PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN PENGETAHUAN AWAL (PRIOR KNOWLEDGE) MAHASISWA PADA MATERI TERMOKIMIA

Riva Ismawati*  -  Universitas Tidar, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

 

This study aims to determine the characteristics of the testlet assessment instrument items of student’s prior knowledge on thermochemistry material. The method used in this research was research and development method of 3-D model (Define, Design, Develop). Instruments were piloted on 39 students and validated by experts. Instrument reliability (r11) of the instrument was 0.9 with very high category. The validity of the items consisted of 42 valid questions, and 3 invalid questions. The difficulty index of item consisted of 7 difficult questions, 34 moderate questions, and 4 easy questions. Discrimination index of item consisted of 7 questions bad category, 17 questions enough category, 20 questions good category, and 1 question very good category.

Keywords : assessment instrument, prior knowledge, teslet, thermochemistry

 

Abstrak

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan karakteristik butir soal instrumen penilaian pengetahuan awal (prior knowledge) mahasiswa berbentuk tes teslet pada materi termokimia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian dan pengembangan model 3-D (Define, Design, Develop). Instrumen diujicobakan pada 39 mahasiswa dan divalidasi oleh ahli. Reliabilitas instrumen r11 sebesar 0,9 dengan kategori sangat tinggi. Validitas butir soal terdiri dari 42 soal valid, dan 3 soal tidak valid. Tingkat kesulitan butir soal terdiri dari 7 soal sukar, 34 soal sedang, dan 4 soal mudah. Daya pembeda butir soal terdiri dari 7 soal jelek, 17 soal cukup, 20 soal baik, dan 1 soal sangat baik.

Kata kunci: instrumen penilaian, pengetahuan awal, testlet, termokimia
  1. Arends, R. (1997). Classroom instruction and management. McGraw-Hill Companies.
  2. Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  3. Chiappetta, E.L., & Koballa, T.R. (2010). Science Instruction in The Middle and secondary School 7th Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  4. Embretson, S., E., & Reise, S., P. (2000). Item Respon Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Hailikari, T. (2010). Assessing university students' prior knowledge.
  6. Kusumaningrum, L., Yamtinah, S., & Saputro, A. N. C. (2015). Pengembangan instrumen tes diagnostik kesulitan belajar kimia SMA kelas XI semester I menggunakan model teslet. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 4(4), 36-45.
  7. Matondang, Z. (2009). Validitas dan reliabilitas suatu instrumen penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa, 6(1), 87-97.
  8. Maulana, P. (2010). Usaha Mengurangi Terjadinya Miskonsepsi Fisika Melalui Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 6(2).
  9. Saricayir, H., Ay, S., Comek, A., Cansiz, G., & Uce, M. (2016). Determining Students’ Conceptual Understanding Level of Thermodynamics. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6), 69-79.
  10. Shiell, R., & Slepkov, A. (2015). Integrated Testlets: A New Form of Expert-Student Collaborative Testing. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 8, 201-210.
  11. Slepkov, A. D. (2013). Integrated testlets and the immediate feedback assessment technique. American Journal of Physics, 81(10), 782-791.
  12. Slepkov, A. D., & Shiell, R. C. (2014). Comparison of integrated testlet and constructed-response question formats. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020120.
  13. Suastra, I. W. (2009). Pembelajaran sains terkini: Mendekatkan siswa dengan lingkungan alamiah dan sosial budayanya. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
  14. Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.
  15. Susongko, P. (2010). Perbandingan keefektifan bentuk tes uraian dan testlet dengan penerapan graded response model (GRM). Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(2), 269-288.
  16. Suyanto, K., E. (2010). Model-Model pembelajaran. Malang: Kementrian Pendidikan nasional Universitas Negeri Malang Panitia Sertifikasi Guru (PSG) Rayon 15.
  17. Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.
  18. Wahyuni, I. T., Yamtinah, S., & Utami, B. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Pendeteksi Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Kelas X Menggunakan Model Testlet. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 4(4), 222-231.
  19. Westwood, P. S. (2004). Learning and learning difficulties: A handbook for teachers. Aust Council for Ed Research.
  20. Yalcinkaya, E., Tastan, O., & Boz, Y. (2009). High School Students’ Conceptions about Energy in Chemical Reactions. Journal of Pamukkale University Education Faculty. 26: 1-11.
  21. Yamtinah, S. Haryono, & Martini, KS 2014. Profil Individu Peserta Didik Pelengkap Tes Jenis Testlet sebagai Alternatif Pendeteksi Kesulitan Belajar Kimia. Jurnal Profesi Pendidikan, 1(01), 1-10.
  22. Zakaria, E., & Yusoff, N. (2009). Attitudes and problem-solving skills in algebra among Malaysian matriculation college students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 232-245.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published by Faculty of Science and Technology UIN Walisongo Semarang
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 815-7502-8676
Website: https://fst.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: phenomenon@walisongo.ac.id

apps