The Linguistic Modeling of Variation in Islam: Constructing Saussure’s Concepts of Langue and Parole to Religious Studies

Ronald Lukens-Bull*  -  University of North Florida, United States
Kristen Angelucci Zahn  -  University of North Florida, United States

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ws.26.1.2088

Islam has some basic set of shared symbols, beliefs, and rituals that are found in the Quran and Hadith. These form the foundations of universal Islam. But even with the “universal” foundations of Islam we find considerable debate and disagreement. Dealing with the diversity in Islam, we will develop our model, especially through the more complete linguistic analogies. The core of our model borrows Saussure’s concepts of langue (language as a system) and parole (speech acts) and applied it to religion. The transcendent form of a religion, which is parallel to langue, is an ideal form in the minds and hearts of believers. The expressed form, which is analogous to parole, includes interpretations, discourse, debates, rituals, and daily life of believers. The aim of this paper is more to elucidate an analytical model than to make declarative statements about the nature of religion. We argue that a fuller linguistic analogy moves us further in our understanding of this relationship. The results of the analysis show that linguistic modeling of variation in Islam applied through several ways, there are: (1) dialects and local religious practice (2) the transcendent and the expressed as parallels to Saussure’s langue and parole (3) linguistic analogies (4) myth, doctrine, and grammar (4) syntax, Islam and ritual and (5) creoles and pidgins.

Keywords: creoles and pidgins; Islam; langue and parole; linguistic; religious studies

