Legitimasi Kekuasaan atas Sejarah Keruntuhan Kerajaan Majapahit dalam Wacana Foucault

Muhammad Iqbal Birsyada

doi:10.21580/ws.24.2.974

Legitimasi Kekuasaan atas Sejarah Keruntuhan Kerajaan Majapahit dalam Wacana Foucault

* - Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: 10.21580/ws.24.2.974

Abstract
References
Licensing
How to cite

The history of the collapse of the Majapahit showed the discourse of power. In this context rule has been supporting a particular version of historical knowledge. Applying historical method and multi-dimensional approach, this study aims to find out why the knowledge about the collapse of Majapahit spreading among community members was more tended toward the version that Girindrawardhana as a single actor who overthrow Prabu Brawijaya V. The results of this study indicated that the knowledge among Javanese community about the collapse of Majapahit that stated Girindrawardhana as the sole actor that attacked and subverted the kingdom of Majapahit which at the time was ruled by King Kertabhumi (Brawijaya V) is supported by a wide range of all power of the ruling elite that were largely due to ideological motives. Power and ideology are used as a means of legalizing knowledge.

Keywords: history; power; discourse; Foucault; Majapahit

Birsyada, Muhammad Iqbal, “Peristiwa Konflik Pecahnya Keluarga di Kerajaan Demak dalam Persepsi Penulis Babad,” Tesis, Semarang: UNNES, 2012.
Creaven, Sean, Marxisme dan Realisme. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.
Djafar, H., Masa Akhir Majapahit, Girindrawardhana dan Masalahnya, Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu, 2009.
Florida, Nancy K. Menyurat yang Silam Menggurat Yang Menjelang Sejarah sebagai Nubuat di Jawa Masa Kolonial. Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya, 2003.
Garrraghan, Gillbert, J., A Guide to Historical Method, New York: Fordham University Press, 1957.
Gottschalk, Louis, Mengerti Sejarah, terj. Nugroho Notosusanto, Jakarta: UI Press, 1984.
Graaf, H.J. de., Muslim Cina di Jawa Abad XV dan XVI:Antara Historitas dan Mitos, terj. Al-Fajri, Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2004.
Hasyim, Umar, Sunan Giri, Kudus: Menara Kudus, 1979.
Kartodirdjo, Sartono, Pemikiran dan Perkembngan Historiografi Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1982.
__________, Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam Metodologi Sejarah, Jakarta: Gramedia, 1993.
K. Bertens, Sejarah Filsafat Kontemporer Perancis, Jakarta: Gramedia, 2001.
Kasri, Khafid Muhammad dan Semedi Pujo, Sejarah Demak Matahari Terbit di Glagah Wangi, Demak: Kantor Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Demak, 2008.
Marx, Karl and Engels, Frederick, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, selected works in theree volumes volume one. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1989.
Muljana, Slamet, Runtuhnya Kerajaan Hindu Jawa dan Timbulnya Negara-Negara Islam Di Nusantara, Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2005
Ritzer, George dan Goodman, Douglas J., Teori Sosiologi Modern, terj. Alimandan, Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media Group, 2008.
Ritzer, George, Encyclopedia of Social Theory, Vol. I, California: Sage Publications, Inc, 2005.
Ritzer George dan Barry Smart, Handbook Teori Sosial, terj. Imam Muttaqien, Derta Sri Widowatie dan Waluyati, Bandung: Nusa Media kerjasama dengan Diadit Media, 2014
Riyadi, Selamet dan Suwaji, Babad Demak I. Jakarta: Depdikbud Proyek Penerbitan Buku Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah,1981.
Sastronaryatmo, Moelyono, Babad Jaka Tingkir.Jakarta: Depdikbud, 1981.
Sayers, Sean, Marxism and Human Nature, USA and Canada: Routledge, 2003.
Sulendraningrat, Babad Tanah Sunda Babad Cirebon. Jakarta: t.p., 1984.
Wasino, Dari Riset Hingga Tulisan Sejarah, Semarang: Unnes Press, 2007.
Weber, Economy And Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1978..
__________, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalis, edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, Routledge’s, 2005..
Wuthnow, Robert, dkk., Cultural Analysis: The Work of Peter L Berger, Mary Dougas, Michel Foucault and Jurgen Habermas, London and New York. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987