Tickets Among IPB Students with Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) Approach.” Journal of Consumer Sciences 5 (1): 58–72. https://doi.org/10.29244/jcs.5.1.58-72.
  44. Taylor, Shirley, and Peter A Todd. 1995. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models.” Information Systems Research 6: 144–76.
  45. Utami, Pertiwi, Tulus Suryanto, M Nasor, and Ruslan Abdul Ghofur. 2020. “The Effect Digitalization Zakat Payment Against Potential of Zakat Acceptance in National Amil Zakat Agency.” IQTISHADIA 13 (2): 216. https://doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v13i2.7809.
  46. Wiharjo, Bahana, and Achsania Hendratmi. 2020. “Persepsi Kegunaan, Kemudahan Penggunaan, Keamanan Dan Privasi Serta Kepercayaan Dalam Penggunaan Zakat Online: Dengan Pendekatan Tam.” Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan 6 (2): 331. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol6iss20192pp331-343.
  47. Wilson, Alan. 2010. “Book Review: Grown up Digital: How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World.” International Journal of Market Research 52 (1): 139–40. https://doi.org/10.2501/S1470785310201119.
  48. Wong, Kung Teck, Rosma bt Osman, Pauline Swee Choo Goh, and Mohd Khairezan Rahmat. 2013. “Understanding Student Teachers’ Behavioural Intention to Use Technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Validation and Testing.” International Journal of Instruction 6 (1): 89–104.
  49. Wong, Song-Lin, Cheng-Chin Hsu, and Han-Shen Chen. 2018. “To Buy or Not to Buy? Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Suboptimal Food.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15 (7): 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071431.
  50. Yusfiarto, Rizaldi, Ananda Setiawan, and Septy Setia Nugraha. 2020. “Literacy and Intention to Pay Zakat.” International Journal of Zakat 5 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v5i1.221.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam

Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Published by the Institute of Islamic Economic Research and Development (LP2EI), Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 858-7654-4666
Website: https://febi.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: economica@walisongo.ac.id

ISSN: 2085-9325 (Print)
ISSN: 2541-4666 (Online)
DOI: 10.21580/economica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here, and OAI Links here.