  1. Antoun, Richard T. 1989. Muslim Preacher in the Modern World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  2. Asad, Talal. 1986. “The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam.” In Occasional Papers Series. Washington, D.C.: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.
  3. Bailey, F.G. 1977. Morality and Expediency: The Folklore of Academic Politics. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.
  4. Bakhtiar, Laleh, and Kevin A. Reinhart. 1996. Encyclopedia of Islamic Law : A Compendium of the Views of the Major Schools. ABC International Group.
  5. Becker, Judith. 1993. Gamelan Stories: Tantrism, Islam, and Aesthetics in Central Java. Tempe, AZ: Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Arizona State University.
  6. Berg, Herbert. 1999. “Elijah Muhammad and the Qur’an: The Evolution of His Tafsir.” Muslim World 89 (1): 42–55.
  7. Bhardwaj, Surinder M. 1998. “Non-Hajj Pilgrimage: A Neglected Dimension of Religious Circulation.” Journal of Cultural Geography 17 (2): 69–87.
  8. Bowen, John R. 1989. “Salāt in Indonesia: The Social Meanings of an Islamic Ritual.” Man (N.S) 24: 600–619.
  9. ———. 1993a. “Discursive Monotheisms.” American Ethnologist 20 (1): 185–90.
  10. ———. 1993b. Muslims through Discourse: Religion and Ritual in Gayo Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  11. ———. 2012. A New Anthropology of Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139045988.
  12. Chambert-Loir, Henri, and Anthony Reid. 2002. The Potent Dead. Ancestors, Saints and Heroes in Contemporary Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
  13. Chandler, Daniel. 2006. Semiotics for Beginners. Cardiff, Wales: University of Wales.
  14. Chomsky, Noam. 2002. Language and the Brain. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Davies, Merryl Wyn. 1988. Knowing One Another: Shaping an Islamic Anthropology. New York: Mansell Pub.
  16. Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. 1994. Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Tentang Pandangan Hidup Kiai. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  18. Drewes, Gerardus. 1978. Early Code of Javanese Muslim Ethics. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
  19. Eickleman, Dale F. 1976. Moroccan Islam: Tradition and Society in a Pilgrimage Center. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  20. ———. 1982. “The Study of Islam in Local Contexts.” Contributions to Asian Studies 17: 1–18.
  21. El-Zein, Abdul Hamid M. 1977. “Beyond Ideology and Theology: The Search for the Anthropology of Islam.” Annual Review of Anthropology 6: 227–54.
  22. Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
  23. Feillard, Andree, and Lies Marcoes. 1998. “Female Circumcision in Indonesia: To ‘Islamize’ in Celebration or Secret.” Archipel 56: 337–67.
  24. Friedlander, Shems. 1992. The Whirling Dervishes : Being an Account of the Sufi Order Known as the Mevlevis and Its Founder the Poet and Mystic Mevlana Jalalu’ddin Rumi. New York: State University of New York Press.
  25. Geertz, Clifford. 1960. The Religion of Java. New York: The Free Press.
  26. ———. 1968. Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. doi:http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07274.
  27. ———. 1973. Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. doi:10.1016/0039-9140(73)80012-8.
  28. Goldziher, Ignaz. 1910. Introduction of Islamic Theology and Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  29. Gunaratna, Rohan. 2002. Inside Al-Qaeda. New York: Columbia University Press.
  30. Hartley, Elda. 1974. “Sacred Trances in Java and Bali.” Westport: Hartley Film Foundation.
  31. Johns, A.H. 1987. “Tariqah.” In The Encyclopaedia of Religion, edited by Mircea Eliade, 342–252. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  32. Juynboll, Th. W. 1953. “Djum’a.” Shorter Encyclopedia of Islam. E.J. Brill; Luzac & Co.
  33. Khanna, Parag. 2009. “Why We Should Get Rid of the Term Muslim World.” The Washington Post, April 19.
  34. Lee, Martha. 1996. The Nation of Islam: An American Millenarian Movement. New York: Syracuse University Press.
  35. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
  36. ———. 1998. “The Meaning and Use of the Notion of Model.” In Teaching Lévi-Strauss. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
  37. Loeffler, Reinhold. 1988. Islam in Practice: Religious Beliefs in a Persian Village. New York: State University of New York Press.
  38. Lukens-Bull, Ronald. 1999. “Between Text and Practice: Considerations in the Anthropological Study of Islam.” Marburg Journal of Religion 4 (2): 10–20.
  39. ———. 2003. “An Accidental Imago Mundi: Spatializing Religious and Social Change in Islamic Java.” In Sacred Places and Modern Landscapes: Sacred Geography and Social-Religious Transformations in Asia, 203–26. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University Program for Southeast Asian Studies.
  40. Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1948. Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. Glencoe: The Free Press.
  41. Marranci, Gabrielle. 2008. The Anthropology of Islam. Oxford: Berg Publishers Bloomsbury Academic. doi:10.5040/9781474215626.
  42. Massignon, L. 1953. “Tarika.” In Shorter Encyclopaedia of Islam, edited by H.A.R.Gibb and J.H. Kramers, 573–78. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
  43. Quranic Path. 2018. “Circumcision - Does the Quran Approve It?” QuranicPath.Com. Accessed December 24. http://www.quranicpath.com/misconceptions/circumcision.html.
  44. Redfield, Robert. 1956. Peasant Society and Culture. Chicago: Unversity of Chicago Press.
  45. Roy, Oliver. 2004. Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.
  46. Saniotis, Arthur. 2004. “Tales of Mastery: Spirit Familiar in Sufis’ Religious Imagination.” Ethos 32 (3): 397–411.
  47. Saussure, Ferdinand. 1972. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Roy Harris. Chicago: Open Court.
  48. Schimmel, Annemarie. 1991. “Sacred Geography in Islam.” In Sacred Places and Profane Spaces: Essays in the Geographics of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, edited by Jamie Scott and Paul Simpson-Housely. New York.
  49. Subtelny, M.E. 1989. “The Cult of Holy Places: Religious Practices among Soviet Muslims.” Middle East Journal 43 (4): 593–604.
  50. Suparlan, Parsudi. 1995. “The Javanese in Suriname: Ethnicity in an Ethnically Plural Society.” Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies.
  51. United States Department of State. 2001. “Indonesia: Report on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) or Female Genital Cutting (FGC).” Refworld.Org. https://www.refworld.org/docid/46d57879c.html.
  52. Varisco, Daniel Martin. 2005. Islam Obscured : The Rhetoric of Anthropological Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Ronald Lukens-Bull, Kristen Angelucci Zahn
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M)
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Rectorate Building, 3rd Floor
Jl. Prof. Hamka - Kampus 3, Tambakaji Ngaliyan 50185, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Email: walisongo@walisongo.ac.id

 

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats

 

apps