The Effect of HOTS-Oriented Blended Learning Model on Work and Energy Materials Using Google Classroom for Students' Critical Thinking Skill

Qonita Puja Kesuma*  -  Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Feriansyah Sesunan  -  Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Ismu Wahyudi  -  Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/perj.2022.4.2.12829

This study aims to determine the effect of HOTS-oriented blended learning model student worksheets on work and energy materials assisted by Google Classroom on critical thinking skill. This research was conducted at SMAN 1 Tanjung Bintang using a quasi-experimental form of non-equivalent control group design with purposive sampling technique. The sample of this research is students of grade X MIPA 2 and X MIPA 3. The data were tested by N-gain analysis, independent sample T-test, and Effect size test. The average N-gain in the experimental grade is 0.64 in the medium category. The results of the independent sample T-test showed that there was a difference in the average N-gain of students' critical thinking skill in the experimental grade and the control grade, which showed that the treatment had a significant effect. The magnitude of the effectiveness of using Effect size shows a value (d) of 0.91 with a higher category. The results of the research in the experimental grade showed an increase in students' critical thinking skill that were higher than the control grade, this means that there is an effect using the HOTS-oriented blended learning model worksheet assisted by Google Classroom on improving students' critical thinking skill.

Keywords: Blended Learning Model; Critical Thinking Skill; Energy Materials; Google Classroom; HOTS

  1. AAbdurrozak, R., Jayadinata, A. K., & Isrok’atun. (2016). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berargumentasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2 (1): 16-31
  2. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  3. Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2021). Industry, science education, and teacher agency: A discourse analysis of teachers’ evaluations of industry-produced teaching resources. Science Education, 105(2), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21607
  4. Anggraeni, A., Supriana, E., & Hidayat, A. (2019). Pengaruh Blended Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(6), 758. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i6.12505
  5. Artiningsih, A., & Nurohman, S. (2019). Analysis of investigative skills based on the use of tracker video analysis for 21 th century skill. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 13(2), 81–86.
  6. Erlina, N., Susantini, E., Wasis, Wicaksono, I., & Pandiangan, P. (2018). The Effectiveness of Evidence based Reasoning in Inquiry based-Physics Teaching to Increase Students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17, Continuous. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.972
  7. Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. www.physics.indiana.edu/sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf diakses 10 November 2017
  8. Hartati, R., & Sholihin, H. (2015). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Implementasi Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Siswa SMP. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains, 1(1), 1–5. http://www.academia.edu/download/49573147/EDU_133_-__RISA_HARTATI_-_Rev.pdf
  9. Kaniawati, I., Danawan, A., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2021). Implementation of Interactive Conceptual Instruction (ICI) With Computer Simulation: Impact of Students’ Misconceptions on Momentum and Impulse Material. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.8375
  10. Kristiyani, Y., Sesunan, F., & Wahyudi, I. (2020). Pengaruh Aplikasi Sensor Smartphone Pada Pembelajaran Simple Harmonic Motion Berbasis Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v8i2.3031
  11. Kurniawan, H., & Purworejo, U. M. (n.d.). (2020). Efektifitas Pembelajaran Problem Solving dan Investigasi Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2): 56–67.
  12. Lewa, I. W. L., Susanto, H., & Marwoto, P. (2017). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Pada Siswa Sma. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 400–404.
  13. Lina. (2015). Strategi Pembelajaran Fisika menggunakan Pendekatan Inkuiri, Jurnal Edusains, 13(3), 1576–1580.
  14. Meriyanti, M., Pratiwi, R. H., Gresinta, E., & Sulistyaniningsih, E. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP terhadap mata pelajaran IPA Melalui Penggunaan Media Google Classroom. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 5(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.5.2.226-232
  15. Narvaez Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G. A., Loaiza Buitrago, D. F., & Tavera Romero, C. A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society. Sustainability, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567
  16. Nurhidayati, D., Sesunan, F., & Wahyudi, I. (2017). Perbandingan Penggunaan Lks (Predict-Observe-Explain) Dengan Lks Konvensional Terhadap Hasil Belajar. JPF: Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 5(2), 45–56.
  17. Permatasari, O. I., & Trisnawati, D. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Berbasis Way of Investigating untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Siswa SMK. Physics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2021.3.2.8719
  18. Sakliressy, M. T., Sunarno, W., & Nurosyid, F. (2021). Students Scientific Attitude in Learning Physics Using Problem Based Learning Model with Experimental and Project Methods. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 10(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.8347
  19. Schuchard, A. M., Tekkumru-Kisa, M., & Schunn, C. D. (2017). How much professional development is needed with educative curriculum materials? It depends upon the intended student learning outcomes. Science Education, 101(6), 1015–1033.
  20. Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  21. Susilawati, Ramalis, T., Kaniawati, I., & Rusdiana, D. (2021). Connections between prior knowledge and collaborative skill on discussion group about solar system related to descriptive scientific reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918, 52052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052052
  22. Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
  23. Wusqo, I. U., Khusniati, M., Pamelasari, S. D., Laksono, A., & Wulandari, D. (2021). The Effectiveness of Digital Science Scrapbook on Students' Science Visual Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 10(1), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.27130.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Physics Education Research Journal
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 
apps