STRATEGI PENINGKATAN MUTU PERGURUAN TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM BERBASIS BALANCED SCORECARD

Machasin Machasin*  -  State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Walisongo, Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ws.19.2.180

This study is a policy research, which use STAIN in Central Java as objects of research, while faculty, students, employees, officers and graduates of the unit being analyzed. The analysis technique used is exploratory descriptive. To implement the balanced scorecard at STAIN would require accurately data and documents, it is to be aware of changes in key indicators that can be used as the basis of evidence the organization’s activities. In this study, the perspective which used is the perspective of stakeholders, administrative and financial management, and the teaching and learning process, work ethos, culture and good governance. The results of the five perspective are referred to the differences of implementation, but for administrative and financial management perspective STAIN, in Central Java, faced the same thing that is the not optimal care units so that are still limited contribution to STAIN revenue.

 

Keywords: balanced scorecard; mutu PTAI; STAIN

  1. Averson, Paul, “A Balanced Scorecard for City & County Services,” http:// www.balanced scorecard.org, diakses pada tanggal 25 Agustus 2011.
  2. Averson, Paul, “Building a Government Balanced Scorecard: Phase 2 –Implementation and Automation,” http://www.balanced scorecard.org, diakses pada tanggal 25 Agustus 2011.
  3. “Balanced Scorecard as a Control System for Monitoring and Revising Corporate Strategy,” http://www.ssrn.com, diakses pada tanggal 12 Februari 2011.
  4. Gazperz, Vincent, Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Terintegrasi Balanced Scorecard dengan Six Sigma untuk Organisasi Pemerintah, Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2002.
  5. Giri, Efraim Ferdinan, “Balanced Scorecard: Suatu Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Strategik,” Kajian Bisnis, No. 13, Edisi Januari-April 1998, h. 35-46.
  6. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., “Putting The Balanced Scorecard to Work,” Harvard Business Review, September-October 1993, p. 134-142
  7. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., “The Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992, p. 71-79
  8. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., “Using The Balanced Scorecard As A Strategic Management System,” Harvard Business Review, January-February 1996a, p. 75-85
  9. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., The Balanced Scorecard: Translating a Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1996b.
  10. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., “Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work,” Harvard Business Review, 1993.
  11. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., Balanced Scorecard: Me¬nerap¬kan Strategi Menjadi Aksi, Erlangga: Jakarta, 1996.
  12. Kaplan, R. and Norton, D., Balanced Scorecard: Trans¬lating Strategy Into Action, Boston: Havard Business School Press, 1996.
  13. Laela, Fatma, “Balanced Scorecard: Sebagai Alternatif Pengukuran Kinerja Manajemen .” Jurnal Teknologi Bisnis, Vol. 2 No. 1, Tahun 1998.
  14. Lasdi, Lodovicus. Agustus, “Balanced Scorecard sebagai Rerangka Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan Secara Komprehensif dalam Lingkungan Bisnis Global,” Jurnal Widya Manajemen dan Akuntansi, Vol .2 No. 2, Tahun 2002, h. 150-169.
  15. Mahmudi, Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik, Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN, 2007.
  16. Malina, Mary, A. dan Selto, Frank, H., “Communicating and Controlling Strategy: an Emperical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard,” http://www.ssrn.com, diakses pada tanggal 8 Februari 2011.
  17. Mulyadi dan Setyawan Jhony, Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian manajemen: Sistem Pelipatgandaan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan, Salemba Empat: Jakarta, 2001.
  18. Mowen, J.C, Customer Behavior, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 1995.
  19. Mulyadi, “Strategic Management System dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard” (Bagian Pertama dari Dua Tulisan), Usahawan, No 02, Tahun XXVIII, Februari, 1999, h. 39-46.
  20. Mulyadi, “Strategic Management System dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard” (Bagian Akhir dari Dua Tulisan), Usahawan, No. 03, Tahun XXVIII, Maret, 1999, h. 36-41.
  21. Mulyadi, Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Manajemen, Yogyakarta: Aditya Media, 1999.
  22. Mulyadi, Balanced Scorecard, Salemba Empat, Jakarta, 2001.
  23. Mulyadi, Balanced Scorecard: Alat Manajemen Kontemporer untuk Pelipatgandaan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan, Salemba Empat: Jakarta, 2001.
  24. Rohm, Howard, “Improve Public Sector results With A Balanced Scorecard: Nine Steps To Succcess,” http://www.balancedscorecard.org, diakses pada tanggal 25 Agustus 2011.
  25. Sumarni, Murti dan John Soeprihanto, Pengantar Bisnis, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1998.
  26. Yuwono, Sony, Petunjuk Praktis Penyusunan Balanced Scorecard: Menuju Organisasi Yang Berfokus Pada Strategi, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2002.
  27. Zaeni, “Strategi Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik dengan Kerangka Balanced Scorecard,” MGS, Vol. 5 No. 32, Desember 2000, h. 13-38.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2011 Machasin Machasin
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M)
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Rectorate Building, 3rd Floor
Jl. Prof. Hamka - Kampus 3, Tambakaji Ngaliyan 50185, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Email: walisongo@walisongo.ac.id

 

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats

 

apps