The Effect of E-LKPD Assisted PJBL-STEM Learning Model on Scientific Reasoning Ability and Argumentation Performance of Class XII Science Students in Renewable Energy Materials

Melania Sandri Ayuni*  -  Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
I Wayan Distrik  -  Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Viyanti Viyanti  -  Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/perj.2022.4.2.12634

This research aims to analyze and prove the influence of scientific reasoning ability and argumentation performance of students who follow the PjBL-STEM learning model assisted by e-LKPD with conventional models in learning Physics class XII IPA SMAN 15 Bandar Lampung. The research design was quasi-experimental (quasi-experimental), and the pretest posttest design was used. The population in this study were all students of class XII IPA. The research sample was determined by random sampling technique. The sample in this study was XII IPA 1 as the control class and class XII IPA 3 as the experimental class. Data was collected using test questions, questionnaire sheets and observation sheets. Hypothesis testing using t test and Manova test. The results showed that there was an effect of scientific reasoning ability and student argumentation performance between students who took the PjBL-STEM learning model assisted by e-LKPD and students who followed the conventional learning model based on the results of the Manova test with an F value from Wilks' Lambda. = 43.208 and the significance value = 0.000. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is an influence of scientific reasoning ability and argumentation performance of students who follow the PjBL-STEM learning model assisted by e-LKPD with conventional learning models in learning Physics class XII IPA SMA Negeri 15 Bandar Lampung.

 

Keywords: E-LKPD; Performance Argumentation; PjBL; Scientific Reasoning; STEM

  1. Anjani, F., Supeno, S., & Subiki, S. (2020). Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa Sma Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Disertai Diagram Berpikir Multidimensi. Lantanida Journal, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v8i1.6306
  2. Daniel, F. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Implementasi Project Based Learning (PJBL) Berpendekatan Saintifik. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v1i1.76
  3. Dwita, L., & Susanah, S. (2020). Penerapan Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Stem) Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di Smk Pada Jurusan Bisnis Konstruksi Dan Properti. MATHEdunesa, 9(2), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n2.p276-286
  4. Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran Dengan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Melalui Pbl (Problem Based Learning). Biodidaktika, Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.30870/biodidaktika.v13i2.3677
  5. Festiawan, R. (2020). Belajar dan pendekatan pembelajaran. 2020, 1–17.
  6. Insyasiska, D., Zubaidah, S., Susilo, H., Biologi, P., & Malang, U. N. (n.d.). Pengaruh Project Based Learning Terhadap Motivasi Belajar , Kreativitas , Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis , Dan.
  7. Irvan, A., Admoko, S., Fisika, J., Surabaya, U. N., Ilmiah, K. A., Pembelajaran, M., Inquiry, A. D., & Diskusi, M. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Berbasis Pola Toulmin's Argument Pattern ( TAP ) Menggunakan Model Argument. 09(03), 318–324.
  8. Kartini, D., Nurohmah, A. N., & Wulandari, D. (2022). Relevansi Strategi Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning ( PBL ) dengan Keterampilan Pembelajaran Abad 21. 6, 9092–9099.
  9. Lestari, D. A. B., Astuti, B., & Darsono, T. (2018). Implementasi LKS Dengan Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 4(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i2.809
  10. Marliani, N. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP). Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i1.166
  11. Putriani, J. D., & Hudaidah, H. (2021). Penerapan Pendidikan Indonesia Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 830–838. https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/407
  12. Suryaningsih, S., & Nurlita, R. (2021). Pentingnya Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Elektronik (E-LKPD) Inovatif dalam Proses Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(7), 1256–1268. https://doi.org/10.36418/japendi.v2i7.233
  13. TAMA, N. B., PROBOSARI, R. M., WIDORETNO, S., & INDRIYATI, I. (2016). Project Based Learning to Improve Written Argumentation Skill of Tenth Graders. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i2.4224
  14. Triastuti, E. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Stem Pjbl Pada Pembuatan Ice Cream Learning Model of Pjbl Stem in Making Ice Cream Train. Ideguru : Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 5(2), 67–74.
  15. Utami, I. S., Septiyanto, R. F., Wibowo, F. C., & Suryana, A. (2017). Pengembangan STEM-A (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematic and Animation) Berbasis Kearifan Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 6(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v6i1.1581

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Physics Education Research Journal
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 
apps